Skip to comments.
(Florida State Supreme Court) Order Dismissing for Lack of Jurisdiction
Florida Supreme Court ^
| March 21, 2005
Posted on 03/21/2005 9:57:11 PM PST by bd476
Supreme Court of Florida
MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2005
CASE NO.: SC05-460
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM
OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES vs. MICHAEL SCHIAVO, ET AL.
___________________________________________________________________
Petitioner(s) Respondent(s)
The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because there is no independent basis alleged to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.
A True Copy
Test:
kd Served:
KERRY W. KIRCHER
GERALDINE R. GENNET
DAVID PLOTINSKY
DAVID CHARLES GIBBS, III
GEORGE J. FELOS
DEBORAH BUSHNELL
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: onyx
Well fine and great, but we still should fix the mistake. This is a non-issue now.
To: KDD
No its called a balk.. they are going to get Fed courts decide now.
42
posted on
03/21/2005 10:14:41 PM PST
by
Next_Time_NJ
(NJ demorat exterminator)
To: thoughtomator
"directly defying an act of Congress"
Are you serious ..?? This is crazy.
43
posted on
03/21/2005 10:15:08 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
To: Nick Danger
OK, now can the House order the whole SCOFflaw to be hauled up to DC to answer?
To: HiTech RedNeck
Hello.
The note was to Petronski.
He's single, and so's bd.
45
posted on
03/21/2005 10:16:14 PM PST
by
onyx
(Robert Frost "Good fences make good neighbors." Build the fence, Mr. President and Congress.)
To: Admin Moderator
Please could this be removed from breaking news so no one gets the wrong idea or becomes unduly upset? Thanks.
46
posted on
03/21/2005 10:16:29 PM PST
by
bd476
(I may not like the law of gravity but I find that it's best to make the attempt to obey it.)
To: onyx
oh, far from me to bust up a courtship.
To: Nick Danger
Yes. This is building toward a Constitutional crisis. Who is in charge? Possible .. sure looks like a battle between the courts and the legislative branch
And the Fl courts are sticking their thumb in the legislative branch's eye
48
posted on
03/21/2005 10:16:48 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
To: CyberAnt
Ahh.. sorry I misread it, wrong court.
49
posted on
03/21/2005 10:16:52 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Death to Terri! Death to Israel! Death to the Great Satan!)
To: Nick Danger
I'm not sure now who the controlling authority is now.
The last thing we need is a turf war.
It should never have come to this.
50
posted on
03/21/2005 10:16:55 PM PST
by
KDD
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
This appears to be throwing out the Congressional subpoena of Terri on final appeal, but I'll check further.So an unelected demon in a black robe is over riding the nations elected law makers? This judge is an unconstitutional dictator.
Congress cannot let this ride, or every left wing Marxist activist judge in the nation will demand we bow and obey.
I certainly hope that's not what this means, because if it is, the leaders in Washington had better put their foot down once and for all. Enough activist judges already!
To: Midwestguy
Thanks for the clarification, you are correct.
52
posted on
03/21/2005 10:17:33 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Death to Terri! Death to Israel! Death to the Great Satan!)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Just trying my hand at matchmakin' lol.
53
posted on
03/21/2005 10:17:55 PM PST
by
onyx
(Robert Frost "Good fences make good neighbors." Build the fence, Mr. President and Congress.)
To: bd476
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LAST NIGHTS CONGRESSIONAL ACT THIS IS A SEPERATE CASE! DONT CONFUSE THEM!
54
posted on
03/21/2005 10:17:57 PM PST
by
Next_Time_NJ
(NJ demorat exterminator)
To: KDD
To: bd476
Hopefully we will see some judicial impeachments come out of this.
56
posted on
03/21/2005 10:19:08 PM PST
by
Tuefel Hunden
(Once a Marine, always a Marine)
To: HiTech RedNeck
No court, federal or state, can rule on any matter unless that court has jurisdiction to hear that matter. It appears that Congress sought relief from the state courts, but their petition for relief did not state a basis for Florida state jurisdiction. Hence, the Florida Supremes have no basis to rule on the merits of Congress' request.
To: Next_Time_NJ
Uh, actually it means quite a bit. This is a subpeona from the US Congress. Congress most definitely has jurisdiction to issue subpeonas. They also have the capacity to enforce them.
And the Florida SC has just told Congress to get lost. People go to jail for that.
58
posted on
03/21/2005 10:21:12 PM PST
by
Havoc
(Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
To: concerned about politics
So an unelected demon in a black robe is over riding the nations elected law makers? Sure looks that way
59
posted on
03/21/2005 10:21:19 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
To: Havoc
Subpeonas and what they did last night are two different issues.. We are in Fed court now.. this is beyound the State's courts reach..
60
posted on
03/21/2005 10:22:19 PM PST
by
Next_Time_NJ
(NJ demorat exterminator)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson