Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC Considers Restricting Online Political Activities ( Web Ads, Bloggers' Endorsements)
Washington Post ^ | March 21, 2005 | Brian Faler

Posted on 03/20/2005 10:23:38 PM PST by Former Military Chick

The Federal Election Commission has begun considering whether to issue new rules on how political campaigns are waged on the Internet, a regulatory process that is expected to take months to complete but that is already generating considerable angst online.

The agency is weighing whether -- and how -- to impose restrictions on a host of online activities, including campaign advertising and politically oriented blogs.

Election officials are reluctantly taking up the issue, after losing a court case last fall. The FEC, which enforces federal election law, had issued scores of regulations delineating how the campaign finance reform legislation adopted in 2002 ought to be implemented. But Reps. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) and Martin T. Meehan (D-Mass.), who sponsored the legislation, complained that many of those rules were too lax, and they successfully sued to have them rescinded. The commission must now rewrite a number of those directions, including ones that left online political activities virtually free from government regulation.

"We are almost certainly going to move from an environment in which the Internet was per se not regulated to where it is going to be regulated in some part," said FEC Commissioner David M. Mason, a Republican. "That shift has huge significance because it means that people who are conducting political activity on the Internet are suddenly going to have to worry about or at least be conscious of certain legal distinctions and lines they didn't used to have to worry about."

Which people, what activities and where those lines should be drawn, though, have yet to be determined.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloggers; campaignfinance; endorsements; fec; firstamendment; freespeech; webads
Actually I thought this would be addressed a while back. Ho hummmmmm
1 posted on 03/20/2005 10:23:42 PM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Christopher Shays (R-Conn.)

Why does that name sound familiar ... hmmm... ?

2 posted on 03/20/2005 10:35:10 PM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Will the FEC also include the program content of television shows?


3 posted on 03/20/2005 10:37:01 PM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

I'll be reserving a .fi domain just in case.

Regulate THIS, FEC!


4 posted on 03/20/2005 10:52:10 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick; Jim Robinson; kristinn
You have no doubt about where I stand on this intended new violation of the First Amendment by the FEC. That Commission will conduct a public hearing on its final proposal.

Jim, would you like me to go to that hearing, which the FEC is required to hold, as the official representative of FreeRepublic? I have practiced before the FEC decades ago. The fee for my doing that would be, of course, $0. Let me know if I can be of service.

John / Billybob

5 posted on 03/20/2005 11:08:06 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (Proud to be a FORMER member of the Bar of the US Supreme Court since July, 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick; All

Menace in Black II- The FEC vs. Blogs
v | 03-05-05 | the heavy equipment guy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1356565/posts


6 posted on 03/21/2005 12:14:05 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Now, again, why did George Bush sign this bill?

The Stench from PEW (vidoetape exposes phony buzz created for McCain-Feingold CFR) - New York Post, Editorial, March 21, 2005 - posted to Free Republic, March 21 2005, by Liz:

A former program officer for Pew, Sean Treglia, was caught on videotape bragging about how the foundation worked behind the scenes to create the false impression that there was a "mass movement" afoot clamoring for campaign-finance reform...

Pew did this in the run-up to the passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 — a.k.a. McCain-Feingold — by spreading around more than $40 million to grass-roots front groups like Common Cause, the Campaign Finance Institute and the inaptly named Center for Public Integrity...

Several other major liberal foundations — including the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation and George Soros' Open Society Institute — colluded with Pew to give $123 million between 1994 and 2004 to promote the regulation of political speech.

But Pew's role in the effort seems to have been particularly insidious.

"Having been on the Hill, I knew that . . . if Congress thought this was a Pew effort, it'd be worthless. It'd be 20 million bucks thrown down the drain," Treglia says at one point in the tape.

"So, in order, in essence, to convey the impression that this was something coming naturally from outside the Beltway, I felt it was best that Pew stay in the background."

"By law, the grantees always have to disclose. But I always encouraged the grantees never to mention Pew," Treglia says. "Did we push the envelope? Yeah. Were we encouraged internally to push the envelope? Yeah . . . We stayed within the letter, if not the spirit, of the law."


7 posted on 03/21/2005 5:56:19 AM PST by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute

bttt


8 posted on 03/21/2005 5:57:19 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson