Skip to comments.
Terri Schiavo's family have been denied all visitation per Terri's sister
Posted on 03/20/2005 12:29:52 PM PST by kcvl
Per Fox News...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; parentsrights; schiavo; terri; terrischavio; terrischiavo; terrisfight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 ... 1,101-1,110 next last
To: BigSkyFreeper
(b) The claim or cause of action referred to in subsection (a) is one in which the State court authorizes or directs the withholding or withdrawal of food or fluids or medical treatment necessary to sustain the incapacitated person's life, but does not include a claim or cause of action in which no party disputes, and the court finds, that the incapacitated person, while having capacity, had executed a written advance directive valid under applicable law that clearly authorized the withholding or withdrawal of food or fluids or medical treatment in the applicable circumstances. Do I understand this correctly? Common law and many state statues say the surviving spouse has the right to end of life calls.
The Federal government is saying that a written directive is now required for my end of life decisions and a VERBAL directive can be challenged? Listen up congress. I don't need your stinkin' paper to die with dignity.
701
posted on
03/20/2005 4:51:39 PM PST
by
Drango
(All my ideas, good or bad, are stolen from other FReepers)
To: Peach
You've obviously done a lot of research, with some interesting points. But you still haven't addressed something that troubles many of us. Why Michael -- who has two illegitimate kids, and their status can be regularized only if Terri's out of the picture - - should be given say over her fate, when he has this massive conflict of interest? It's not fair to his kids for him to remain married to Terri, and thereby keep the kids in illegitimate status. And it's not fair to Terri or her family, for him to try to hang on to her, and dictate her fate, when he has a different "wife" and different family that is the focus of his life.
Terri is the focus of her own family's life. Michael has a different family that he focuses on. Indeed, I read on FR that the Schindlers first found out about Michael's out-of-wedlock "wife" and "family" when they read the obituary of Michael's mother: From what I read, it said her survivors included son Michael "and his fiance" -- that's sick, at least for a guy who claims, for court purposes, that he places a priority on his real wife.
One thing this case has done is underscore the importance of traditional family values for the GOP coalition. I'm glad DeLay and Frist stepped forward (wish they'd done it sooner). I'm glad President Bush - a pro-life champmion to the core - is taking Terri's and her family's side in this case. And i'm not impressed with Michael's demonizing of Bush and DeLay.
To: windchime
"Actually, I would have objected to his sole guardianship in the beginning. Joint guardianship...at most."
... and I suppose if your were the husband instead you would say " Sure, fine, we'll just have a committee meeting to figure out what to do with her... "
703
posted on
03/20/2005 4:52:23 PM PST
by
RS
(Keeping them honest since 1998)
To: AmishDude
"I just say he's in a circumstance that his testimony cannot be held up on its own."
Maybe Gov Bush should appoint you to oversee Terri's case instead of Greer...
To: RS
Or perhaps me?
I told you this was going to be bad.
705
posted on
03/20/2005 4:52:48 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: rwfromkansas
I'm still waiting for evidence of financial gain on Michael's part.
To: marajade
It could possibly cause her to choke to death.
------and that would be a problem because.....?
707
posted on
03/20/2005 4:53:29 PM PST
by
maica
(Ask a Dem: "When did promoting Democracy and Freedom in the World become a Bad Thing??")
To: Cboldt
Obviously the law in Florida is that food is not a given. Wonder how much they spend on food stamps and food pantries for the poor? Probably should shut them down since going hungry is no big deal.
To: marajade
Okay. What's your point? That SCOTUS refusal to issue a ruling is not determinative of the veracity or sufficinecy of Michaels Schiavo's testimony.
709
posted on
03/20/2005 4:53:54 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: FairOpinion
From the Chicago Sun Times:
Medical records from the hospital where Schiavo was treated after her collapse say that ''she apparently has been trying to keep her weight down with dieting by herself, drinking liquids most of the time during the day and drinking about 10-15 glasses of iced tea
To: AmishDude
To hell with science, we took a VOTE. Well, that's the way it works in this country; or maybe you live in another country with jackboots who decide stuff like that.
And, btw, the jury decided the case on SCIENCE.
711
posted on
03/20/2005 4:54:00 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Cboldt
That maybe technically true.
To: marajade
Maybe Gov Bush should appoint you to oversee Terri's case instead of Greer...Have you ever heard my theory on Plato's Republic, philosopher kings and Lebesgue integration? It's fascinating stuff!
713
posted on
03/20/2005 4:55:09 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
To: freedomdefender
Indeed, I read on FR that the Schindlers first found out about Michael's out-of-wedlock "wife" and "family" when they read the obituary of Michael's mother: Gee, I wonder if the fact that by that time the Schindlers and Michael had not spoken to each other in years had anything to do with it?
To: FairOpinion
THAT is NOT accurate either -- more disinformation.Are you saying the jury in the malpractice case was wrong?
715
posted on
03/20/2005 4:55:41 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
So that is a LEGAL RULING that bulimia in fact caused her cardiac arrest. And OJ's Jury sent a LEGAL RULING that OJ did not cause the death of his ex-wife and the restaurant waiter.
To: Peach
Michael went back to school and became a respiratory therapist after Terri became PVS----
I wonder if the Schindlers were supporting him when he went back to school? Was this also when he was living with them?
717
posted on
03/20/2005 4:56:20 PM PST
by
maica
(Ask a Dem: "When did promoting Democracy and Freedom in the World become a Bad Thing??")
To: Howlin
They could have ruled that it was inconclusive.
718
posted on
03/20/2005 4:56:40 PM PST
by
AmishDude
(The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
To: Drango
You're so right. Tom Delay said so.
719
posted on
03/20/2005 4:58:06 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: american colleen; Howlin
And OJ's Jury sent a LEGAL RULING that OJ did not cause the death of his ex-wife and the restaurant waiter.Right. Regardless of what you, I or Howlin think.
720
posted on
03/20/2005 4:58:11 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 ... 1,101-1,110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson