Posted on 03/20/2005 12:29:52 PM PST by kcvl
Per Fox News...
Why do you care whether she's videotaped? If she's a vegetable, won't matter to her.
Terri's father was just shown on Fox News being lead away. He said they were being denied visitation and he didn't know why.
Good question
He's been hiding her from the public for YEARS
You can always point to the people who don't have any children on these threads. How does it feel to lose?
- From Absractappeal.com
The Schindlers have nothing to do with that.
Exactly.
Trying to sneak in the camcorder, so of course they were "denied"
(anecdote)--I beheld one probate judge with what another poster called "black robe fever". It was in Texas where a girl over thirteen was trying to exercise her statutory right to state her preference of living with either her mother or dad in a divorce case. She attempted to speak, but the judge told her to shut up or he'd turn her over to a foster home. She had no recourse. It's not something you forget easily--being in the grip of a Bad Judge. It took over a year, but finally they managed to get another judge.
Why doesn't Michael let himself and Terri off the hook? Give in to the heartfelt wishes of the parents to be allowed to try to help her? (I'm not going to assert that she will improve, just that there is hope.)
I once listened to a woman in an interview who was considering getting a late term abortion. She was asked, "You've gone this far. Why not have the baby and make some infertile couple happy in adoption?" Her reply really knocked me between the eyes. "You, I want this to end. I want closure. I don't want, twenty years from now, to know that there's a child of mine out there."
Michael is like the Princess and the Pea--he wants to get rid of that lump in his mattress.
NO I WOULDN'T.
WHY would you make such a statement like that to me?
You know nothing about me.
"Please stop with the troll alert stuff
It doesn't help
Just because someone disagree with us .. it doesn't make them a troll"
agreed! the whole "troll alert" crap is becoming about as
annoying as "This is fx news alert".... People do have the right to disagree for crying out loud...
Personally, I totally disagree with "Deejay" but why would that make him a troll... give it a rest...
I've never alleged anything like that. My concern is that her blood family wants to take her home and care for her - including the mother who gave her birth. Why shouldn't they be allowed to? Her husband has a new wife - a common law wife - and two kids by her. His claim to have Terri's interest at heart is severely compromised by the fact his two kids can't take his name - they're illegitimate - as long as he remains married to Terri and Terri remains alive. The family haven't "moved on with their life" -- Terri is still their blood relative and they haven't replaced her, as it were, with another. But Michael has. As Larry King asked - and Ann Coulter seconded - why can't Michael just move on with his life and let her go? Let her mother take care of her, as she is begging to do?
Grasping at straws.
I could be a man too. But it ain't so. LOL
This is the extent of her injuries:
Remember that women with eating disorders can lose 30% of their bone mass in a year. (Her medical chart also shows her to be undernourished and low in calcium.)
And the only broken bones she had, according to the full deposition of the radiologist was:
- a compression/hairline fracture in lumbar 1, which he said could have happened when she fell (my mother pretty regularly walks around with a hairline fracture in her foot)
- some of her ribs and the parts of the thoracic vertebra they were connected to in the back, which is extremely common after CPR, even in people with strong bones.
That's it.
The rest are just bruises (like her femur), and common joint problems among people in her condition and rehab. The Drs who saw her treated her for those things.
There would also have been outward signs like bruising had she been attacked, and it would no way explain such "severely" low potassium.
No; it's stupid to say that he is living with someone else yet is still a "husband". Why is he in her life? For the death money? Why cremate her immediately? So there's no autopsy to show her abuse? He has moved on to another woman, and in MS's words "When is the b!tch going to die"...
I have adult kids AND GRANDKIDS!!! you twit!
IF she said it....it should have been made into a legal document IF she said it and was serious about it. This is purely HEARSAY!!!!!!!!!!
He didn't say he suddenly remembered. Why didn't he say that IN THE FIRST PLACE?! Maybe because he wanted the MONEY from the lawsuit FIRST? Then when he "moved on" with his life he didn't want to be bothered with Terri any longer?
Why has Terri NEVER been represented by her own attorney? Wouldn't a CONVICTED KILLER have their own attorney? Why not Terri, someone not connected to either side of the argument?
What I posted was that Judge Geer denied the request for an investigation
Is that part true or not
I have two kids, and have lost one. What is your point?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.