Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anthrax Story Raises a Bigger Question
self | 03-15-05 | WL-Law

Posted on 03/15/2005 4:19:58 PM PST by WL-law

The latest anthrax reports in military mailrooms -- off-again, on-again, first positive, then negative -- raise an important observation, which is to observe, in retrospect, the MSM's absolutely, totally incurious attitude toward the 9/11 related anthrax attacks during the election cycle.

There were no anthrax-related questions at the debates, no anthrax investigations by the media, no retrospective stories.

Likewise with the so-called 9/11 commission.

It was as if -- it never happened.

Why??

It was, like Ann Coulter said, as if the MSM had their hands over their ears and humming aloud at the thought that someone might bring the subject up.

And there's a reason -- because any thoughtful inquiry points to the 9/11 hijackers themselves as the source, and the link is to Iraq as the source, which makes a WMD connection and an Iraq connection to 9/11.

Can't allow that, can we? That particular truth would, as a necessary consequence, justify the Iraq invasion and support Bush's re-election. No, can't allow that.


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; US: Virginia; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911; alqaeda; amerithrax; anthrax; antraz; cbw; jihadinamerica; koranimals; sept11; usps; waronterror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 03/15/2005 4:20:08 PM PST by WL-law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WL-law

Much like the Washington Snipers, the MSM pinned the crime on some rightwing crazy. Their story fell apart, and we are left, still, with the most obvious culprit being an Islamist - so of course the press is going to bury the topic.

Then again, some of the more extreme elements of the Left still claim the anthrax mailings were some deep dark government conspiracy a la Babs Hatch Rosenberg.


2 posted on 03/15/2005 4:32:34 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
The whole anthrax topic so quickly disappeared that some of us probably thought we'd imagined it. In fact, the source of the story that Saddam had 8500 liters of weaponized anthrax was...Saddam himself. That was what he'd told the UN. Hans Blix estimated that instead of destroying it between 1988 and 1991 as he'd claimed, he increased that amount to 10,000 liters.

...that turned up where? Well, nowhere, yet. The spores are extremely difficult to destroy, and Saddam was required to present proof that he had, in fact, destroyed them. And the reason Blix was so skeptical was that in order to do so he would have had to come up with some new (and potentially very useful) method unknown as yet to Western science.

Perhaps Saddam was lying and this amount never existed, the test results having been faked. Other than that the best we can hope for is that he dumped it in a pit in the desert somewhere, in which case the only ones at hazard are the poor nomads or travelers who might happen across the stuff and die a most unpleasant death. But if it did exist and was not destroyed there is a large amount of very nasty stuff that might turn up anywhere.

3 posted on 03/15/2005 4:35:14 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

4 posted on 03/15/2005 4:36:41 PM PST by rocksblues (Rino's = Collins, Snowe, DeWine, Graham, Specter, McCain developing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

The MSM continues to show its pathetic political bias, desire to obstruct a functional President through deliberate omissions, lies, and half-truths in their so-called reporting. I don't know about you, but I am having a hard time really figuring out WHO THE REAL ENEMIES OF THIS COUNTRY ARE...both INTERNAL and EXTERNAL...


5 posted on 03/15/2005 4:45:26 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Much like the Washington Snipers, the MSM pinned the crime on some rightwing crazy. Their story fell apart, and we are left, still, with the most obvious culprit being an Islamist - so of course the press is going to bury the topic.
Then again, some of the more extreme elements of the Left still claim the anthrax mailings were some deep dark government conspiracy a la Babs Hatch Rosenberg.

The reality is that there's been nothing to report, hence nothing has been reported.

Anything of substance about the case will come from the FBI, and they've said nothing.

The Bush Administration, then, must be behind the coverup of the Anthrax being Al Queda/Iraqi...err, wait, why, exactly, would they cover that up?

I personally believe the case will never be solved. If it was it would have been already.

6 posted on 03/15/2005 4:49:46 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
The Mainstreamers are still angry that Tribune Group and the New York Times were not attacked. Insted, the only print publication involved was AMI who puts out such major periodicals as National Enquirer and Star.

I suspect the NBC and New York Post letters were addressed to those locations solely for the purpose of routing them through certain postal facilities in New York.

That is, that the intention of the attack was to disable the postal service in key locations, e.g. the nation's capital, and New York's business and communications center downtown!

7 posted on 03/15/2005 4:53:55 PM PST by muawiyah (gonna' be like with the anthrax thing ~ find a guy, harass him, let the terrorists escape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Huh?

The press voraciously opposed the notion that the mailings were the work of Islamists from early on and stuck to their story, even when there were interesting substories that would have made it into the news had they fit the MSM's profile.

That pattern will continue for the forseeable future.



8 posted on 03/15/2005 5:10:07 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Yes, the Washington snipers would seem to be a big story with a lot of human interest, which could increase circulation and ratings, but they buried it as soon as they found out who the perps were.

They used to excuse their excesses as resulting from the boss's greed, but it's clear that ideology trumps earnings any day of the week.


9 posted on 03/15/2005 5:25:39 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Battle Axe

"Fake envelopes" don't count.


11 posted on 03/15/2005 5:47:32 PM PST by muawiyah (gonna' be like with the anthrax thing ~ find a guy, harass him, let the terrorists escape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
What...did the author expect that a HUGE THREAT to the VERY FOUNDATIONS OF CIVILIZATION should garner one hundredth the publicity of a women in California being murdered by her husband on Christmas Eve?

How naive can they be?

12 posted on 03/15/2005 6:14:29 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73; The Duke
I have thought from the beginning that our leadership knows that Saddam was behind the anthrax and we didn't reveal it because 1). we didn't want to cause panic, 2). we didn't want to let the Iraqi's know that we knew, because they might cut loose with more, 3). before we took them with ease, we might have had to follow through with our unwritten policy of meeting non-conventional attack with our own massive non-conventional attack.

Now, that we have won and Saddam is in custody, why don't we just come out with some evidence that he was behind it?

13 posted on 03/15/2005 6:48:42 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I remember seeing some of the younger Islamist's prison drawings posted on the net. It removed any and all doubts that this was Islamist terror to my mind.

Did the drawings ever make it onto the alphabets? I don't recall them being covered, but by viewership of the MSM is rather spotty nowadays.


14 posted on 03/15/2005 7:02:24 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Well my own take is that FBI blew the investigation so badly that the government knows about the same amount we do - it was probably Islamists, seeing the cutaneous anthrax infection specifically a group working closely with the 9/11 hijackers, and that they probably got the anthrax from Iraq - but that is about it.

I am to this day intrigued though by Atta seeking a loan on a small plane that he could modify to be a "crop duster", seeing as Iraq had designed anthrax drop tanks, one of which was never accounted for...


15 posted on 03/15/2005 7:06:07 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

Bingo.
Your point 3 should be number 1, in bold. That's what its all about IMO.


16 posted on 03/15/2005 7:12:45 PM PST by IYAAYAS (Live free or die trying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Just noting that a weaponized anthrax attack would be devastating.

The postal outlet in Miami hit by two (which remained sealed) letters has finally be reopened after 3 and half years.

The aftermath of an attack: Imagine a ghost town city for 50 years. Electric fences around it to prevent animals from going in and out. Hunters stationed 24/7 around the whole area shooting down birds going in and out so they cannot spread the spores. Anytime a big wind hits the city, the fences have to moved outward. Everyone within airborne range having to vaccinated with (an effective) vaccine. Skeletons left all over the area from people who died in the 2 weeks after the attack trying to escape the city and dragging the spores along with them as they flee.

A nuke attack would likely be easier to handle than a major anthrax attack.


17 posted on 03/15/2005 7:12:55 PM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: WL-law

They seemed to leave out the muslim connection to O.C. bombing, too.


19 posted on 03/15/2005 7:14:33 PM PST by Jackknife (No man is entitled to the blessings of freedom unless he be vigilant in its preservation.-MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battle Axe

I wonder if any information about the strain of this sample will be released - is it the same weaponized stuff from 2001?


20 posted on 03/15/2005 7:15:52 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson