To: snarkytart
Since they're not naming the two officers who were supposed to be "manning" the video cameras, I guess we can safely assume what gender they are.
141 posted on
03/14/2005 12:21:24 PM PST by
Chief_Joe
(From where the sun now sits, I will fight on -FOREVER!!!)
To: Chief_Joe
Since they're not naming the two officers who were supposed to be "manning" the video cameras, I guess we can safely assume what gender they are.
What the heck is this? What on earth difference does it make what gender the monitors were? Whoever they are, they certainly have some explaining to do, regardless of whether they are men, women, or one of each.
148 posted on
03/14/2005 12:48:26 PM PST by
KJC1
To: Chief_Joe
Since they're not naming the two officers who were supposed to be "manning" the video cameras, I guess we can safely assume what gender they are. You guessed correctly, they must have been male.
159 posted on
03/14/2005 2:15:41 PM PST by
Sally'sConcerns
(My sister, Alexis the Bengal Kitty! Glad you finally signed up! Welcome aboard!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson