Skip to comments.
Crazed Bush hater [Liberal "Man" Attacks Woman]
The Washington Times, INSIDE POLITICS ^
| 3/11/05
| Greg Pierce
Posted on 03/12/2005 2:48:11 PM PST by Doctor Raoul
Edited on 03/12/2005 2:50:54 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
A man apparently enraged by a Bush-Cheney sticker on a woman's sport utility vehicle chased her for miles and tried to run her off the road while holding up an anti-Bush sign, said police in Tampa, Fla.
"He told our officers that he just got mad at her, so he went after her," said police spokesman Joe Durkin.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: attacks; bush; crazed; hater; liberal; man; michaelmoore; pest; proterror; woman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Balding_Eagle
You have to be a paying member to use the search function...
Not surprised the blame was placed on the woman and they also probably said "this stuff happens to Dems all the time, but the Corporate Right Wing media ignores it."
21
posted on
03/12/2005 3:13:57 PM PST
by
Guillermo
(Vote for Pedro)
To: Doctor Raoul
I agree that what this man did was beyond the pale. However, the middle finger is inciteful. I once gave it to a woman who beeped at me on I-95 near Fredericksburg, VA, and she tried to avenge herself by pulling in front of me and slamming on the brakes.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
#1 She admitted she raised her finger AFTER he began harassing her
#2 So what? We are supposed to respond to a raised finger by trying to run someone off the road?
23
posted on
03/12/2005 3:15:38 PM PST
by
GOP_Proud
(Those who proclaim tolerance have the least for my views.)
To: Doctor Raoul
again I say, this is a political hate crime
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This asshole would not have done this if there was a guy in the car and there was a Marine sticker next to the Bush sign. So he's a coward, period. They have a conceal and carry law in Florida too bad she wasn't packing.
25
posted on
03/12/2005 3:37:05 PM PST
by
Recon Dad
(Big tough guy)
To: Texas_Jarhead
26
posted on
03/12/2005 3:37:26 PM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(Support Our Troops, Spit On A Reporter)
To: Doctor Raoul
Probably would have had a much different outcome had this happened in, say, Texas.
27
posted on
03/12/2005 3:37:43 PM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("..nunchuck skills, bo-staff skills, computer hacking skills....")
To: Texas_Jarhead
Impossible I've read the statutes and they all explicitly say politicial hate crimes can only be committed by republicans.
28
posted on
03/12/2005 3:39:11 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: Texas_Jarhead
Let's ditch the words "hate crime". A crime is a crime, period. That said, politically-motivated violence deserves the maximum penalty that the law can provide - this nation more than any other cannot tolerate violent political intimidation, it goes against everything this country stands for.
Looks like DU will be short a poster for a few years.
29
posted on
03/12/2005 3:40:02 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(I believe in the power of free markets to do good)
To: Doctor Raoul
With a name like Norman Winkler; one can't help being a p*ssy.
30
posted on
03/12/2005 3:41:13 PM PST
by
Spruce
To: Doctor Raoul
Nathan Alan Winkler, 31, lives at home with Dad. That figures."
Lives in daddys basement with his black light room where he blows his mind out with all kinds of drugs and than goes out and attacks women with children in the car. Liberalism =Mental Illness.
31
posted on
03/12/2005 3:42:58 PM PST
by
John Lenin
(A little anarchy and it's curtains)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In all fairness, in the article I read, it appears that Ms. Fernandez might have given this sad sack the finger
yea, same thing happened to me, a Bush fan. A Kerry sticker sportin SUV babe flipped me the bird so I followed her and terrorized her beyond belief. All is fair........ /sarcasm Sheesh!
32
posted on
03/12/2005 3:43:31 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(After 32 years of dealing with stupid people I still haven't earned the right to just shoot them.)
To: Doctor Raoul
Stickers on the backs of cars can really send people over the edge it seems. It might be better to be travel stickerless.
To: Doctor Raoul
Look at the eyes. Liberalism is a mental illness.
34
posted on
03/12/2005 3:45:11 PM PST
by
230FMJ
(...from my cold, dead, fingers.)
To: thoughtomator
"Let's ditch the words "hate crime""
I will do no such thing.
"That said, politically-motivated violence deserves the maximum penalty that the law can provide - this nation more than any other cannot tolerate violent political intimidation, it goes against everything this country stands for."
Exactly. Liberals have deployed the construct and I will use it against them directly or to illustrate is absurdity whenever possible.
To: thoughtomator
To: Doctor Raoul
"I know that he's very anti-Bush. But I don't see him doing anything like that. He's the least aggressive person I know." I guess his dad knows a lot of aggressive people.
To: Brilliant
When he smokes pot he is harmless, dad can't even get him to go out and look for a job cause all he wants to do is look at porn on the internet and eat dorritos ...
38
posted on
03/12/2005 3:51:54 PM PST
by
John Lenin
(A little anarchy and it's curtains)
To: Doctor Raoul
At one point the man pulled his car in front of Fernandez's, got out and started running toward her, Fernandez told police.AT that point, he's extremely fortunate that Ms. Fernandez did not use the 1-2 ton weapon she was sitting inside of and run his pathetic hiney over.
39
posted on
03/12/2005 3:54:48 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: Texas_Jarhead
I'm just enunciating the principle that a just society cannot criminalize thought, only action. Using the term "hate crime", even as a foil, concedes the possibility that it is legitimate to criminalize thought. If you concede that, they will follow by criminalizing
our thoughts, as they have tried before and will most certainly try again. Don't give them grounds to stand on.
The place to take motivation into account is in sentencing, not in the definition of a crime.
40
posted on
03/12/2005 3:55:22 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(I believe in the power of free markets to do good)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson