Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon delegation arrives in Taipei for talks with military
Taipei Times ^ | Mar 17, 2005 | Rich Chang

Posted on 03/16/2005 8:34:58 PM PST by Lokibob

 

 

 

Pentagon delegation arrives in Taipei for talks with militaryBy Rich Chang
STAFF REPORTER
Thursday, Mar 17, 2005,Page 1

A US military delegation arrived in Taipei yesterday, and will discuss the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) capabilities with Taiwanese military officials.

A member of the delegation, who requested anonymity, told the Taipei Times that the US saw the possibility of China's launching an attack using asymmetric warfare tactics against Taiwan as increasing.

"The US is concerned as to whether the PLA would be able to start an asymmetric war against Taiwan and whether there exists a fifth column of infiltrators in Taiwan," he said.

He said that the military delegation would also attend a four-day, closed-door unscheduled briefing with the Ministry of National Defense (MND) on the PLA's ability to invade Taiwan.

Meanwhile, National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Hsueh Shih-ming (Á§¥Û¥Á) told the legislature on Monday that, according to NSB statistics, law enforcement officials have documented more than 49,000 Chinese illegal immigrants in Taiwan, and had repatriated more than 45,000 of them. Over 4,000 are missing.

Hsueh said that, while the NSB found that some of them are spying for China in Taiwan, the NSB has yet to uncover any organized activity among Chinese immigrants.

Hsueh, however, admitted that the NSB is concerned that China might use infiltrators to engage in asymmetric warfare against Taiwan, employing such tactics as sabotage and hacker attacks, or using biological and chemical weapons to destroy Taiwan's military infrastructure, command systems, and political and business centers in a short time.

"The goal of such tactics is to devastate the morale of our armed forces and citizens. This threat is strikingly similar to terrorism in nature," he added.

The US delegation member said that in addition to discussing Chinese infiltrators, the delegation would also exchange its views with Taipei on China's increasingly aggressive submarine force.

He said the US is concerned about incursions by Chinese submarines into the waters surrounding Japan and the Pacific Ocean east of Taiwan.

"A Chinese nuclear submarine made an incursion into waters near Okinawa last November, which really angered and affected Japan," he said.

The US is also concerned about China's acquisition of advanced Kilo-class attack submarines from Russia, he said.

He added that the US is seeking to share intelligence with Taiwan about anti-submarine warfare.

He said several delegations of US military personal would be arriving in Taipei in succession to observe the annual Han Kuang (Han Glory) exercises.

In related news, a Chinese newspaper yesterday said that the former commander of US Pacific Command, Admiral Thomas Fargo, will lead the US' biggest-ever delegation to watch this year's war games, which begin next month.

Japan will also send military personnel to Taipei, the paper said.

The report said the nation's military is preparing to conduct joint computer war games with the US and Japan, and the military will link up with the US military's Pacific headquarters in Hawaii for the first time.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; dod; military; taiwan; talks; wargames
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
You wrote: "Let's push them until they back down when it comes to Taiwan or attack while they are less prepared then they will be in the future."

And if they don't back down? If they carry through with an attack? Think about it. A war with China would not be confined to repulsing an invasion of Taiwan. It would be a global, not localized affair. Millions of casualties. Millions. A holocaust even without nuclear weapons--which, by the way, would almost certainly be employed because we don't have the conventional resources to undertake an invasion of the mainland. Further, a statement by the President declaring outright our intentions to defend Taiwan would throw the issue into the international arena, with the Chinese claiming intervention in their sovereignty, along with the resultant loss of international support because the President would show himself--at least in the eyes of marginal allies--as an utter dunderhead in diplomacy, ultimately heightening tensions to the breaking point with no real advantage gained.

One war at a time, thanks.
21 posted on 03/16/2005 10:12:26 PM PST by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Guht

I don't know. Even though we aren't as productive as we used to be, if we did have to go to war with China, and a lot of our resources were shifted to that war, things like the aid we give to other countries, the food we sell worldwide (we are still the largest supplier of food to the world, right?), and the sheer force of America gearing up for a new BIG war will make the rest of the world think "now do we want this to go on for a long time by sitting out, not getting anything from America, or should we jump in and get this over with ASAP?" I for one still have faith that America will be helped out, maybe just to get the world back to status quo.


22 posted on 03/16/2005 10:14:08 PM PST by Laz711 (Fear is the Mind Killer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior

But can we really afford a larger military right now? Will the markets allow for more spending. The problem now is the lack of revenue streams for government to function on. I don't see how a larger military can be achieved without raising taxes which simply put Washington is not willing to do. We can talk all day long about how great it would be if we could realize a libertarian/conservative government whose main concern was national defense, but I don't see that happening ever. People like their Medicare/Medicaid, and they like Social Security (I don't want this discussion to devolve into a discussion of Social Security it has been done in other forums).

Personally, I don't think that raising taxes for the expressed purpose of investing in the military is a bad thing. The money should translate to jobs in the private sector. That however does not solve the problem of people or more precisely lack therof. I do not see anyway around a draft on this one.

To the comment that 600 billion isn't all that much in treasuries. I completely disagree especially if it is taken in conjunction with a complete nationalization of all factories in the PRC. If you personally have enough liquidity to purchase them I congratulate you, however, from what I've seen of the most recent set of economic data, most Americans simply put do not have the savings to prop up our debt in that manner. If you follow the economic/business news then you are no doubt aware that even Warren Buffet is moving away from the dollar and into European markets, and the saying is where the Wizard goes Wall Street follows.

Free trade has been an unmitigated disaster for most Americans, and the national security angle of relocating our manufacturing capacity in China has not been covered in the MSM (am I surprised of course not).


23 posted on 03/16/2005 10:20:04 PM PST by Guht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Guht
What worries me the most is that if China does decide to move decisively against the ROC then they will also know that we will in some way retaliate. Simple causality. However, the question then becomes what happens if they decide to unload around 600 billion in US Treasuries? It could theoretically bring our country to an economic standstill by completely devaluing our currency.

Our economy is the least of our worries when dealing with China.

24 posted on 03/17/2005 2:44:36 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Guht
Let me put it this way, I am afraid of the corner we have put ourselves into

The most dangerous type of animal is a cornered one.

25 posted on 03/17/2005 2:52:30 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

We need to at least treat the ChiComs like Ronald Reagan treated the Societ Union. The threat of overwhelming force to keep the peace and if the ChiComs make a move. Well we would have that overwheliming force to crush them like an egg.


26 posted on 03/17/2005 2:54:10 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

Some of you are correct in some aspects, Europe would not get involved unless it was an all out-war, which I'm sure we all pray will never again happen.

A recent column was posted on a blog site called AtlasWide and it gave an interesting analysis of the snowballing China-Taiwan situation and how the world MIGHT line up.

It looks something like this.

Australia, the U.S., Japan and Taiwan are literally locked together by not only past agreements but more recent ones as well. We have recently "put muscle" into our relations with Japan after a 6 point talk with ambassadors of both parties (March 14).

Russia is essentially locked in with China now. Like this posting said (but it's not the first time it's been said), Russia either chooses the possibility of a future power with China, provided they can assume the position economically, loosing everything with the U.S. and our closer allies, OR they stay neutral. Well the latter is impossible, 3 months ago they dug themselves a hole with BRICs and have been taken up with China ever since. They promised to perform joint military maneuvers last year. Russia would never get involved in a conflict if it had no special interest for them. Their possible power with China MUST outweigh the cost of a war with the United States or else they wouldn't even attempt it; they are betting on a win.

North Korea might have to get involved if China asks for it, so don't count that out. In the case that NK does put a foot in, things will escalate back home with fear of a nuclear strike.

This isn't all of it but you can read the rest at atlaswide.blogspot.com


27 posted on 03/17/2005 8:53:51 AM PST by Semper_Volo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

Allowing the invasion of Taiwan by the PRC is unacceptable. After Taiwan, they will move outward to the other islands and territories that they claim. Even if we decided not to act, millions would die.


28 posted on 03/17/2005 8:57:25 AM PST by dmartin (Who Dares Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
I tend to agree. Much better to "negotiate" from a position of strength - and we are stronger from a technological standpoint, but are woefully under powered in troop numbers. As you stated, we had to draw troops (including reserves and National Guard) just for our two "relatively small" fights in Afghanistan and Iraq. I'm not necessarily saying we need an army big enough to fight a real world war standing at all times - but we sure seem undermanned even with the current level of deployment.
29 posted on 03/17/2005 8:58:13 AM PST by TheBattman (Islam (and liberals)- the cult of Satan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

To bad I am told old to join the military.


30 posted on 03/17/2005 8:59:15 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Contrast this with.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1364721/posts?page=20

Hate to say it, but I am beginning to think the war on terror is just the pregame scrimmage. If we get in a shooting match with China..
31 posted on 03/17/2005 9:59:58 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
To bad I am told old to join the military.

When we get into a fight with the PRC you will A. Be working in a defense industry B. Be a member of the military in some sort of capacity. C. Be dead. We don't have the population for a war like WWII to be fought with young men. It will be an all or nothing draft.

32 posted on 03/17/2005 10:07:42 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Guht
They can't unload 600 billion in US Treasuries, because they would collapse the market for those bonds and China would take huge financial losses on their sale. If they try to sell a fraction of that amount quickly to drive up interest rates and send us into recession, our Federal Reserve bank can always buy the bonds that China is selling and hold down interest rates. That would amount to monetizing some of China's debt, which is inflationary and would weaken the dollar, but our economy would keep going and China's attempt to slow down our economy would fail.

A lot of economic pundits forget that money is just numbers in bankers' computers. If the Fed needs to create money to buy up Chinese bond holdings, they can create all the money they need in seconds and stop any financial panic. This can be inflationary, but the key concept is that it's not so easy to collapse any financial market and generate panic when the US Fed can create money at will to buy into any market and stop a selling panic.

33 posted on 03/17/2005 10:27:15 AM PST by carl in alaska (Blog blog bloggin' on heaven's door.....Teddy's speechs are just one big snore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
I wonder who's side France and Germany and NATO are on?
They wanted a multipolar world, power speaking. Looks like they may get their way, only they won't be one of them.

The roster is starting to look like this to me...

The Good Guys: USA, Japan, Britain, Australia, Taiwan, India(maybe), S. Korea(maybe)

The Bad and Insane Guys: China, N. Korea(insane), Iran(insane), Russia

The Irrelevant: France, Germany, and the rest of NATO including Canada and excluding Britain
34 posted on 03/17/2005 10:43:20 AM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guht

Intel has a plant in China now

If this thing does go real hot, I'd guess its high up on the targeting list.

We won't invade China, we'll bomb them back into the stone age and they know it. They can't win in an exchange of bombs and missiles, and they know it.

35 posted on 03/17/2005 11:06:41 AM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Guht
That could have potentially worked in a world where the world opinion of the US was favorable.

If it comes to it, think the rest of the world would choose a future dominated by China just because they don't like us much? I doubt it. If the sh*t hits the fan, they'll run to us for protection as fast as they can. Unfortunately, they won't be able to help us much.

36 posted on 03/17/2005 11:10:53 AM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
I thought you were going to say that we don't have the population to fight China head to head.
Still, I am willing to fight, or dead, or serve this country in some capacity if I can, if there is a major war with China.
37 posted on 03/17/2005 11:15:07 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Laz711

I for one still have faith that America will be helped out, maybe just to get the world back to status quo.

I think you are right. I think the rest of the world would be terrified of a world dominated by China, which is what would happen if we get into a shooting war with them and do not prevail. If they can take us on and come out on top, they will be free to do what they want in the world. That is the Realpolitiks of the situation.

38 posted on 03/17/2005 11:15:37 AM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dmartin
I never said we should stand by and watch as the Chinese rape Taiwan. I do, however, support a waiting game right now. As I see it, the President is being careful not to give the Chinese a gift-wrapped causus belli to justify an invasion to the international community.

If a war does come, our navy alone--great as it is--cannot defeat the Chinese. For that, we need troops on the ground and planes in the air. It would take time to consolidate and focus our military for trouble in the Taiwan Strait--especially since Chinese planners almost certainly intend to consummate an invasion in a matter of days. The President, I think, is working desperately to wrap up our Iraq involvement as quickly as he can so that we can lower our troop commitment there in order to reallocate those forces where they are more needed. As emotionally and psychologically satisfying as publicly declaring our intention to militarily support Taiwan might be, it would serve no useful strategic purpose.

Finally, as I've asserted earlier, I think the driver behind the whole Taiwan invasion scare of the last several months has been the Chinese military. The Party, I think, would rather play for time until a more amenable American administration comes along. Why fight Bush when you can drink tea with Kerry (or his equivalent)?
39 posted on 03/17/2005 12:25:04 PM PST by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

War with China is unthinkable. WalMart shoppers would rise up in rebellion.


40 posted on 03/17/2005 12:36:20 PM PST by DaoPian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson