Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Lunatic of the Day (3/19/2005)
Liberal Lunacy ^ | 3/19/2005 | Beckwith

Posted on 03/19/2005 11:18:14 AM PST by Beckwith

Edited on 03/19/2005 11:20:08 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Patti Davis, Ronald Reagan’s renegade daughter, has an article in the current Newsweek titled “Dirty Footprints” in which she pleads, “We must write letters of outrage to the senators who voted to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). But maybe all there is left to do is weep. When I saw the news today, I sat down and wept.”

Davis continues with, “President Bush must be feeling so victorious. The Senate has now said ‘yes’ to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge—the pristine place President Eisenhower took measures to protect in 1960.”

She laments, “Environmental groups have said the fight isn’t over, and I want to believe there is still something we can do—write letters, e-mails, rise up en masse and say no. But I don’t know if anything will help at this point. It’s possible that the only thing we will be able to do is weep—at the devastation of wild, untamed land where caribou are free to breed and give birth far away from the harm that humans bring. Where polar bear are a common sight and where cars and trucks and engines are never heard. Where people are outnumbered by the vast numbers of birds and animals—safe for the moment, but soon to be doomed.”

“The absurd statements made by politicians and oil companies that the environment can be protected while drilling for oil are just that—absurd. It assumes that we are ignorant. Roads will be carved, trucks will rumble through, drills will be stabbed into the earth. Oil companies don’t care about nature, the environment or the animals that will be terrified and traumatized. They don’t care, and neither does the Bush administration. We will be left with the damage this administration has caused, with scars on the earth and memories of wildlife that used to roam and fly over vast acres … before they started dying.”

Davis’ conclusion is that, “We have an administration in Washington that cares nothing for this planet, for beauty, for pristine places, for innocent animals with soft brown eyes. Everything is a war to this president, and he is determined to win.”

Link: Dirty Footprints


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: alaska; anwr; oil; wildliferefuge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Patti Davis was born while Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and labor leader. That’s the only rationale I can attribute to this article. Beyond that, this is a classic liberal approach to solving a problem. Let your feelings determine the best path. Facts are irrelevant. Emotion is everything.

Davis does not include a single fact in her overly-emotional description of the future of ANWR except to forecast doom and the death of all life at the hands of the evil Bush, “who cares nothing for this planet.”

I really have only one question about this article, and that is, how often does Newsweek conduct writing contests for liberal dilettantes?
1 posted on 03/19/2005 11:18:14 AM PST by Beckwith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Does she have a job?


2 posted on 03/19/2005 11:24:38 AM PST by Shisan (Jalisco no te rajes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Funny how the best of the Reagan kids was adopted. Perhaps that made him appreciate his Dad all the more.


3 posted on 03/19/2005 11:31:17 AM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

I don't mind if the rich Hollywood elite prevent us from drilling at ANWR--as long as they pick up my gas bill.


4 posted on 03/19/2005 11:31:39 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Why the* do 'environmental groups' get to decide policy for the majority of the nation?

It's time to start writing laws for the majority and considerations for the exceptions again instead of making laws for the exceptions and making considerations for the majority.

5 posted on 03/19/2005 11:31:49 AM PST by infidel29 ("It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world."- T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Allowing the arabs to reap the rewards of high priced oil sales is sheer stupidity.

We should be drilling in every backyard and building 100 new nuclear power plants.

Add 20 new refineries and we're off to a good start.

We need oil and the 100s of thousands of new jobs created would be an added benefit.

Let the greenies try to run their automobiles with wood-fired engines.

Oh no!

Air pollution

6 posted on 03/19/2005 11:31:55 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (NO PRISONERS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

I don't quite think polar bears wander ANWAR. They spend most of the year on the Arctic Ice, and (MAYBE) a few months on the coast in summer when the ice breaks up,and when females come out of their den.I presume Patti, having hiked to northern Alaska from home on foot, noticed the ursine abundance while gamboling about the preserve. Ms. Davis no doubt wrote this crie de couer on a manual typewriter using vellum hand processed from animal hide, and hand delivered it by bicycle to he publisher, who had a stable of unemployed monks make copies using quill pens and candlelight.


7 posted on 03/19/2005 11:36:09 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Of the surviving children of President Reagan it is sad that the only one who understands the greatness and legacy of the man is Michael,who was adopted.
People are free to come to whatever political views they wish but they should still respect the memory of one of our greatest Presidents and finest Americans that ever lived who happened to be their father.
Without that fact,no one would care any more what Ron Jr.or Patti would have to say than they would the rest of us.
8 posted on 03/19/2005 11:37:56 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

They weep for the caribou but shed not one tear for Terry Schivo.


9 posted on 03/19/2005 11:39:40 AM PST by speed_addiction (Ninja's last words, "Hey guys. Watch me just flip out on that big dude over there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

THey're you go with those damned facts again.

You need to understand the liberal mind. With them it's all emotion. It's how I feel, not what I know.

I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut this woman has ever been near ANWR and has no idea what the real impact of drilling would be.

It's how she feels that's important.


10 posted on 03/19/2005 11:40:15 AM PST by Beckwith (I knew Churchill, and Ward Churchill is no Churchill . . . he ain't no Indian either . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Roads will be carved, trucks will rumble through, drills will be stabbed into the earth. Oil companies don’t care about nature, the environment or the animals that will be terrified and traumatized.

Oh for heaven's sake. I've been to many wildlife refuges and national parks, and they've all had roads going through them. The Point Barrow drilling has not appreciably damaged the environment. And while the environment is important, it is one of many factors to consider, including economic growth and reduction of dependence on oil controlled by enemy or untrustworthy Middle Eastern (or South American) countries.

11 posted on 03/19/2005 11:40:16 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Top Ten Reasons to Develop ANWR:

http://www.anwr.org/topten.htm

And Number Eleven? To see uninformed, ignorant, touchy-feely liberals cry. Tee-Hee! :)

I'd better not hear that Patti Davis uses fossil fuels in any way, shape or form or I'm gonna be REALLY disappointed in her. /sarcasm

"The past is like the rudder of a ship. It keeps you moving through the present, steers you into the future." - Patti Davis

Man. What a deep thinker that woman is! *Rolleyes*


12 posted on 03/19/2005 11:44:13 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam

Pristine? It's one of the most God forsaken places on earth. God knew what He was doing putting it there where there was virtually nothing to destroy. Liberals are idiots.


13 posted on 03/19/2005 11:45:25 AM PST by holyscroller (A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but the foolish man's heart directs him to the left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
You have to be wrong in your Post, Patti has said that in every oil field in the nation nothing is left alive. Not a bird or beast , Nothing but roadways through desolation, and the pumps that bring up the black gold. If I was a Caribou I know I wouldnt have sex in an oilfield. <<<>>>
14 posted on 03/19/2005 11:47:33 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Boo-hoo-hoo!


15 posted on 03/19/2005 11:47:38 AM PST by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Isn't it nice that Patti cooperated with the old California law?

Along with more precise and specific terminology, the 1913 law also contained references to a "State Lunacy Commission," which was headed by Frederick Winslow Hatch. This commission had existed since 1897, but had not until this time been integrated into a coherent policymaking structure dealing with sterilization. Those suffering from certain mental illnesses could be sterilized on the order of the Lunacy Commission as a condition of release from an institution. In the case of the mentally retarded, or "feeble-minded," who were legally minors, the new law conditioned surgery upon the written consent of parents or guardians.

http://www.gottshall.com/thesis/article.htm

16 posted on 03/19/2005 11:47:43 AM PST by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
This woman is so clueless. Our Canadian hunting guide took us to the pipeline because that is where the deer and other animals came to graze. The cook in our hunting camp was only able to cook for us that week because her winter job in Alaska hadn't started yet. In winter she cooked for the oil crews farther north because they could only work that area when the ground was frozen. The animals moved south at that time of year. Environmentalist believe what they want to believe.
17 posted on 03/19/2005 11:49:44 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
..drills will be stabbed into the earth.

"Mother Earth" is a living, feeling, higher-power to these idiot liberal democrat ecoterrorist wicca witches!

18 posted on 03/19/2005 11:54:52 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

From what I hear, the polar bears and caribou love hanging out around the pipelines. Maybe the animals are actually blue-state urban types who *like* living within earshot of the machinery of commerce -- the engines and the buildings and the pipelines. This is the case for most human liberals; that's why they crowd together in the bustling cities. Why should the animals be deprived of the environment that liberals prefer and seek out for themselves?


19 posted on 03/19/2005 11:58:43 AM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
I read a story a while ago that I will try and post, some scientist had proposed a plan to dump toxic waste on the moon to keep it safe. A bunch of loons started a petition to the U.N. to protect the "pristine" surface of the moon from exploitation. They weren't that upset about the risks of getting it up there, just the fact that we would be messing up the moons surface. They were trying to get a couple of nations to propose a mandate not to allow any human use of the "Last unmarred area left that humans haven't destroyed." I can't believe these idiots and what they will feel up next.
20 posted on 03/19/2005 11:59:01 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for not reading the whole article since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson