Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContraryMary
I do not withdraw my statement. Hammesfahr is a quack.

You should withdraw your statement. First of all you provided no evidence supportin your claim and second of all when I went to your website and clicked on his name after a search I ended up in the ether. Now I know why you haven't presented any evidence supporting your assertion.

More to the point, Hammersfahr's case was adjudicated in the Florida "Courts" and he came out with license and reputation intact. Now, you're a big believer in Florida Courts, how come you don't support them in this case?

682 posted on 03/22/2005 6:21:15 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

Because you haven't taken the time to sift through all the information about Hammesfahr on www.quackwatch.org does not mean it doesn't exist. It's there for anyone who wants to take the time to check it out.


690 posted on 03/22/2005 6:23:19 AM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson