Posted on 03/12/2005 12:58:17 AM PST by nickcarraway
On February 24th, a few days before a Florida judge issued Terri Schiavo a stay of execution until the 18th of March, I wrote for the first time on a subject I admittedly knew little about in a piece titled Decision on Terry Schiavo Case Too Difficult.
As I stated in that piece, I was writing in response to reader mail asking me to take a position on a national debate that I had spent little time researching. Both before and since, I have been inundated with mail from folks on both sides of the debate, most of whom, knew little more about the matter, many of whom knew even less than I did.
The purpose of my piece was to first flush out the real facts for my own benefit, second point out how little people knew about the topic despite their emotionally charged rantings, and last to point out the short comings of our judiciary process in such a matter.
I have been called about every name under the sun for appearing to not take a side in that article, yet I did take a side, the only side I could take, Terris side. Not her husbands side, not her parents side, though I stated clearly that I related to their position best, not the courts side as they had failed the family miserably and not the peoples side, but Terris side
A dear writer friend, Joan Swirsky wrote probably the best piece I have read on the topic in her article Why Terri (and All Compromised Children) Should Live , in which she so eloquently places the debate on the proper footing.
I have also since received and reviewed the full medical report ordered by the court, issued by Dr. Jay Wolfson, in which he states that Terri is for all practical purposes, unable to sustain life on her own.
Not being a doctor myself, I asked a medical professional in whom I have great trust, to review the file and provide an open unbiased medical opinion of that report, regarding Terris current condition only. In short, that opinion states that Terris life is only threatened by her inability to swallow food orally, therefore requiring a feeding tube, not life support in traditional terms.
This goes to the heart of one of the statements I made in my first piece. We are not talking about unplugging Terri from artificial life support here but rather denying her the same nourishment necessary to sustain any of our lives
Do you have any idea how many people in this country require a feeding tube for one reason or another? Many of them otherwise, very healthy. Unable to take nourishment orally, is this the factor for deciding who should or should not live now?
Then I have received a mountain of documentation concerning how Terri may have actually entered her current condition, and it appears that certain state agencies in Florida have some 30 pieces of evidence now being entered into the court proceedings, questioning the quality of her husbands treatment of her and care, before, during and since her collapse some 14 years ago
Then there is the issue of husband Michael Schiavo, who has long since attempted to move on with his life, Terri clearly having already outlived her usefulness in his world.
But as so eloquently stated by Joan Swirsky, later confirmed in medical terms by the physicians I asked to review Terris file, Terris life still has great value to others in this world, her parents and many of us who believe life in all forms has value, great value.
In short, the more I learned about this case, the more amazed I became that there even was a case. That any court would even consider denying Terri simple basic nourishment, for any reason, regardless of her husbands motives
It became very clear to me that we are not talking about euthanasia, assisted death by medical procedure. It became clear that we are not even talking about letting God decide her fate by unplugging her from life support keeping her heart pumping, her lungs breathing and her kidneys functioning
We are talking about murder by starvation, plain and simple. Terris husband no longer has any use for Terri. She is no longer the young vibrant carefree model he once pledged his life to. He has found another to fill that void in his life and Terri is standing in his way of personal happiness, so in his mind, it is time for her to die.
Meanwhile, Terris life remains of great value to those who have loved her since birth, those who never loved her for her outward beauty, her ability to cook and clean, to perform the expected duties of a wife. Those who simply loved her for who she was, their daughter, their friend, loved her for who she still is today in their hearts and minds.
I have now seen enough of the allegations concerning the husbands questionable behavior throughout this affair. I have seen the medical report ordered by the court, and the review by independent physicians I trust personally.
This matter could not possibly be any more cut and dried than it is To remove Terris feeding tube is no different than denying a plate of food to millions sitting in nursing homes across this country, just because they are physically unable to pick up a fork or spoon and feed themselves or unable to swallow
My father has Alzheimers and while he remains able to feed himself today, there well may come a day when he is not able to anymore. If and when that day comes, I will happily help him eat When he no longer knows my name or my face, I will remind him daily. When he is no longer able to manage even restroom visits, I will gladly manage them for him, as he managed mine before I learned to manage them myself
This is all a part of life the caring for each other, those who represent great value in our lives. To deny Terris parents the chance to care for her on the basis that her husband no longer has a use for her should not be a debate, it should be a crime
This matter is just that simple I stand for Terri, who still has great value in this world, who only requires love and care and basic nourishment to sustain life all the same things you and I require I fear what our society has become if we allow her to be starved to death Who will be next?
At the end of the day, it seems to me that every life is precious to someone and it should be. We must respect every life, no matter how imperfect, or we will risk respecting none Some things can be subjective The value of life is not one of them!
JB Williams is a businessman, a husband, a father, and a no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy.
Thank you for posting this, nick. Do you ever sleep? ;)
Good question!
If this cruelty is allowed to happy to Terri, it will set a precedent, and soon they will trying to kill us and claim justification. This should never be allowed to happen the first time.
|
Judge Greer cited "news sources" that Sara Scantlin could BLINK her eyes on command "so she was not in PVS". Father Pavone witnessed Terri's condition just one month ago [jump ahead to the 17 min mark] and he said:
|
Documented Terri-vocabulary references | |
Words | Witness |
"mommy" "momma" "help me" |
nurse - Heidi Law, certified nurse assistant |
"pai[n]" (meaning 'pain' when she was in discomfort) 'Haaaiiiii' (meaning Hi, in response to 'Hi Terri') 'mommy' 'help me' |
Nurse - Carla Sauer Iyer, R.N. "'Help me' was, in fact, one of her most frequent utterances. I heard her say it hundreds of times." |
"stop" (in response to one medical procedure being done on her) |
Terri's MediPlex records |
"ugh-hugh" (meaning yes) "ugh-ugh" (meaning no) "yea" "No" |
family members, and paralegal Tom Brodersen* 'yea' was a word she learned to speak in 2001. * |
After Judge Greer heard of Tom Brodersen |
This is the BEST of have seen on Terri. It gets to the heart of the matter. Terri is of no use to her husband and he wants to murder her through starvation. Her husband has no regard for God; only himself. It seems everyone wants to play god. He refuses to let God determine her fate. Her husband is a cold hearted monster. It IS her husband that should be on trial; not Terri.
.
Child of God...
We pray those judicial sinners...
Do not cause the hour of thy death...
Amen !!!
.
|
bttt
BTTT>
Who would have thought that food would be considered 'artificial life support'? It is not too absurd to consider the artificial life supports of environmental controls. France had that problem one summer when thousands died of heat. Every winter we hear of people freezing to death in their apartments, obviously too disabled to handle the environment on their own, their 'artificial environmental life support' was discontinued.
Terri ping! If anyone would like to be added to or removed from my Terri ping list, please let me know by FReepmail!
Someday soon, a tyrant like Greer will make a determination that the quality of life of those people is too low, and so they must be liquidated.
Thank you for posting an article that sweeps the struggle aside and bottom lines the tragic truth of this matter.
This is purely and simply, above all else, denying food and water in order to kill a very loved human being. It is MURDER by judicial decree.
I wonder, when a governor signs a stay in the last minutes before the execution of a felon, because perhaps new information has come forward or it is noticed that a past , relevant action was not thoroughly vetted within the courts, is this not the executive branch using a necessary power to override the court decision or death sentence?
And if it is, then why cannot Terri, who is a complete innocent and totally unable to speak for herself, enjoy the same benefit, especially and most urgently since HER DEATH SENTENCE is based 100% upon HEARSAY.
He, FELOS, was already acquainted with Michael at the time he worked to successfully redefine food and water....so he GOT THE LAW CHANGED so that Terri would fit the parameters of artificially being kept alive...SO THAT THEY COULD KILL HER.
And now...........this freak of a human being wails that the legislature is INTERFERING by possibly changing the law in favor of people like Terri....guess FELOS only wants it HIS WAY.
Tears...
There are psychopaths, such as serial killers, who truly enjoy the suffering of others and their power to kill them.
Did you know that George W. Greer calls himself "a conservative Republican" and enjoys the backing of the Pinellas and Pasco county Republican organizations? We surely need a two-party system. This part of FL is really a one-party enclave though most wear an "R" label.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.