Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama pushes for increased ethanol production
CBS 2 Chicago ^ | March 14, 2005 | AP

Posted on 03/14/2005 7:10:16 PM PST by Land_of_Lincoln_John

PEKIN, Ill. (AP) U.S. Sen. Barack Obama urged Congress Monday to end a two-year stalemate that has stifled production of ethanol, a corn-based fuel additive that he says could create more than 200,000 new jobs and ease the nation's dependance on foreign oil.

The freshman Democrat says higher ethanol production targets should be broken out of a federal energy bill that has repeatedly stalled over disputes about drilling and liability for water supplies contaminated by the gasoline additive MTBE.

Boosting ethanol production has broad, bipartisan congressional support, but has been ``held hostage'' by other concerns over the energy bill, Obama said.

``Now is the opportunity to get this done not only for the future of our farmers, the future of our economy and the future of our environment, but to make our country a place that is independent and innovative enough to control its own energy future,'' Obama said in a statement after touring an ethanol plant in Pekin.

Ethanol's opponents argue that the additive requires more energy to produce than it saves. They also say ethanol has fallen short of its promises to help the environment and reduce dependence on foreign oil.

Obama is a member of the Senate Energy and Public Works Committee, which is scheduled to begin debate Wednesday on whether to break ethanol out of the energy bill and how high to set targets for ethanol production.

The nation's ethanol production is expected to top 4 billion gallons this year, and some supporters have advocated doubling that by 2012. They say raising production could ultimately boost corn prices by 25 cents a bushel, which would pump an extra $375 million a year into the Illinois farm economy.

Though he has not settled on a production goal, Obama said boosting the nation's ethanol output is a ``no-brainer'' that would spawn new plants, creating jobs and saving $4 billion a year in imported oil and gasoline costs.

``Today, if you pull into a gas station and want to fill up your tank, you're paying some of the highest prices of all time,'' Obama said. ``And if you turn on the news, you can see that our dependence on foreign oil is keeping us tied to one of the most dangerous and unstable places in the world.''


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: barackobama; ethanol; obama; peoria; saintobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
...you can see that our dependence on foreign oil is keeping us tied to one of the most dangerous and unstable places in the world.

Not sure what Obama's position on ANWR drilling is, but I pretty certain he's against it.

Also, just last week, Obama voted against the Clear Skies Act, which would've greatly benefited the domestic coal industry--including what's left of the coal mininig industry in southern Illinois.

None of this, of course, is brought up in this lame AP article.

Senate Panel Deadlocks Over Pollution Bill (Clear Skies Can't Get Out of Committee)

1 posted on 03/14/2005 7:10:17 PM PST by Land_of_Lincoln_John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Hey!

Pekin, Illinois!

That's where I grew up.

We were the Pekin Chinks back then. (Now its the Pekin Dragons.)


2 posted on 03/14/2005 7:14:15 PM PST by KidGlock (W-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Yeah, lets depend on Ethanol. A freak cold storm pops up and wipes out the whole crop! Good idea.


3 posted on 03/14/2005 7:15:43 PM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

My take on the Clear Skies Initiative was a win/win for the environment and industry. It set deadlines and limits that are stringent but achievable. Suing the coal industry yields few long-term benefits.


4 posted on 03/14/2005 7:16:17 PM PST by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

I remember some great Pekin basketball teams in the 1960s.

Always got a kick out of the Chinks nickname. Not surprised it got changed. Also remember a small southern Illinois team making it to the finals called the Cobden Appleknockers. Thye lost to Chicago Carver.


5 posted on 03/14/2005 7:20:33 PM PST by wingman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Ethanol's opponents argue that the additive requires more energy to produce than it saves. They also say ethanol has fallen short of its promises to help the environment and reduce dependence on foreign oil.

Because ethanol requires more energy to produce than it delivers as a fuel, we are burning more oil than we would without ethanol!

6 posted on 03/14/2005 7:24:24 PM PST by DrDavid (Support Global Warming: Surf the Hebrides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Not sure what Obama's position on ANWR drilling is, but I pretty certain he's against it.
=====
If it walks like a lib, talks like a lib, smells like a lib, yes, you have a lib....pandering to the enviro-whackos -- another part of their highly respectable voting base.... :-)


7 posted on 03/14/2005 7:24:42 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
If you ever wanted to point to one single catastrophic failure of the environmental socialist movement in America, you need to go no further than MTBE! These idiots would just as soon poison you as long as the air from your SUV was 2% cleaner!

As the tag line say, "All I needed to learn about environmentalism, I learned when the environmentalist introduced America to MTBE."

8 posted on 03/14/2005 7:32:13 PM PST by Shortwave (Supporting Bush was a duty one owed to the fallen. Now, it is an honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Though he has not settled on a production goal, Obama said boosting the nation's ethanol output is a ``no-brainer'' that would spawn new plants, creating jobs and saving $4 billion a year in imported oil and gasoline costs.

He's for gigantic stills, but would never let an oil refinery be built here.

9 posted on 03/14/2005 7:32:16 PM PST by X-FID (In their eyes there's something lacking---what they need's a damn good whacking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KidGlock

I live in Chicago and buy my Christmas tree every year at a farm in Pekin. Whatever happened to the Chink Rink?


10 posted on 03/14/2005 7:34:12 PM PST by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Remember - Barack Obama is a "rock star," so when he talks, we all must listen, even though he's a freshman senator in a dying, minority party.


11 posted on 03/14/2005 7:35:59 PM PST by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shortwave; EagleUSA; X-FID; DrDavid; Land_of_Lincoln_John; wingman1; Righty_McRight; KidGlock



""Because ethanol requires more energy to produce than it delivers as a fuel, we are burning more oil than we would without ethanol! """

- DrDavid

(Sorry, but I thought everyone had to read this line)

That's what I thought. Obama Osama, Osama bin WHATEVER his name is, is lying.


12 posted on 03/14/2005 7:37:45 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Well, he and his colleagues certainly produce enough methane to keep the country fuelled.


13 posted on 03/14/2005 7:38:20 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama urged Congress Monday to end a two-year stalemate that has stifled production of ethanol

Give me your white. Your black. Your former Klansmen. Your race pimps. Even your WWII war heroes.

And then watch them all speak the praises of ethanol as the ADM campaign contributions land in their campaign war chests.

ADM doesn't discriminate. They corrupt everyone in Washington.

14 posted on 03/14/2005 7:38:37 PM PST by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

I read that title no less than six times, wondering why bin Laden would be pro-ethanol


15 posted on 03/14/2005 7:39:11 PM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

The risks and the benefits should go to the farmers of Illinois. If ethanol can drive all of their farm equipment needed in production, in marketing and in distribution--they will have earned their money.


16 posted on 03/14/2005 7:44:18 PM PST by jolie560
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrDavid

From http://www.iowacorn.org/ethanol/ethanol_3b.html

Q: Does it take more energy to produce a gallon of ethanol than the energy we get out of it?

A: No. Research indicates an approximate 38% gain in the overall corn-to-ethanol process and use of that ethanol for fuel. Corn yields and processing technologies have improved significantly over the past 20 years and they continue to do so, making ethanol production less and less energy intensive.


17 posted on 03/14/2005 7:44:21 PM PST by curlewbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

That will never happen, Obama-the government enjoys much more taxes from corn turned to booze, than it ever could from a tax upon a gas additive.


18 posted on 03/14/2005 7:45:19 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (When the left hates you, rejoice, for you are right!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

I bought OTD last week @ $1.35


19 posted on 03/14/2005 7:46:09 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (NO PRISONERS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I don't see ADM advertising like the did in the past. I always saw them on the NBC talking head show.


20 posted on 03/14/2005 7:46:53 PM PST by X-FID (In their eyes there's something lacking---what they need's a damn good whacking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson