Posted on 03/19/2005 4:02:25 AM PST by Pipeline
Muslims demand papal apology for crusades Highest Sunni authority sends official request to Vatican
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: March 19, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
The world's highest Sunni Muslim authority has demanded an official apology from the pope for the medieval Christian crusades.
Sheikh Fawzi Zafzaf, president of the Interfaith Dialogue Committee of Al-Azhar University in Cairo, said his panel sent the request to the Vatican in February, the Morocco Times reported.
The demand arose from Pope John Paul II's apologies to the Jewish people and his visits to Syria and Egypt a few years ago, Zafzaf said.
Al-Azhar is only asking for a similar treatment, he stated.
The Morocco paper said the Vatican's ambassador to Egypt has declined to comment, saying Al-Azhar's request is being considered by the Holy See.
While many Christians have expressed remorse for the crusades, some scholars insist the common characterization of zealous imperialists attacking peaceful Muslims is wrong.
Thomas F. Madden, author of "A Concise History of the Crusades," contends the Crusades "were in every way a defensive war."
"They were the West's belated response to the Muslim conquest of fully two-thirds of the Christian world," he wrote in a National Review column. "While the Arabs were busy in the seventh through the tenth centuries winning an opulent and sophisticated empire, Europe was defending itself against outside invaders and then digging out from the mess they left behind. Only in the eleventh century were Europeans able to take much notice of the East. "
Madden said the event that led to the crusades was the Turkish conquest of most of Christian Asia Minor, modern Turkey.
"The Christian emperor in Constantinople, faced with the loss of half of his empire, appealed for help to the rude but energetic Europeans. He got it. More than he wanted, in fact," wrote Madden, associate professor and chair of the Department of History at Saint Louis University.
Over the past several years, pronouncements from Al-Azhar have sparked controversy.
In 2003, Al-Azhar's grand sheikh, Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, stated suicide bombers are considered "martyrs" under Islamic law.
In December 2002, the Islamic Ruling Committee in Al-Azhar declared the acquisition of nuclear weapons to be a religious obligation for Islamic states.
A member of panel, Sheikh Ala A-Shanawi, said, "The Islamic nation has to recognize the enemy, and to prepare itself accordingly."
Answering a question he received, A-Shanawi wrote, "Allah's messenger [Muhammad] would have prepared himself with all the resources possible in order to deal with the enemy. Therefore, if the Islamic nation is not equipped with the desired weaponry needed, it will be forced to suffer the consequences, and will be blamed for negligence."
The sheikh continued, "All Islamic nations are required to seize nuclear weaponry, giving the nation the utmost respect. We see how far behind our nation is as a result of not being prepared as well as it should be, while the enemy has equipped itself with the best weaponry there is, which it will use to harm and destroy Muslims."
And the crusader Saint John the Baptist in downtown Beirut.
The Crusaders had it right.
Israeli Olympic athletes, Leon Klinghoffer's family, Naval personnel on the USS Cole, thousands of family members left behind, bereft in the wake of 9/11 and countless others before and since, shout with one voice -
SCREW YOU and THE CAMELS YOU RIDE!
We might apologise after every single vestige of your foul pseudo-religion is wiped out from this earth - but why don't you just hold your breath until then?!
A.A.C.
"While many Christians have expressed remorse for the crusades..."
We have no remorse, we are still living here in the Middle East, still hanging on to our faith after eight centuries.
The Patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church (Antiochan) declared publicly in 1985 that this land is a christian land and whoever lives on it is our guest.
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
My only remorse over the Crusades is their insufficient thoroughness.
Agreed!
How about a Muslim apology for 911?
Try askin' the next one - he'll probably be one of you anyway...
why stop with that ? return the temple mount to its rightful owners and rid it of those 2 abominations and return all the holy sites to the Hindus that were turned into mosques
This guy has very Western thinking...
How about an apology for the CURRENT Muslem crusade first? What? NO? Rot in hell you murderer.
Jerusalem is eternally Jewish
We live in interesting times.
And when they are at it.... WHY NOT MONETARY COMPENSATION ??
Oh yes!
Sooner or later, civilized society is going to have to deal with Islam. It is a violent cult and pseudo-religion. Muslims cannot be trusted. They have proven that beyond a shadow of a doubt. We should strive to elect leaders who will deal with these people as any threat should be dealt with.
Not this Christian, neither. No apologies forthcoming.
Eat s#*t and die you sons of pig F*$king dogs! The crusades, although sadly bungled by greedy noblemen at the time were a response to the muslim invasions and conquest of what were then predominately christian lands. Their policy of convert or die and closing off of the holy land, desecration of christian sites were the impetus for mounting armies against their worthless asses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.