[Mad Mammoth]

Not guilty is not the same as innocent. He may have been found not guilty but not many people think he is innocent.

It doesn't matter what people think. What they 'think' is not what murder cases are decided upon. As I mentioned in another thread some days ago, when people (as they have regarding Blake) talk about how they 'think' he killed his wife, or they 'know' he 'did it', or they have a 'feeling', they're doing the very same thing that liberals and leftists do, they insist that their 'feelings' are correct, and that we should accept their 'feelings' in lieu of established, irrefutable fact.

So far as the court and the jury is concerned, there was no case as presented by the State of California, and they found him 'not guilty'.

It doesn't matter a tinker's damn what people may 'think', the only thing that matters is the evidence.

If people want to 'think' and 'feel' that Blake is guilty, their beef isn't with Blake or with the court or the jury, their beef is with law enforcment and the prosecutors for not finding credible evidence, and for not presenting such evidence to the jury.

"And dat's the name of dat tune."

Regards,

MM

[usgator]

It doesn't matter a tinker's damn what people may 'think', the only thing that matters is the evidence.

"Other's opinions" must matter to you since you are spending so much time on it.