Blake Speculates on Who Killed Wife

LOS ANGELES — In his first television appearance since being acquitted last week in the killing of his wife, actor Robert Blake (search) said Tuesday he does not know who killed Bonny Lee Bakley (search) but speculated it could have been "somebody whose father was taken for a ride."

Right, but you made a sweeping statement that all sex can lead to pregnancy, which is erroneous. Bakley obviously had a warm oven, she knew it and lied about it. She had given up on being a movie star, so she decided to entrap a movie star.

Like I said before, the real crime would have been her influence on the child. It wouldn't be surprising if she were selling nude photos of this child 10 years henceforth, if she wasn't dead.

Like I said before, the real crime would have been her influence on the child. It wouldn't be surprising if she were selling nude photos of this child 10 years henceforth, if she wasn't dead.

The real crime was her murder and that her murderer got away with it.

Bonnie had a lot of other children and she never put their photos on the net, so your arguement that she had to be killed to save the daughter doesn't hold water.

All he had to do was divorce her and ask for custody instead killing her.

All he had to do was divorce her and ask for custody instead killing her. Mr. Blake was found innocent, so this is another erroneous statement. Hundreds of men she manipulated and swindled had reason to kill her. She openly collaborated with her elder daughter on entrapping a celebrity by pregnancy, so I don't think you can put anything past her capacity for prostitution and mendacity.

Not guilty is not the same as innocent. He may have been found not guilty but not many people think he is innocent.

It doesn't matter what people think. What they 'think' is not what murder cases are decided upon. As I mentioned in another thread some days ago, when people (as they have regarding Blake) talk about how they 'think' he killed his wife, or they 'know' he 'did it', or they have a 'feeling', they're doing the very same thing that liberals and leftists do, they insist that their 'feelings' are correct, and that we should accept their 'feelings' in lieu of established, irrefutable fact.

So far as the court and the jury is concerned, there was no case as presented by the State of California, and they found him 'not guilty'.

It doesn't matter a tinker's damn what people may 'think', the only thing that matters is the evidence.

If people want to 'think' and 'feel' that Blake is guilty, their beef isn't with Blake or with the court or the jury, their beef is with law enforcment and the prosecutors for not finding credible evidence, and for not presenting such evidence to the jury.

"And dat's the name of dat tune."

Regards,

MM

It doesn't matter a tinker's damn what people may 'think', the only thing that matters is the evidence.

"Other's opinions" must matter to you since you are spending so much time on it.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.