Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/22/2005 3:56:04 AM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Flavius

Missed it by seven years!

2 posted on 03/22/2005 4:00:08 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius


MY GOODNESS! They raised the age!

It's not like people are living longer, healthier lives these days. Nothing has changed since they instituted the age!


3 posted on 03/22/2005 4:11:15 AM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Recruiting is hard up. I could be retired before some people even enlist. That's scary. It's too bad it came to this, but the personnel shortage is on the brink of disaster. It's a shame that the military didn't fix retention at the right end, and instead is just looking to pull more people off the streets in the hope they stay in long enough to be replaced. Even that's a losing strategy, but at least its sustainable.

The only way to really fix this is to attract the right kind of soldiers, and to do the right things to keep them in. We don't do either anymore.

4 posted on 03/22/2005 4:15:04 AM PST by Steel Wolf (Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules. Mark it zero, Dude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

We need to raise the mininum age to 21 since 18 yearolds can't be trusted to drink.


18 posted on 03/22/2005 6:12:13 AM PST by biblewonk (Neither was the man created for woman but the woman for the man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
The problem with this is that in the 4 1/2 years since 9/11, those who were within this increased enlistment age limit and were turned away due to being "too old" are still deemed too old and turned away.
21 posted on 03/22/2005 6:58:29 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius; Mama_Bear; Howlin; onyx; Old Sarge; All

AWESOME! Next step: raise the army's active duty age requirement to 39 or 40 a.s.a.p.


24 posted on 03/23/2005 3:17:31 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to be as shamless for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; Mama_Bear; shield; lara; Jim Robinson; notpoliticallycorewrecked; JustAmy; FresnoArmyBrat; ...
This is a terrific first step in line with my earlier thread. click on the following link: Open letter to Bush, Congress, Rush, Hannity, and Freepers re military age requirments.
25 posted on 03/23/2005 4:37:46 AM PST by tame (Are you willing to be as shamless for the truth as leftists are for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

They raised the age...

Why would the army want a 33yr old husband and father of 2(4yr and 3 week old)?


37 posted on 03/23/2005 7:10:01 AM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Ping me when they get to 59.


41 posted on 03/23/2005 7:23:30 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Time to bring back the draft. Seriously.


57 posted on 03/23/2005 11:48:44 AM PST by Ronzo (God ALONE is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson