To: Chief_Joe
Since they're not naming the two officers who were supposed to be "manning" the video cameras, I guess we can safely assume what gender they are.
What the heck is this? What on earth difference does it make what gender the monitors were? Whoever they are, they certainly have some explaining to do, regardless of whether they are men, women, or one of each.
148 posted on
03/14/2005 12:48:26 PM PST by
KJC1
To: KJC1
What the heck is this? What the heck is this?
Everyone is assuming two deputies were actually assigned to monitor the video camera. The article says two deputies were supposed to be manning the video. My bet is that they were actually being used in some other capacity at the time.
That would also explain why no deputies have been named.
To: KJC1
...What on earth difference does it make what gender the monitors were? Whoever they are, they certainly have some explaining to do, regardless of whether they ... women...I don't think its right to get all worked up in a tizzy about this yet -I'm just curious about their genders. I'd also like to know why they aren't showing the actual video of the woman sheriff getting overpowered by the prisoner. Could it be grandma was busy trying to get peek instead of doing her job?
153 posted on
03/14/2005 1:52:22 PM PST by
Chief_Joe
(From where the sun now sits, I will fight on -FOREVER!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson