Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi "Mildly Pro-Choice"
http://www.drudgereport.com ^ | 3-11-2005 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 03/11/2005 6:32:41 PM PST by Sola Veritas

Rice pointedly declined to rule out running for president in 2008 on Friday during an hour-long interview with reporters at WASHINGTON TIMES, top sources tell DRUDGE. Rice gave her most detailed explanation of a 'mildly pro-choice' stance on abortion, she would not want the government 'forcing its views' on abortion... She explained that she is libertarian on the issue, adding: 'I have been concerned about a government role'... Developing late Friday for Saturday cycles... MORE...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; brown; condirice; drudge; hateconditime; keylife; stevebrown; stevebrownetc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,521-1,539 next last
To: Righty_McRight
"It's not like a president can overturn Roe vs Wade."

Neither can a single Senator or Congressman, but his/her position on Abortion is a factor in my vote.

I will not vote for anyone who disavows the death of innocent life.

101 posted on 03/11/2005 6:57:17 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: sandbar

:-)


103 posted on 03/11/2005 6:58:15 PM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

The only concept to which abortion (or more appropriately stated, the ending of pregnancy) may be even considered a right for a woman is in regards to self-defense ... and that concept extends to ending a rape pregnancy or that of a minor child. BUT, and this the vital corollary, such ending of a pregnancy must be done earliest possible date in the lifetime already begun. [Donning my flame suit now ...]


104 posted on 03/11/2005 6:58:21 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

There are other issues you know. Would you vote for a pro-gay, anti-military, anti-american candidate that happened to be pro-life? If so, then you would vote for Harry Reid for President. One would hope that we are a big tent party to the extent that pro-life conservatives realize that not voting for the Republican nominee hands to Presidency back to the Michael Moore crowd. These are serious times, and Condi is the toughest potential President out there period. Sign that woman up!


105 posted on 03/11/2005 6:58:22 PM PST by darkmatter (Let them hate. As long as they fear. -Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long

>>>Hush! Just because YOU don't have any convictions doesn't mean no one else can!>>>

What good are you 'convictions' gonna do ya with a Clinton in office?


106 posted on 03/11/2005 6:58:50 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
There goes her chance of being nominated.

Hardly. "Mildly pro-choice" describes about 70-80% of Republicans. If you poll Republicans on whether or not abortion should be legal in the first trimester for rape and when the mother's life is threatened, you'll find the absolutists are in the minority.

And her stand on government intervention is the status quo before Roe v. Wade when the federal government took no stand on the issue leaving it up to the individual states to decide. Legal in California, illegal in Utah.

107 posted on 03/11/2005 6:58:57 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

Keep up your delusion...it fits you.


108 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:05 PM PST by ApesForEvolution (I just took a Muhammad and wiped my Jihadist with Mein Koran...come and get me nutbags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Peach

as a man and not nearly as fanatical as some on FR, I think exceptions in the case of rape, incest are justifiable, just like war is justifiable......I won't argue you the point much...seems like it is morally reasonable and I'll work it out in heaven if need be


109 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:11 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: AlGone2001
If she is on the ticket on '08, I'll either stay home or vote for the Constitution Party.

Now where have I seen that before? Oh, I remember! 2000 -- and it was Bush, not Condi.

110 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:30 PM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Me too. And I've been told my acceptance of the morning after pill is no less evil than being for partial birth abortion.

That kind of radical positioning of the pro-life movement is why partial birth abortion is still legal, IMO.


111 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:32 PM PST by Trinity_Tx (Since Oct 9, 2000...Trinity doesn't refer to a place... I'm from Dallas...Need a new nick, lol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

She's mildly pro-choice, I'm mildly against her nomination now.


112 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:49 PM PST by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas; et al
It is total ridiculous to be a one choice, one view voter.

I certainly would not vote for someone who was more for abortion, and not the one who is not as committed. I understand where she is coming from and I am not of her opinion, but.....I would vote for her.

The official teaching of the Catholic Church is to vote and to vote on the lesser of the two evils. I am not putting Dr. Rice in the lesser of the two evil category, just trying to explain a teaching.

She would be a marvelous person to consider for President, and someone of her background and stature could possibly bring about more laws to protect the unborn than has ever been able to have been done before.

I have stated in this forum previously, I am very pro-life, but I do not think we are going to get there in one big whack, it will take many steps, and mini victories in order to get there. Rome was not built in a day, these laws are going to have to be dealt with patiently, much to my sorrow.

But to turn on Dr. Rice, giving the real evil person the ability to win is beyond my comprehension.
113 posted on 03/11/2005 6:59:51 PM PST by rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
As I have told you repeatedly, the fact that you stalk me just to trash me is a sure sign I'm doing something right.

Stalk, stalk, stalk, stalk, stalk, stalk...like a record with a scratch on it...

114 posted on 03/11/2005 7:00:02 PM PST by Lurking2Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mellyK

So is wanting a girl and being pregnant with a boy. I know this is an incredibly emotional issue for you and for me. I simply cannot find justification to kill a human being just because it is small. A 2 year old is small and still developing. The product of rape is a terrible thing, but it is not common. I will think more on this subject, but I do not think this rare occurrance should penalize 45 million deaths which this country has inflicted on the unborn, nor should that hypothetical dictate the countries position on abortion as a nation.


115 posted on 03/11/2005 7:00:22 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long

Jerks don't usually last long around here.
How'd you pull it off?

Just asking.....


116 posted on 03/11/2005 7:00:22 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lurking2Long

"only interested in how her own life is impacted, not about the value of life itself..."

Oh please. Its 2010 and two SCOTUS slots are open. Who do you want to nominate replacements - Condi or Hillary?


117 posted on 03/11/2005 7:00:38 PM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution

You have NO idea that I'm a pro abortion advocate. None.

But you single issue voters are the most immature group of people I've ever heard in my life.

And let me say this, if you sit home and let a Democrat get in office, abortion will be the LAST thing you will have argued on this site convincingly. Because Democrats care NOTHING about national security. Nothing.


118 posted on 03/11/2005 7:00:44 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Rice is a bad choice because she probably couldn't beat Clinton. She has ever been elected to office and we have no idea where she stands on many issues. I have heard she is pro-abortion and supports affirmative action. If those are true I definitely won't support her. I like Rice but not as a presidential nominee.


119 posted on 03/11/2005 7:00:45 PM PST by ThermoNuclearWarrior (PRESSURE BUSH TO CLOSE THE BORDERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

Not many conservatives who care about this country.


120 posted on 03/11/2005 7:01:01 PM PST by Howlin (Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,521-1,539 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson