Replies

I was referring to your statement:

"And the neurologist that you claim to be incredible (boy everyone is!!) is a Nobel Prize nominee - not exactly considered a hack. Now the latest neurologist to see her has suggested that she may have been misdiagnosed. He is from the Mayo Clinic and is widely renowned. Another incredible hack?"

You are the one who has the docs mixed up.

The rest of your post... figure it out. If you want to believe Carla Iyer over the other nurses, you either haven't read the GAL reports, heard the comments by Pearse tonight, or ... I wont say.

You want links to all 1300 pages? lol

I told you - read my profile page. A lot of the links are there, the others can be accessed from them. the 900 pages of court transcript are not uploaded yet. Right now, I'm on pain meds and typing is painful, so it'll be a few days.

Actually, if you look at my statement, I was talking about two doctors. I did not say you were mixing them up - I only asked you to please clarify your remarks.

You told another poster to look at your profile, but I will be happy to. As for the link you posted, you say in one breath that this forum is not the place for credible research, yet you refer me to another thread!! I checked out some of the links about Dr. Hammesfahr. There is another OPINION from a doctor about his research. Why take one on face value over the other? I have done a search of my own and there are many positive opinions as well.

I have read GAL reports, though I did not hear Pearse tonight. I was making a point that if you refute facts by others, you should back up your assertions, not simply tell people to do the research because obviously many of us have read a great deal about this.