[governsleastgovernsbest]

The article seems factual, and to have the ring of truth.

However, the author loses me when he says:

"The Clinton Administration's policy apparently was designed . . . to create a huge new malignant communist superpower able to threaten the United States with annihilation."

Much as I disliked Clinton, and don't doubt that he was trying to avoid embarrassment, etc., the author seems clearly to suggest that for some reason it was Clinton's DESIRE to see the survival of the US threatened.

He is accusing Clinton of the worst kind of active, aggressive treason. He'd have to back up that kind of charge with more than I've seen in his report before I'd belive it.

[marvlus]

I agree with what you said. I would email the author and challenge him on that statement. Here's his email id: Chris.Field@HumanEventsOnline.com

[massgopguy]

How about a mushroom cloud for confirmation. The DF-41 can now reach Omaha.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Nah.

Granted, that is a "rather inflammatory" statement (for a repubbie to make, but pales in comparison with what the democrats have been saying for years in their official policy statements and speeches INSIDE Congress!), but can be backed up by 8 years of actions by Hillary's White House.

[EagleUSA]

He is accusing Clinton of the worst kind of active, aggressive treason.
======
Clinton's treasonous activity is already a matter of hard history and is well documented. He should be in prison for it. It is best documented in Bill Gertz' book, BETRAYAL. The important thing to realize, is that Clinton never really sought TO HURT the U.S. as a PRIMARY motive for his treasonous activity -- as usual with the Clintoons, IT IS ABOUT SELF AND MONEY. Clinton's reward for pedaling missle guidance technology to the Chinese was MONEY. Again it is all captured nicely in Gertz' book, detailing all (or the key) connections and activity.

What is totally frightening about the whole Clintoon debacle is HOW THEY ACTUALLY GOT AWAY WITH IT and walk the streets freely. I will continue to say we have a MAJOR PROBLEM in Washington (the Congress).

[Lee'sGhost]

"the author seems clearly to suggest that for some reason it was Clinton's DESIRE to see the survival of the US threatened."

I don't think it was meant to compromise "survival" but rather to acheive the lib goal of making the US no more powerful than our enemies. Remember, dims/libs don't want the US to be MORE powerful or to be the world's leader. Just ask the editor of the Washington Post. (See recent thread "WASH POST Editor to CHINA DAILY: 'I don't think U.S. should be the leader of the world'".)