Posted on 03/21/2005 11:17:30 AM PST by quidnunc
Are you thinking what Im thinking? Is the unimaginable about to happen and the Conservative Party to snatch triumph from near-extinction by winning the general election?
Even to ask the question is to acknowledge the seemingly overwhelming odds against such a suggestion. For the Tories to achieve the electoral swing needed to overturn Labours massive majority would entail, in the eyes of many, the biggest comeback since Lazarus.
But we live in disoriented and volatile times. Polls fluctuate; and the Tories have recently been dissolving Labours lead like a blow-torch on an ice sculpture.
Beyond the polls, there is now a distinct feeling that something intangible has shifted in the political ether. It is not just the palpable panic in the Governments ranks over the inadequacy of Alan Milburns tactics as Labours election mastermind, or the desperately forced shows of unity between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown to conceal the profound fissure at the very heart of government.
More than that, there seems to have been a subtle but perceptible shift in the national mood. Even last weeks pork-barrel Budget left people looking askance. For they have begun to hear once again a sound that had almost disappeared from the national memory. It is the sound of the Conservatives voice.
For the past few weeks, the Tory leader Michael Howard has been setting the political agenda. In the past, I have not been one of Mr Howards biggest fans. There was too much about him that seemed nakedly opportunist. And there are still huge holes in the Tories thinking. On the NHS, for example, they remain too timid about restructuring a system that is fundamentally bust. And their continued refusal to address the scourge of family breakdown, the single most important cause of so many social ills, remains a serious flaw.
-snip-
the rest...
Nevertheless, on important issue after issue Mr Howard has recently been scoring direct hits upon the government, forcing it painfully onto the back foot. In short, at this eleventh hour he has turned the Tories back into a real opposition.
It started with asylum and immigration, when Mr Howard went for the jugular by daring to confront the fact that the root causes of this crisis lay in international treaties. By boldly proposing to tear up or alter Britains membership of these treaties, Mr Howard provided at last a clear alternative that left the Government badly winded.
Next, he has made highly effective use of the experiences of individuals, such as Margaret Dixons repeatedly cancelled shoulder operation or Maria Hutchingss autistic child, to dramatise the conspicuous failure in the public services.
But maybe his most important development has been to start saying the unsayable. On issue after issue bringing down the time limit for abortion, amending or abolishing human rights law, or now further attacking the way this has permitted travellers to drive a caravan and horses through the planning laws he is at last giving voice to the silent majority who feel utterly disenfranchised by a political and legal class that seems to have taken leave of its senses.
Believing that they themselves are decent, tolerant, law-abiding people, this beleaguered majority feels that the middle ground they inhabit has been hijacked and worse that no-one sticks up for common-sense or justice, because to do so is to invite ridicule or vilification. It is hard to over-estimate public fury at this systematic upending of the notion of right and wrong, and the corresponding relief that a politician has summoned the courage to break the taboo against challenging it.
The key to Mr Howards new approach is surely his Australian strategist Lynton Crosby, the architect of Australian Prime Minister John Howards electoral victory. As an outsider, Mr Crosby is obviously uncorrupted by the single most crippling factor that has brought the Tories to their knees their belief in Tony Blairs own mythology.
Their view that Mr Blair was riding high on social and cultural change pushed them into becoming Blairite wannabes. But the lesson of the last few weeks is that when Mr Blairs balloon is popped, he disintegrates. This was spectacularly proved after the Budget, when the Prime Minister was publicly humiliated by media attacks exposing the whopper he was telling about the Tories intention to cut £35 billion from public spending when in fact they plan to increase it.
Because Mr Blair is so widely distrusted, he has become his partys liability. By contrast, Gordon Brown is widely respected for his stewardship of the economy. And conventional wisdom holds that while people feel prosperous, they wont unseat the government.
But much of the reason for this prosperity is that the Chancellor diminished his potential to wreck the economy when he gave independence to the Bank of England. Since the Tories will not reverse this, economics has been largely removed from party political considerations.
As a result, people now take prosperity for granted. What concerns them much more is the black hole into which billions of public money are being poured, along with their sense that the countrys values are being destroyed by a sneering, out of touch, metropolitan elite.
In other words, social and cultural matters are uppermost in peoples minds. Thats why issues such as abortion, immigration or the wrongs done by human rights law are striking such a chord. Its why the government is suddenly running scared over cannabis reclassification.
Some Labour politicians, such as the partys strategic thinker Douglas Alexander, have realised that values are the key. But those on his list merely display the partys bankruptcy of vision. He cites international development, family values and the NHS. But the NHS is bust; this government has dismembered the family and ritually sacrificed its entrails; and as for international development, when the Prime Minister starts boasting about saving Africa its time to send in the removal men.
How all this will actually stack up at the election, though, is anyones guess. The electorates disillusionment with all politicians runs very deep indeed. And the whiff of Tory opportunism is far from having been dispelled.
But the Tories are now being listened to because they have stumbled across a truth they previously failed to grasp. Far from being a conservative, Tony Blair stands for the counter-culture. Until very recently, the Tories allowed that to go by default. Now, by smashing taboos and confronting issues such as travellers' illegal camps, immigration, abortion and human rights they are issuing at last a challenge to this Governments rotten culture of sentimentalised amorality and the undermining of our national culture and institutions and the rule of law itself.
People have long been disillusioned with the Blair government but felt no alternative was on offer. Elections, after all, are about choice. If no choice is available, people will not vote. But if they feel the Tories are presenting a credible alternative, a tipping point might well be reached when the whole electoral centre of gravity suddenly shifts and overnight those poll findings can be turned on their head.
Anything can happen in these most confused and uncertain of times. But if Mr Howards highly effective smash-and-grab raids develop into a sustained and coherent vision which chimes with the beleaguered majority, the unthinkable might just happen.
Let's see what some of the other British FReepers have to say.
(And let me add a hearty welcome to FR.)
Thanks.
I agree. Labour will be re-elected.
But with a much decreased majority. Which should make things interesting.
Nice to see the Tories making the political running for a change though.
Why is it that English-speaking regions (US, Australia, Britain, Canada minus Quebec) are becoming more conservative while most everyone else is becoming more socialist?
Thank you.
You're a quick study!
And, welcome to FR!
I agree with you Britain is moving right but unfortunately not in time or enough IMHO to win the next election.
The move towards the Tories cannot be to do with the Iraq war because Michael Howard has clearly stated that he does not agree with the premise of how we went to war but he backs the removal of Saddam and he will not be bringing the troops home until their work is accomplished.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.