Posted on 03/16/2005 9:28:00 AM PST by Vasilli22
A Scholar For Stalin By Rocco DiPippo FrontPageMagazine.com | March 16, 2005
For twenty years, Grover Furr has been an English professor at Montclair State University in Montclair, New Jersey, where he educates students in his peculiar worldview, which is an updated Stalinism and in which America is the worlds biggest oppressor and greatest terrorist state. While his academic expertise is English literature, he presents himself as an expert on communism, and scours academic forums like the Historians of American Communism net, defending Joseph Stalin and calling Americas role in bringing down the Soviet Empire a moral outrage. Was there something morally wrong in trying to bring down the Soviet Union? I think the only honest answer possible is: Yes, it was wrong, says Furr.
In a speech delivered at the First Unitarian Universalist Church of Essex County in New Jersey, Furr said, I think the reason Stalin is vilified is because, in his day at the helm of the Soviet Union, the exploiters all over the world had something to worry about! That's why I feel some kinship with Stalin and the communist movement of his day. And not only his day: What the majority of humanity needs today is an international like that one, to co-ordinate the fight against exploitation -- just as the IMF and the World Bank, Exxon and Reebok, the US and French and the other governments, coordinate the fight FOR exploitation. A copy of the entire speech appears on his website, the same site his students must use as a study resource.
Although not a historian, Furr frequents the Historians of American Communism, a scholarly forum inhabited by experts on Communism like Robert Conquest, John Earl Haynes and Robert W. Cherny. There he takes up causes like denying Stalins well-documented campaign to liquidate the Jews: The mass murder of Jews, but not only of Jews, by the Nazis is very well documented. In the case of the Cold-War horror stories demonizing Stalin, the shoe is on the other foot -- all the evidence points in the opposite direction...Of the hoary horror tales virtually taken for granted as true concerning Stalin, I have researched many at this point in my life, and have yet to find a single one that is true, or anywhere near it." Participants in the forum generally find Furrs positions to be absurd.
At Montclair University, Furr teaches a General Humanities course described on his website as, an introduction to Western European culture and society from the Ancient World through the Middle Ages. Required reading for the course includes the following authors: James Axtell, whose The White Indians of Colonial America implies that Native American culture was better than European culture in colonial America; Ronald Takaki, a prominent multiculturalist whose views of Americas oppression of minorities is only a shade more moderate than Ward Churchills; Rodney Hilton, a British Marxist; G.E.M. de Ste Croix, whose The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World is a Marxist tract; and I.F. Stone, a Communist fellow traveler and then New Leftist who once commended the Soviet Union for steadily expanding democracy in every sphere.
Another of Furrs courses, titled The Great Books and Ideas, offers more radical-left fare. Readings for the course include works by Karl Marx, a Marxist analysis of Shakespeare by Richard Wilson, a book by Communist Party member Ted Allen, one by Marxist feminist Silvia Federici, and one by radical-left activist Marcus Rediker, who has worked to win a new trial for convicted cop killer and leftist icon Mumia Abu-Jamal.
While Furr has no credentials as a history teacher his duties at Monclair include teaching a course on the Vietnam War. Furrs course paints America as an oppressive, terrorist state. His Vietnam war page, and his Politics and Social Issues web page, which are course resources, feature virulently anti-U.S. material, much of it penned by him. Furrs personal views on Vietnam reflect the views of the leftist fringe: The western imperialists, the U.S. among them, are the biggest mass murderers in history .'The U.S. is even more guilty [of genocide] than Pol Pot. 'it was a good thing that the U.S. lost in Vietnam . If the US and their South Vietnamese stooges had won, South Vietnam would have been yet another place for American companies to move to. Hundreds of thousands more American workers would have lost their jobs. 'Under no circumstances, therefore, should we ever support the US government or believe what it says. [emphases as in the original]
A number of Furrs views are taken directly from Challenge, the Revolutionary Communist Progressive Labor Partys newspaper. Opinion pieces written by Furr on the other hand are published in the school newspaper, The Montclarion, and also posted on his Montclair University website, where he celebrates the violence that took place after the Rodney King verdict, accuses the U.S. of being behind the 1981 assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II and echoing the views of Ward Churchill and Noam Chomsky implies that on Sept.11, 2001 the U.S. got what it deserved when radical Islamists slammed jetliners into the Twin Towers, killing thousands of innocents.
Furr is involved in the Modern Languages Association [MLA], the largest academic professional organization. MLA methods and recommendations are implemented across the U.S., down to the elementary school level. Professor Furr heads the MLAs radical caucus. How much influence does he have in shaping the MLAs agendas? Quite a bit, it appears. During the run-up to its 2003 national conference, the MLA put out a call for papers to be read and discussed at the conference. Out of the five papers submitted, four of them came from the radical caucus. One asked the MLA to work towards the repeal of the U.S.A. Patriot Act. A second wanted the MLA to deplore government war-making projects and urge the withdrawal of troops and reallocation of funds to reverse inattention to, and grave deficits in, funding of education and other human services. A third was concerned with pay for graduate students and faculty members. The last proposal is worth quoting, since it appears to have been penned by Furr himself:
Whereas in wartime, governments commonly shape language to legitimate aggression, misrepresent policies, conceal aims, stigmatize dissent, and block critical thought; and
Whereas distortions of this sort proliferate now, as in the use of the phrase war on terrorism, to underwrite military action anywhere in the world, against whomever our government sees as opponents; and
Whereas we are professionals committed to scrupulous inquiry into language and culture; Be it resolved that the Modern Language Association supports its members in conducting critical analysis of war talk, in public forums and, as appropriate, in classrooms.
What do Professor Furrs students think of him? A sampling of the views of forty of them is available on Rate My Professors, a website which allows students to rate teachers on a scale from 1-5 (Furr averaged 2.4), and gives insight into how Furr is perceived by them: 'I can't believe this man is teaching!... He sends you radical left wing propaganda almost every day through email Pretend to be a communist and he'll think you're the greatest thing ever 'He uses the classroom as a platform to teach his radical political views 'Leans so far to the left he's horizontal Hates the USA 'Keeps on talking about his life and nothing relating to the work 'If he spent more time concentrating on teaching his students than spewing hate in the discussion threads, maybe he would be a happier person!...'What a bitter, hateful man!
Furrs own attitude towards conservatives in academia is this: What [American universities] need, and would much benefit from, is more Marxists, radicals, leftists all terms conventionally applied to those who fight against exploitation, racism, sexism, and capitalism. We can never have too many of these, just as we can never have too few conservatives.
In an academia that has become highly politicized and where conservatives are increasingly rare, Furrs views are valued currency. His web pages are recommended as both a teaching resource and as a resource in developing curricula.
Rocco DiPippo is a free-lance political writer who publishes the Antiprotester Journal.
My beloved field of study is being trod in the mud by people like this.
A "Weird" Churchill for the East Coast!
All they've got left are the useful idiots. The "International Useful Idiots Movement." The "Useful Idiot's Party."
(steely)
This guy makes Ward Churchill seem like a John Bircher in comparison.
It's actually the Eastern GoldFink!
What a nut case!
I've got a question; is there any credible organization that creates a central repository on these academic freak shows? I've got two boys headed to college and while I want them to get real degrees (business, engineering or architecture), I know they have to take a "required" amount of "man's inhumanity to man transcends the class struggle" garbage. But obviously some academic freaks are less unpalatable than others. Is there a resource out there that will alert students to the "freak show" profs? I'd rather not waste my money supporting these idiots by putting my kid in their class.
Typical faux intellectual. When a person offers 'expertise' outside of his field, it's called OPINION. When he uses his professorial identity to lend authority to his opinions while offering them to our children, it's called "aggregious violation of professorial ethics, teacher/student trust, and parental faith."
IMHO, of course. If we want the English prof. to correct the spelling of folks like George Bush and Condi Rice, we'll give him a call.
Today's Communist Motto: One hundred years of failure means nothing!
My dad's alma mater. A certain freeper being pinged went to the high school they used to have on campus as well.
Good handle frogjerk. :)
That's hilarious. Stalin killed most of his revolutionary 'comrades', along with untold millions of others. This brain-dead idiot could have used a time-out in a Stalin-era Gulag.
Only death by stroke probably saved Lenin from the same fate of many of Stalin's "comrades."
"Ideas are more powerful than guns.
If we don't let our people have guns,
why should we let them have ideas." --Josef Stalin
That's a perfect Stalinism - he didn't let them have ideas either!
This school obviously has too much money...
I was surprised and shocked to see this man's name used in this story. I fully intend on looking into this book, and this apparent relative of mine, and discovering what is really going on. I am also a student of history, and of archaeology, particularly of the pre-columbian Midwest, and the theme of this book disturbs me, if only for its blatant and obvious revisionism. If anyone has read this book by James Axtell, please freepmail me and give me your opinion of its contents, importance or lack thereof. I will post an analysis for discussion at some point when I am sure I have all the facts regarding this book, and Axtell's thesis direction.
This bonehead would make the perfect straight man for the comedy team "Churchill/Furr".
Perfect response! I emailed that to the good professor, I hope you don't mind. If anyone else would like to email him, here is his address: furrg@mail.montclair.edu
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.