I don't know how else one can read the author's statement " the Clinton Administration's policy apparently was designed to . . . to create a huge new malignant communist superpower able to threaten the United States with annihilation."
Once a "huge, new malignant communist superpower" with nuclear abilities is created, there is obviously no sure way to control it.
But even accepting your view, that the goal was not to threaten the US's survival but only to bring us down to the level of our enemies, that would still constitute the worst kind of treason. Again, I don't see the evidence that this was not merely the RESULT of Clinton's actions, but his "DESIGN."
Ah, let me clarify. I'm not saying that's what the author was saying -- you are probably right about that. I'm saying that's what the Klinton action was about. Still treason, but I don't think even Beezlebubba is for our annihilation
Does it really matter why clinton did it? Wether he did it for money or for bring china up it is still TREASON.