Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Motivations of group attacking AARP include money, members and influence
Knight Ridder ^ | Mar. 23, 2005 | Steven Thomma

Posted on 03/23/2005 2:05:19 PM PST by Crackingham

Charlie Jarvis calls himself the "dynamite" that will blow up one of the biggest obstacles to partly privatizing Social Security: AARP, the powerful seniors' lobby that leads the opposition to privatization.

But Jarvis has another motive: He wants to take business away from AARP for his own much smaller group, the United Seniors Association, also known as USA Next.

Thus one little-noted aspect of the furious politics attending Social Security's fate is simply a fight over money, members and influence in Washington. If Jarvis can discredit AARP, he thinks his group stands to gain. So he's attacking AARP relentlessly, accusing it of being pro-tax increase, pro-gay marriage and even anti-U.S. military.

"If you are looking for an organization that will work to lower your taxes, not raise them, I invite you to take a look at USA Next," Jarvis said this week in an e-mail message to AARP members.

His group won publicity earlier this year when it ran an Internet ad attacking the AARP. It featured a photo of a soldier with an X through it and a second photo with a check mark of a gay couple kissing, apparently at their wedding. Said the caption: "The real AARP agenda."

AARP spokesman Steve Hahn dismissed the charges.

"We wholeheartedly support the troops," he said. He said AARP's Ohio chapter opposed a gay-marriage initiative because it believed it would restrict the rights of unmarried heterosexual couples.

The ad and the negative reaction to it set back USA Next just as it was attracting publicity. The White House backed off plans for a joint event in Florida with President Bush and the group's honorary chairman, Art Linkletter.

Jarvis refused either to defend or disavow the Internet ad. "It was removed. We didn't want it up," he said.

At the time, Jarvis said he was targeting AARP because it was fighting Bush's proposal to partly privatize Social Security. "AARP is the biggest boulder in the road to success on Social Security personal retirement accounts, and we are going to be the dynamite that removes it," he said.

He didn't mention his desire to take over some of AARP's considerable business. In 2003, the Washington-based AARP had revenues of $769 million, including $211 million in dues from its 36 million members, $300 million in royalties and fees from sales of services such as health insurance and $60 million in interest income.

Jarvis' goal is to convert 1 million AARP members in the coming year. That would transform his group into the kind of member-based organization its name implies, but which it's never been. In fact, the United Seniors Association is a somewhat shadowy group that's acted as a front for corporate interests seeking to influence federal legislation.

While pushing for a prescription-drug benefit under Medicare, for example, the group took $1.5 million from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, $664,000 from an industry group called Citizens for Better Medicare and $50,000 from drug giant Pfizer Inc. It also received $181,000 from Arctic Power, an Alaska consortium, to lobby for opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.

In 2003, the most recent year for which records are available, dues from members accounted for $1.2 million of USA Next's $25 million budget. The organization refused to say where the rest of its money came from. It also won't say how many dues-paying members it has. Jarvis is no stranger to the conservative cause. He's a former executive of Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian group, and won appointments to federal posts under Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush. He's chaired the United Seniors Association since 2001. It paid him $242,000 in 2003, the last year for which financial records are available.

Jarvis labels AARP as liberal in hope that conservative members will quit.

"We would be happy to take the 40 percent who are conservatives," he said. "That would be 12-13 million. One million would be wonderful."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: aarp; socialsecurity; usanext

1 posted on 03/23/2005 2:05:21 PM PST by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

"So he's attacking AARP relentlessly, accusing it of being pro-tax increase, pro-gay marriage and even anti-U.S. military."

Jarvis has the truth on his side so the forces of evilare running scared!


2 posted on 03/23/2005 2:08:46 PM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM. They can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
"AARP is the biggest boulder in the road to success on Social Security personal retirement accounts, and we are going to be the dynamite that removes it," he said.

Right, and the democrats are the biggest hemorrhoid in the rear of America.

3 posted on 03/23/2005 2:08:57 PM PST by RetiredArmy (Ted Kennedy is a democrat. Democrats are the enemy. Destroy your enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

I look forward to tomorrow's article on the motivations of those supporting AARP.



Hahahahaha that was a good one, I kill myself.


4 posted on 03/23/2005 2:10:09 PM PST by thoughtomator (Murder by Judges, 1 - 2 - 3, it's as easy to learn as your ABCBSCNNMSNBCs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Any article that works to publicize USA Next can only be a good thing. Seniors now know that they have another option and that they aren't stuck with a group that serves primarily as the right arm of the Dems.


5 posted on 03/23/2005 2:43:34 PM PST by onevoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Why would anyone think that the AARP is pro-tax increase, pro-gay marriage and even anti-U.S. military? I mean, other than by what they say and do.
6 posted on 03/23/2005 2:51:05 PM PST by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
Hmmm! Any relation to Howard Jarvis, of CA Proposition 13 fame? For those unaware, Prop 13, passed in the 70's, stopped the annual increase in property taxes when real estate prices were skyrocketing. Instead, the taxes would only increase when a house changed hands - at which time the new owner would get assessed at the price paid for the house.

Essentially, folks on social security or other fixed income who had bought a place for 10 or 20 grand were getting assessments of 100's of grand, but no way to afford 10 times the taxes.

Sure wish we had something like here in AZ, because now I'm in that position.

7 posted on 03/23/2005 4:40:08 PM PST by IonImplantGuru (Pereant qui ante nos nostra dixerunt. (May they perish who have expressed our bright ideas before us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson