Skip to comments.
Camilla 'set to become Queen'
Press Association (UK)
| March 21, 2005
Posted on 03/21/2005 1:59:08 PM PST by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
1
posted on
03/21/2005 1:59:08 PM PST
by
HAL9000
To: HAL9000
The Prince's aides did admit, when the royal engagement was announced, that legislation might be needed to tidy the issue up later on.So, has Chuckie just been caught trying to snooker his subjects...?
2
posted on
03/21/2005 2:00:06 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: HAL9000
Reality is that Charles will never be King, so the issue is moot. That is why Mummy allowed him to get his horse.
3
posted on
03/21/2005 2:00:20 PM PST
by
ikka
To: HAL9000
Yet another reason to be glad that Cornwallis sent out his aide to surrender.
4
posted on
03/21/2005 2:02:36 PM PST
by
VRWCisme
To: HAL9000
she will be referred to as the Princess Consort That's a very fitting title for a homewrecker.
5
posted on
03/21/2005 2:02:53 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: VRWCisme
God Save the Queen, 'cos tourists are money.
6
posted on
03/21/2005 2:03:33 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: HAL9000; MadIvan
To: HAL9000
The thing about being a subject is that you don't get to pick your monarchs. If people don't like the idea of genuflecting before Camilla, let them apply for US citizenship.
8
posted on
03/21/2005 2:05:47 PM PST
by
Physicist
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: SandyInSeattle
He really should have married her in the first place, saved everyone lots of grief. Course, the future king wouldn't be so dang good looking . . .
10
posted on
03/21/2005 2:07:12 PM PST
by
pa mom
To: HAL9000
NEVER, NEVER, NEVER will Parker Bowles become queen. Below is the only true Queen of England.
11
posted on
03/21/2005 2:08:50 PM PST
by
GunnyHartman
(Allah is allah outta virgins.)
To: pa mom
He really should have married her in the first place, saved everyone lots of grief. Course, the future king wouldn't be so dang good looking . . Agreed, he should have. Of course, Mr. Parker-Bowles might have had something to say about it...
12
posted on
03/21/2005 2:10:50 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: mewzilla
13
posted on
03/21/2005 2:11:09 PM PST
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: HAL9000
Terri's life is hanging by a thread.
Jessica Lundsford was murdered.
The trial of the pervert who killed the little girl in Calif a couple years ago and thrown on the side of the road is about to begin.
And we CARE whether Bowles becomes Queen or NOT???? Dear God...this society has really gone ballistic. Who cares whether she becomes Queen? Is that news? Will it change the world? Will it save the world? Will it save murdered children? Will it keep children from being kidnapped? Will it save murdered babies in the womb?
What a silly, silly, unimportant irrelevant story. Incredible...absolutely out and out incredible. I'm in awe of what is considered news these days.
14
posted on
03/21/2005 2:11:46 PM PST
by
cubreporter
(I trust and admire Rush. He has done more for this country than he will ever know. God bless him.)
To: HAL9000
Coincidently, "Queenie" is the 13th most popular name for female dogs.
15
posted on
03/21/2005 2:12:28 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: HAL9000
Ah, the lovely Camilla is indeed an appropriate choice by the imbecilic Charles to be Queen of England!
The Royal family is intellectually bankrupt with all members being about as intelligent as a bag of rocks.
It's indeed unfortunate for The United Kingdom that their entire Royal Family is the worst in European history. Yes, I know that takes in a lot of territory.
16
posted on
03/21/2005 2:13:27 PM PST
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal Today)
To: cubreporter
I can't believe you took the time to write that long a response to a thread you consider unnewsworthy!
Wouldn't that time have been better spent rereading something more important?
17
posted on
03/21/2005 2:13:51 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Physicist
The thing about being a subject is that you don't get to pick your monarchs. If people don't like the idea of genuflecting before Camilla, let them apply for US citizenship.
LOL. Been there, done that. A few generations ago. Best darn decision the family ever made :)
18
posted on
03/21/2005 2:14:03 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: cubreporter
Oh come on, do you really think that any of us are losing sleep or expending much mental energy thinking about Camilla? Of course not. But sometimes it's nice to have a thread about something not as meaningful and intense as life and death. (And of course, issues of morality do come into play, even with a thread like this one.)
19
posted on
03/21/2005 2:15:52 PM PST
by
VRWCisme
To: cubreporter
It reminds me of the headline from The Onion's "Our Dumb Century", regarding the abdication of King Edward VIII:
December 10, 1936
Meaningless Figurehead Abdicates Meaningless Role
___________________________
World Captivate by Powerless Monarch's Decision to Give Up Irrelevant Position to Marry Divorcee
20
posted on
03/21/2005 2:18:35 PM PST
by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
