Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.

Gibbs framed the complaint, already written probably sometime ago before the new de novo law, in the nature of an appeal, rather than in the nature of a de novo complaint. It is irrelevant what Greer did or did not do. Whittmore literally screamed out the roadmap for Gibbs. Gibbs needs to contact his malpractice carrier.


234 posted on 03/22/2005 7:34:17 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: Torie

Do you think that Wittmore treated the case as a de novo complaint?


277 posted on 03/22/2005 7:41:11 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
Whittmore literally screamed out the roadmap for Gibbs.

See, e.g., FN 3.

389 posted on 03/22/2005 7:55:34 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
Gibbs framed the complaint, already written probably sometime ago before the new de novo law, in the nature of an appeal,

I haven't read the ruling or his complaint. Did he name a defendant - and if so, who? I'm inferring from your comment that he named Greer, (as an appellee, as it were?)

743 posted on 03/22/2005 8:48:20 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
Whittmore literally screamed out the roadmap for Gibbs. Gibbs needs to contact his malpractice carrier.

That first footnote on Whittmore's opinion says it all. Gibbs did not connect the legal dots needed to create a successful argument.

I hope the appeal to the SCOTUS is better prepared.

2,374 posted on 03/23/2005 9:53:50 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson