Skip to comments.
(Florida State Supreme Court) Order Dismissing for Lack of Jurisdiction
Florida Supreme Court ^
| March 21, 2005
Posted on 03/21/2005 9:57:11 PM PST by bd476
Supreme Court of Florida
MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2005
CASE NO.: SC05-460
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM
OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES vs. MICHAEL SCHIAVO, ET AL.
___________________________________________________________________
Petitioner(s) Respondent(s)
The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because there is no independent basis alleged to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.
A True Copy
Test:
kd Served:
KERRY W. KIRCHER
GERALDINE R. GENNET
DAVID PLOTINSKY
DAVID CHARLES GIBBS, III
GEORGE J. FELOS
DEBORAH BUSHNELL
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 last
To: Tax Government
Me too..if Terri dies I will never set foot on Florida soil again.
101
posted on
03/21/2005 11:07:27 PM PST
by
Earthdweller
(US descendant of French Protestants)
To: bd476
I'm sorry Mo1. Sure didn't mean to upset anyone. It's ok, I'm not upset .. I was just in a state of confusion
Which is not unusual for me .. *L*
102
posted on
03/21/2005 11:23:46 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
To: Nick Danger
How can anyone snub Congressional subpoena power. Isn't it absolute?
103
posted on
03/21/2005 11:41:42 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Demand Mexico Turnover Fugitive Murderers: http://www.escapingjustice.com)
To: Midwestguy
So the FL district court does not at this point stand in comptempt of the congressional subpoena. Rather, the court merely denied their intervention. Congress is currently appealing that ruling. By going to the Florida Supremes on the writs, Congress made what was essentially an interlocutory appeal to the Florida Supremes in an effort to do an "end run" of the Florida Appellate court, at least until they had made a final ruling.
By denying that interlocutory appeal, the matter of intervention is stuck in the Florida Appellate Court and there is no other avenue, at least in the Florida state courts, to get reinsertion of the tube, as the matter awaits appellate review.
In the meantime, the subpoenas have been served and could still be enforced on March 25th. The problem with that is that the tube will have been out one week. This means that the decision of the federal judge will determine whether there is any reinsertion between now and the 25th.
To: All; Ohioan from Florida; amdgmary
So ARE Greer, Schiavo, and hospice in Contempt of Congress or not?
Seems to me THAT was one possible remedy to today's standoff, a perfect excuse to send in the marshalls since all of them
(Greer/Schiavo/hospice) conspired to ignore the Congressonal subpoenas, and yank the tube.
To: FL_engineer
Based on Midwestguy's analysis of the legal situation, no contempt situation exists until the effective date of the subpoenas passes, March 25th. The attempt by Congress to intervene in the guardianship matter was an attempt to have the feeding tube reinserted pending the effective date of those subpoenas.
To: skinkinthegrass
I don't think so. This is from the Florida Supreme Court, not the federal judge.
107
posted on
03/22/2005 12:05:44 AM PST
by
Bubbatuck
(Demonrats: The End is Near!)
To: Nightshift
108
posted on
03/22/2005 2:58:37 AM PST
by
tutstar
( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
To: Don'tMessWithTexas
> Based on Midwestguy's analysis of the legal situation, no contempt situation exists until the effective date of the subpoenas passes, March 25th.
Part of the subpoena conditions are that the subpoenaed witness(es) be protected from injury or harm. The longer Terri goes without a feeding tube, she is being harmed which is obviously a source of potential contempt.
109
posted on
03/22/2005 3:14:31 AM PST
by
l.tecolote
(doing what I can from California)
To: bd476
Can't we get Al Sharpton to file suit in the World Court at the Hague?
To: bd476
111
posted on
03/22/2005 4:52:23 AM PST
by
OPS4
(worth repeating)
To: thoughtomator
To: Torie; Howlin
"Whatever it is, it appears to be stale as it were. I guess there were some more dangling participles as silly as the subpoena thingie. The foreplay is over. We are now down to brass tacks."
Kinda like getting ones panties in a wad over nothing?
To: Smartaleck
I made an error, see the followup comments. I thought it was a different court.
114
posted on
03/22/2005 5:24:09 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Will Michael Schiavo get away with murdering his wife? Stay tuned to find out!)
To: onyx
115
posted on
03/22/2005 6:07:55 AM PST
by
null and void
(Do your part to save Social Security. Die.)
To: l.tecolote; Don'tMessWithTexas; Midwestguy
Based on Midwestguy's analysis of the legal situation, no contempt situation exists until the effective date of the subpoenas passes, March 25th. Good Friday...
116
posted on
03/22/2005 6:16:51 AM PST
by
null and void
(Do your part to save Social Security. Die.)
To: null and void
117
posted on
03/22/2005 8:15:57 AM PST
by
onyx
(Robert Frost "Good fences make good neighbors." Build the fence, Mr. President and Congress.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-117 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson