Skip to comments.
Starved for justice (ANN COULTER re: Schiavo)
WorldNetDaily ^
| 3/23/05
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 03/23/2005 3:43:40 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 next last
To: mjtobias
If you want to be taken seriously, lose your tagline.
To: AZ_Cowboy
DRUDGE FOR PRESIDENT
ANN FOR FIRST LADY AND VICE PRESIDENT. ( I WANT TO MAKE SURE SHE IS IN TOTAL CONTROL)
To: TAdams8591
EXACTLY! 6 days without food or water is twice as long as a person is suppose to last. She could not have been in THAT bad condition to be still alive! Jeb should have gone in FIRST and then let the courts and lawmakers battle it out. This way is like waiting for the house to be burned down before turn on the water!
To: EveningStar
Yeah, the Supreme Court said slaves were property too. That made it right and legal? NO!
GET IT RIGHT FIRST, THEN GET IT LEGAL.
To: MarkL
LOL, I did forget his proper name and the raid at the eagles lair.
To: Sola Veritas
Yes. Jeb should be willing to risk his Political life to save a REAL life.
To: TomasUSMC
This is 2005, not 1861 or 1776.
To: RaceBannon
Wow... You told my story as well. Thanks.
108
posted on
03/23/2005 10:38:15 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Rats = Party of DEATH)
To: EveningStar
This is 2005, not 1861 or 1776.
No, 2005 may one day be spoken of just like 1776. 2005 may one day be known as a great turning point - a time when people spoke out against tyranny and cruelty - and won!
To: squirt-gun
No Michael Savage has been the best.
Savage has been kicking ass the last week.
110
posted on
03/23/2005 11:00:57 PM PST
by
Lori675
To: Lori675
I'm amazed she's survived 6 days without water and food in her condition.
111
posted on
03/23/2005 11:02:40 PM PST
by
Lori675
To: DustyMoment
AZ_Cowboy, You say,
Ann's never been wrong, yet.
Totally false.
She said Canada sent troops to Vietnam to help America.
She was wrong. Canada never sent troops.
She said the South was heroic to try to break away from the Union in the Civil War.
She was wrong and Licoln was right to stop the South.
112
posted on
03/23/2005 11:10:35 PM PST
by
Lori675
To: Rummyfan
Jeb is damned if he does act and damned if he doesn't act. He should go with act NOW !!! The death party will not love hime if he doesn't act, they showed that in their votes today.
To: AZ_Cowboy
Just one mistake in the article. Greer is a county probate judge not a state judge. He's never been a state judge.
114
posted on
03/24/2005 12:07:06 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Life support. canned, frozen or fresh, it's good for you!)
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
115
posted on
03/24/2005 3:08:45 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: Recovering_Democrat
116
posted on
03/24/2005 3:19:10 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Lori675
Actually, Lori, it is you who are wrong. Canada DID send troops and Lincoln, much as I admire him, violated the Constitution when he sent troops to force the Confederacy back into the Union.
117
posted on
03/24/2005 3:19:40 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(Repeal CFR NOW!!)
To: Lori675
Our founding fathers rightfully believed that our rights were not granted to us by man, but rather by God and that it was our right as citizens to refuse to submit to unjust laws. In our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote, "That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [to secure God-given rights], it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it." Furthermore, Benjamin Franklin said, "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God." In like manner, one of history's most respected church fathers, St. Augustine, said, "Evil law is no law at all."
An American Expat in Southeast Asia
118
posted on
03/24/2005 3:27:28 AM PST
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: IronJack
I was joking. However I did not know it was Drudge. Still looks like a mob guy in the photo.
119
posted on
03/24/2005 4:22:39 AM PST
by
duckman
(I refuse to use a tag line...I mean it.)
To: AZ_Cowboy
Well, you see, we are talking about
Michael's civil rights here, which are fully preserved under
Shar'ia law, which seems to be the controlling legal principle involved. The wife is a mere chattel, and no longer the possession of the birth parents. Michael is permitted to enforce whatever discipline upon her that he deems necessary, including calling for her death should she become inconvenient. Using the same latitude permitted under
Shar'ia law, Michael is permitted to take a second wife (or concubine) for purposes of procreation, that he may perpetuate his bloodline. Worked for Saddam Hussein, didn't it? Not to mention the Saudi royal family, in dozens if not hundreds of instances over the years.
Only in Arabic "honor" killings, not much is ever said by the general public.
120
posted on
03/24/2005 5:16:35 AM PST
by
alloysteel
("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson