Posted on 03/14/2005 7:44:16 AM PST by hinterlander
It is so disgusting and sickening.
bump
And WHY aren't the individuals responsible for this obscene lapse in nuclear security in prison? WHY are there no indictments against Clinton, Reno, Gore, Berger, Richardson, O'Leary, etc.?
This was NOT sloppiness or incompetence. It was a full fledged conspiracy to betray America, under the GUISE of being sloppy.
And that my FRiends, is treason, a crime which has apparently been decriminalized.
The article seems factual, and to have the ring of truth.
However, the author loses me when he says:
"The Clinton Administration's policy apparently was designed . . . to create a huge new malignant communist superpower able to threaten the United States with annihilation."
Much as I disliked Clinton, and don't doubt that he was trying to avoid embarrassment, etc., the author seems clearly to suggest that for some reason it was Clinton's DESIRE to see the survival of the US threatened.
He is accusing Clinton of the worst kind of active, aggressive treason. He'd have to back up that kind of charge with more than I've seen in his report before I'd belive it.
bump
I agree with what you said. I would email the author and challenge him on that statement. Here's his email id: Chris.Field@HumanEventsOnline.com
How about a mushroom cloud for confirmation. The DF-41 can now reach Omaha.
The Rats are only interested into getting back in power so that they can screw up the country at a faster rate than it is now. There is no need for national security.
Shiite!
(I have an idea! Let's wait for Dan Rather to promote this scandal in his next 60 Minutes show!)
He is accusing Clinton of the worst kind of active, aggressive treason.
======
Clinton's treasonous activity is already a matter of hard history and is well documented. He should be in prison for it. It is best documented in Bill Gertz' book, BETRAYAL. The important thing to realize, is that Clinton never really sought TO HURT the U.S. as a PRIMARY motive for his treasonous activity -- as usual with the Clintoons, IT IS ABOUT SELF AND MONEY. Clinton's reward for pedaling missle guidance technology to the Chinese was MONEY. Again it is all captured nicely in Gertz' book, detailing all (or the key) connections and activity.
What is totally frightening about the whole Clintoon debacle is HOW THEY ACTUALLY GOT AWAY WITH IT and walk the streets freely. I will continue to say we have a MAJOR PROBLEM in Washington (the Congress).
"the author seems clearly to suggest that for some reason it was Clinton's DESIRE to see the survival of the US threatened."
I don't think it was meant to compromise "survival" but rather to acheive the lib goal of making the US no more powerful than our enemies. Remember, dims/libs don't want the US to be MORE powerful or to be the world's leader. Just ask the editor of the Washington Post. (See recent thread "WASH POST Editor to CHINA DAILY: 'I don't think U.S. should be the leader of the world'".)
More clues as to what was stuffed down Sandy Berger's pants.
I don't doubt that Clinton would jeopardize US security to further his political/financial interests. But when the author says that Clinton's actions were "designed" to do that, it clearly seems to indicate that such was Clinton's GOAL. I simply don't see the evidence for that.
If it's true, then Clinton is the worst traitor in US history. It would certainly be very damning of Bush 41 & 43 too, for that matter. Knowing what they know, how could they possibly fraternize with Clinton, send him off to represent the country, etc?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.