Skip to comments.
NY Times: Iraq Had WMD 'Stockpiles' in 2003
News Max ^
| March 13, 2005
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 03/13/2005 7:26:41 AM PST by MisterRepublican
In a stunning about-face, the New York Times reported Sunday that when the U.S. attacked Iraq in March 2003, Saddam Hussein possessed "stockpiles of monitored chemicals and materials," as well as sophisticated equipment to manufacture nuclear and biological weapons, which was removed to "a neighboring state" before the U.S. could secure the weapons sites.
The U.N.'s Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission [Unmovic], "has filed regular reports to the Security Council since last May," the paper said, "about the dismantlement of important weapons installations and "the export of dangerous materials to foreign states."
"Officials of the commission and the [International] Atomic Energy Agency have repeatedly called on the Iraqi government to report on what it knows of the fate of the thousands of pieces of monitored equipment and stockpiles of monitored chemicals and materials."
Last fall, IAEA director Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei confirmed that "nuclear-related materials" had gone missing from monitored sites, calling on the interim Iraqi government to start the process of accounting for the missing stockpiles still ostensibly under the agency's supervision.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2003; araji; bsmeteronhigh; draraji; goofyanan; iraq; nukesmissing; nyslimes; nyt; nytracktracking; stockpiles; unbungling; unsucks; wmd; wmdwasthere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-237 next last
To: MisterRepublican
2
posted on
03/13/2005 7:28:12 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(George W Bush-Bringing a new democracy every term..)
To: MisterRepublican
I must be having a dream...
3
posted on
03/13/2005 7:28:25 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(ErnBatavia, Boxer, Pelosi, Thomas...the ultimate nightmare Menage a Quatro)
To: MisterRepublican
I am not believing my eyes.
What's Chrissy Matthews et al. going to say now that it's in the Rat bible?
4
posted on
03/13/2005 7:29:00 AM PST
by
wouldntbprudent
("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
To: MisterRepublican
When is the NYT's going to tell the American people, Democrats excluded, something we don't already know?
5
posted on
03/13/2005 7:30:47 AM PST
by
hflynn
To: johnny7; TomGuy; maryz; Lonesome in Massachussets; JLO; gidget7; nopardons; Kenny Bunk; GianniV; ...
6
posted on
03/13/2005 7:31:03 AM PST
by
bitt
("Conservatism is the dominant political creed in America,")
To: MisterRepublican
The United Nations, worried that the nuclear material and equipment could be used in clandestine bomb production, has been hunting for it throughout the Middle East, largely unsuccessfully, the Times said. The UN is "hunting" for something they said doesn't exist, and the NY Times is reporting it?
Is this an alternate reality?
7
posted on
03/13/2005 7:32:11 AM PST
by
Noachian
(Impeach a Judge - Save a Nation)
To: MisterRepublican
Is this story at the NY Slimes or just this from Newsmax?
8
posted on
03/13/2005 7:32:19 AM PST
by
SeaBiscuit
(God Bless all who defend America and the rest can go to hell.)
To: MisterRepublican
Good news!
Another loss for the liberal MSM.
Time to bring out all pots here on FR re WMDs in Iraq and how they were transported to Syria.
9
posted on
03/13/2005 7:32:35 AM PST
by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: MisterRepublican
Welcome aboard, NYT.
Better late than never.
Now go sit in the corner and shut up.
10
posted on
03/13/2005 7:32:52 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: MisterRepublican
Not to worry. The UN is on it!!!!
The United Nations, worried that the nuclear material and equipment could be used in clandestine bomb production, has been hunting for it throughout the Middle East, largely unsuccessfully, the Times said.
Now, won't you sleep better tonite ?
11
posted on
03/13/2005 7:33:00 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: MisterRepublican
This story validates my suspicion that the WMD's were removed before and shortly after the beginning of the war. But George W. Bush never "LIED" about their existence like the liberals like to claim.
12
posted on
03/13/2005 7:33:01 AM PST
by
MisterRepublican
(I DEMAND THAT FOX NEWS GET JENNIFER ECCLESTON BACK FROM NBC!)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: ScaniaBoy
14
posted on
03/13/2005 7:33:27 AM PST
by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: MisterRepublican
how many rats based their voting in november 2004 on this one issue?
that "bush lied to us".
when we knew damn well that president bush had the same information that john kerry, hillary clinton, ted kennedy, tom daschle ad infinitum had.
you'd have to be a moron to watch television as your source of "news".
15
posted on
03/13/2005 7:34:26 AM PST
by
ken21
( today's luxury development. tomorrow's slum.)
To: SeaBiscuit
This can't be right. This would be the story of the decade if it is. The Times would spin this story differently. Definitely have to wait and see on this one.
16
posted on
03/13/2005 7:34:59 AM PST
by
speedy
To: MisterRepublican
As Raymond's father would say..... "HOLY CRAP!!!"
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: MisterRepublican
In a stunning about-face, the New York Times reported Sunday that when the U.S. attacked Iraq in March 2003, Saddam Hussein possessed "stockpiles of monitored chemicals and materials,"
Geez, at times NewsMax gets as stupid as WingNutDaily.
.
Key word there is "monitored." The monitored stuff wasn't in violation of UN resolutions. This isn't exactly some startling revelation.
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-237 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson