Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"When Is That Bitch Gonna Die?" - Micheal Schiavo
BlueStarBase.org ^ | 3-21-2005 | Barbara Stanley

Posted on 03/21/2005 7:50:03 AM PST by Pendragon_6

Lets see, first Michael Schiavo beats and strangles his wife Terri, leaves her lying unconscious on the floor until her family arrives to get her to the hospital.

Then Michael Schiavo sues the hospital for $20 million because he needs the money to get his poor wife therapy.

Then Michael Schiavo pockets the money, denies his wife the care he said she needed and finally, claims she really wants to die.

Michael Schiavo killed his wife Terri's cat, melted down her wedding ring and then took up with his girlfriend and lives with her today with their children. Does this sound like a loving husband who really cares about his wife's wishes?

And what do we get on the tube every hour on the hour: “persistent vegetative state” as though any of the talking heads who ghoulishly proclaim Terri's life isn't worth that of a convicted serial killer sitting on death row (for 20 years, while due process goes on).

Michael Schiavo's supporters claim he loved his wife Terri enough to take a nursing degree so that he could take care of her. I think he got that nursing degree so he could inject her with insulin and hasten her death and his complete claim to all the money he won in litigation.

Just take a gander at the sworn testimony of an attending nurse: Carla Sauer Iyer (affidavit* below) but let me save you some time and report a quote of Michael Schiavo's after visiting his still living wife: "When is that bitch gonna die?"

Hmmm. Loving husband or man so afraid of not only not getting the money (what's left of the $20 million) but the prospect of facing a jury for his attempted murder, a charge which is possible as long as Terri lives. Sounds like motive to me.

Michael Schiavo says Terri said she never wanted to be kept alive on machines. Okay. Even if that was her statement (which there is absolutely no corroborating testimony and quite the unusual statement coming from a young, newly married woman still in her twenties and full of life); Terri is not being kept alive by machines!

Terri has a feeding tube from which she gets food and water. Had she had the care and therapy she was entitled to, there is every chance today Terri would be divorced from that louse and feeding herself just fine.

About that “loving husband” crapola: what husband do you know evinces his marital fidelity and love by living with another woman, having children with that woman and dumps his wife in a hospice while waiting for her to die? What loving husband kills his sick wife's pet? What loving husband denies his wife's family visitation?

I ask these questions because the media morons are still stuck with their new term: “persistent vegetative state” and are oblivious to the actual facts of this tragic case.

Continued


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: deathocrats; feminism; feminist; husbandbashing; manhating; michealschiavo; ojsimpson; quotes; robertblake; schiavo; scottpeterson; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 581-598 next last
To: Edward Watson

Amen.


141 posted on 03/21/2005 8:57:57 AM PST by PresbyRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger
What I do know is that having the courts, or government body, make this decision is the worst of all outcomes.

Having put to rest several loved ones, thankfully NOT one of my children, I agree. I can think of nothing more horrendous then laying to rest one of my kids. The doctors state that she is beyond coming back, so letting her go would be the best thing. Getting the Feds involved is a disaster.
142 posted on 03/21/2005 8:57:57 AM PST by HMFIC (Fourth Generation American INFIDEL and PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: spoiler2

"Feeding tube" means the same as the "Umbilical cord" for the NOW feminazis and the far left. In their evil minds both can and should be cut. Murder by any other name is still murder.


143 posted on 03/21/2005 8:58:32 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Interesting point (your reference to all of this being "hearsay"), but, legally speaking, isn't his claim that, "Terri told me she wouldn't want to live like this" also hearsay - especially in light of the fact that the treatment and rahabilitation he has denied her since was the basis of his lawsuit?


144 posted on 03/21/2005 8:59:09 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HMFIC

Go back to your DUngeon!


145 posted on 03/21/2005 8:59:30 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit; Edward Watson
>"Your post is right on the money but will not prevent hostile attacks on you and your view. My experience with my wife's death was similiar to your's and in NO case would I try and put her through this horror one second longer than she had to tolerate. And I loved her more than life itself."

You two gentlemen have my sympathies. I am not attacking either one of you, and I believe you both when you both say you loved your wives very much.

So in that vein, I'm going to ask you a very personal question, which by no means do I want you to answer here on the Internet, unless you feel compelled to do so;

Did either of you ever feel like going out and fathering a couple kids with another woman, while still married to your wife? That's what this man did, and I've never seen anyone make marital vows that included that caveat. Regardless of her vegetative state not withstanding, that is NOT true love. I'm sorry, but it's not.

146 posted on 03/21/2005 8:59:37 AM PST by FBD ("A nation without borders is not a nation." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: 80sReaganite

Of course it's an "artificial treatment." Never in human history have we been able to keep people in her condition alive by inserting a tube directly into her stomach.

Michael's actions are not at all suspicious. One simply cannot disregard the first eight years of his strenuously trying to find a cure for her before giving up and accepting her wishes that she not be kept in a vegetitative state.

Sure he moved on and found another and has several young children. Why do some condemn him for that? He must not be denied the right to find some happiness and a family. His wife effectively died fifteen years ago. Only her physical body is still alive.

When my wife was dying from cervical cancer, we discontinued feeding her several days before she passed away and just focused on keeping her comfortable. Were we guilty of trying to starve her to death?

A good husband doesn't absolve himself of his responsibility to his wife to her parents. I didn't abdicate my responsibility towards my wife but followed her wishes until the very end no matter how opposed my in-laws were.


147 posted on 03/21/2005 9:00:57 AM PST by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

However, the beating of Terri has not been established as fact, near as I can tell.

======

That's why Judge Greer has lovingly ordered Mikey to CREMATE Terry
IMMEDIATELY after she dies... with NO AUTOPSY allowed !!!



148 posted on 03/21/2005 9:02:07 AM PST by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HMFIC

From what I understand (there is so much conflicting information it is unbelievable) Michael was offered the option of Terry's parents taking over custody of Terry. He could have then just walked away. Why hasn't he done so?

It appears he is bent on killing her. This is morally reprehensible. You know the old saying "just because it is legal doesn't make it right."


149 posted on 03/21/2005 9:02:11 AM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HMFIC

No, this is typical of the made-up-from-whole-cloth crap that's been floating around this case.


150 posted on 03/21/2005 9:02:15 AM PST by genefromjersey (So much to flame;so little time !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Sorry, wrong person. I don't have an account there. Do you?


151 posted on 03/21/2005 9:02:53 AM PST by HMFIC (Fourth Generation American INFIDEL and PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: wvjim

This is precisely why I used the term "artificial treatment" instead of "artificial resuscitation" since never in human history have we possessed the ability to implant a tube directly into a patient's stomach to keep them alive.


152 posted on 03/21/2005 9:03:21 AM PST by Edward Watson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ariamne

People's reactions to tramatic events should NOT be taken as "proof". I tend to laugh at inopportune times, really I can't help it. It drives my wife nuts. The thought that this intrinsic psychological quirk of mine would cause people to think I had done something that I didn't in a COURT OF LAW disgusts me to no end. The fact that Michael moved in with another woman while his wife has been brain dead(I'm not going to debate that part here) since 1990!!!!, means nothing to me. Some people here expect him to lead the life of a priest while his wife is a vegetable for 15 years!!!


153 posted on 03/21/2005 9:04:07 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

In YOUR view.

What IF, Terri had TOLD HIM that she would NEVER want to live in a vegetative state and he was merely FOLLOWING UP on it?

Again, unless you were sitting there listening, you don't know.


154 posted on 03/21/2005 9:04:13 AM PST by HMFIC (Fourth Generation American INFIDEL and PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: HMFIC

"Did I know your niece?
If not, see a shrink, you're a nut job."

You obviously don't think before you open your mouth. That's what my comment was meant to show you. You should think before you make blanket, uninformed judgements.

Like "...see a shrink, you're a nut job."


155 posted on 03/21/2005 9:04:15 AM PST by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: sagebrush58

Indeed it would provide a check and balance. Also, since the 18th century, the level of maturity of many young adults / couples has, sadly, declined so severely, vs 200 years ago, that the parental voice may still be needed in certain cases. Sad but true.


156 posted on 03/21/2005 9:04:18 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey

With the resultant nut jobs rising to the fray.


157 posted on 03/21/2005 9:04:42 AM PST by HMFIC (Fourth Generation American INFIDEL and PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

I have heard that the MS's mother worked for the county sheriff.


158 posted on 03/21/2005 9:05:09 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

It's also legally actionable


159 posted on 03/21/2005 9:05:11 AM PST by Military family member (If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Military family member

I have heard this several times....

Also, the spending of the lawsuit money has been approved by the court.




Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, it was.

Now, consider this.

The court, The Judge of that court (and who would that be?), that is in GUARDIANSHIP of her ESTATE, allowed money from that estate which was to be spent on her REHAB,to be spent by MICHAEL on a EUTHANASIA ADVOCATE LAWYER to have her put to death.

Think of that. The Court that was entrusted with ENSURING THE MONEY WAS SPENT ON TERRI's rehab and care, ALLOWED THE MONEY to be spent on efforts to kill her.

THAT is a violation of the terms of that guardianship.

NOW, WHO AUTHORIZED SPENDING THAT MONEY????? SOMEONE TELL ME THE NAME.


160 posted on 03/21/2005 9:06:02 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 581-598 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson