Michael Marcavage
Posted on 03/17/2005 6:49:58 AM PST by scripter
Michael Marcavage |
A Christian student who sued his college for trying to commit him to a mental hospital over his objections to a play depicting Jesus Christ as a homosexual has lost his battle in a Philadelphia courtroom.
A jury ruled yesterday in favor of Temple University in connection with the complaint filed by Michael Marcavage, who now heads Repent America and who recently made headlines after being arrested and later cleared for preaching against homosexuality at a public event.
The finding is being blasted by the American Family Association Center for Law & Policy, which handled the case.
"The judge incorrectly instructed the jury on Pennsylvania law and left the jury with little choice but to find as it did for Temple University and its officials, and we were prohibited from introducing our most compelling evidence," said the group's chief counsel, Stephen Crampton. "The judge seemed to exclude evidence that was favorable to Marcavage and include any evidence that was favorable to Temple University and its officials. So the jury heard a completely distorted view of what actually happened."
Crampton said he's confident the verdict will be reversed on appeal.
According to Brian Fahling, another attorney with the AFA Law Center, Marcavage was detained after he "initiated a Christian response" to the university theater department's decision to stage "Corpus Christi," a play that made its debut on Broadway in 1998 and depicts Jesus as a homosexual who has sex with his disciples.
In the play, Jesus was eventually crucified for being "king of the queers." When it broke on Broadway, the play received national criticism.
 Marcavage arrested last year in Philadelphia while preaching against homosexuality (courtesy: Repent America) |
Marcavage, a former White House West Wing intern, immediately complained about the play to the dean of the School of Communications and Theater, as well as the president of the university when theater officials announced it in the fall of 1999.
Besides informing those officials of the play's content, Fahling said Marcavage – in a prepared statement – admitted posting fliers all over the university "so that all Christians on campus would be aware of this horrible play," and made plans to stage a protest outside the theater when the play opened.
In the days that followed, Marcavage said he had a number of meetings with William Bergman, vice president of campus safety, and Carl Bittenbender, director of campus safety. Though he had initially planned to protest, Bergman and Bittenbender eventually convinced Marcavage that protests might lead to confrontations between rival student factions. Marcavage then agreed to cancel his protest.
Instead, he asked officials for permission to stage a Christian outreach to students; Fahling said the university security officials gave him permission for that.
Marcavage, in his statement to Fahling, said Bergman promised him a stage would be provided to help him with his outreach program, but later the same day, Bittenbender allegedly called Marcavage to tell him that the stage "might be out of the question." The campus safety director then asked the student to meet with him and Bergman the next morning at the vice president's office.
At that meeting, Marcavage said Bergman told him a stage would be too expensive to provide and therefore, one would not be set up for the outreach program. Marcavage said he then offered to pay for the stage himself, but was again told no – without further explanation.
Exasperated, Marcavage said he then "excused himself, went to the bathroom, locked the door and prayed about what he should do next," AFA officials said.
According to the student, Bergman followed him to the bathroom and began pounding on the door, demanding that he open it and resume the discussion about the stage. Marcavage said he opened the door and "told him that I believed our conversation was over."
Next, according to Marcavage, Bergman "physically" forced him back into the vice president's office and "pushed me into a chair and held me with his arm." Fahling said Marcavage asked to leave but Bergman "allegedly refused to allow it."
"Attempting to rise, [Marcavage] said the vice president tripped him to the floor," then was "manhandled" to a nearby couch by both men "where they held him down."
Within moments, Marcavage said, a Temple University police officer arrived and handcuffed him. Then, "Marcavage was taken by police ... to the Emergency Crisis Center at Temple University Hospital," AFA officials told WorldNetDaily.
According to Fahling, under Pennsylvania law, a person that is involuntarily committed for a psychological evaluation "has to be a clear threat to himself or a clear threat to others," though he and Marcavage deny that the student "in any way" fits the criteria.
Fahling said on-site interviews at the university with fellow students who personally know Marcavage – including one who is a registered nurse and saw him that morning before his meeting with officials – "indicated that he is not the kind of person" who would engage in behavior requiring a mandatory mental examination.
Yet, at the crisis center, Bittenbender allegedly signed a statement describing Marcavage as "severely mentally disabled"; that he represented a "clear and present danger to others"; that he had "inflicted or attempted to inflict serious bodily harm on another" within the past month; and that he "has attempted suicide" – all of which constituted a "reasonable probability of suicide unless treatment was afforded" him.
Fahling said Bittenbender concluded his statement by asserting that Marcavage was "in need of involuntary examination and treatment."
"When I was first told about this case, I found it hard to believe," Fahling told WorldNetDaily. "I thought it was something out of the 'Twilight Zone.'"
He said that Marcavage was not found to be mentally distressed or exhibiting any behavior that matched the admission statement given by Bittenbender. "He was released three hours later – and that was largely because it took [hospital staff] a while to get to him."
Fahling said Dr. Jose Villaluz of the clinic staff did examine Marcavage "because, per state law, they are required to. But he didn't find anything wrong with him."
The AFA attorney said documents provided by Marcavage show that Villaluz noted in his evaluation report that the student was "not in need of involuntary treatment."
Fahling added that when Marcavage was being led out of Bergman's office by police, a university staff psychologist – Dr. Denise Walton – was on hand and commented that she couldn't understand why the student was being involuntarily detained.
In a separate statement, Fahling said Walton wrote that she had seen "no overt sign that [Marcavage] was about to harm himself or others."
"This is a young man of some substance," Fahling said. "I believe his story is genuine. This kid is solid as a rock."
Ping.
And he should make quite a bit of money in the lawsuit.
But he's got to find a different judge.
"And he should make quite a bit of money in the lawsuit. "
This just BEGS for RICO and Civil Rights litigation, just got to find a genuine AMERICAN judge!
I would certainly think so. I find this an incredible story...
I just found this:
Notation: Petrese Tucker, the federal judge who presided over the trial, received both her bachelor's and law degrees from Temple University, was employed as an adjunct professor, and had received awards from the university while the litigation was pending. She refused to recuse herself and clearly affected the outcome of the trial by withholding key evidence from the jury.
Judge rules against Christians who preached to Homosexuals:
Judge Petrese B. Tucker, for the second time, has refused to sanction the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office for what the Christians' attorneys say are "retaliatory criminal proceedings."
"he represented a "clear and present danger to others"; that he had "inflicted or attempted to inflict serious bodily harm on another"
This sounds more like John Chaney.
keep an eye on the news
If the world was just and fair and wisdom and common sense prevailed. But that is a very big IF. I have grown cynical- grown why I have become a giant of cynicism when it comes to our judicial system. Judges for some reason are given so much leeway in which evidence is allowed to proceed through trial. This is inexecusable and if at one time its purpose was quite sensible needs to be revisited and tailored to prevent judicial despots from skewering verdicts.
I find it amazing, that just 35 years ago, homosexuality was still considered a mental disorder by the "psychiatric" profession.
Now the kid who is affirming his 1st Amendment Right to speak out against it, especially in the name of Jesus is being persecuted by the State.
Something smells diabolical here.
What the heck????? Whe is an EMPLOYEE of a party in the case and didn't recuse herself? I believe that that alone is grounds for an overturning of the ruling. This should also be filed as a complaint to the BAR association and to any and all ethics panels that could have jurisdiction.
Federal judge? I wonder who appointed her.
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
|
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
Homosexual Agenda Ping PLUS Moral Absolutes Ping.
More in detail on the leader of the group of Chrisitans who were arrested at the Philadelphia "OutFest" and finally had their charges dropped.
This is another case - and if, as Scripter says, this is an accurate description of what happened, is quite terrible. I've read another couple of articles about it, and they are all in agreement. Reminds one of the Soviet Union when religious believers were considered insane and sent to mental institutions.
I'm really starting to think in terms of civil disobedience. Plays or other "expression" based on vile blasphemy should not be legal. I know many will disagree, but after due consideration, it is the right thing to do. And the Founding Fathers would agree.
Let DirtyHarryY2K and me know if you want on/off the Homosexual Agenda Pinglist, and let ME know if you want (back)on/off the Moral Absolutes pinglist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.