Posted on 03/11/2005 7:42:58 AM PST by RogerWilko
Two months after Sacramento County enacted one of the nation's most aggressive affordable housing policies, the Building Industry Association of Superior California filed Monday to scrap the plan, calling it an unfair and unnecessary tax on developers that would drive up housing prices. During the two years county officials spent drafting a plan to provide housing for the poor, building industry officials resisted the plan and tried to loosen its stringent requirements.
Affordability plan for low-income residents is called unfair tax that hurts others.
The building industry's suit filed in Sacramento Superior Court reiterates those same arguments.
"Is it fair to ask someone, because they are purchasing a home, to pay more so that someone else can buy the same home at a drastically reduced price just because they make less money?" asked Dennis Rogers, the association's senior vice president of governmental affairs and public policy. "We don't ask Raley's to sell their products at below cost and charge more to everyone else."
(Excerpt) Read more at 216.239.57.104 ...
A family of 3 with an annual income of $17,300 or less can qualify to buy a home for around $75,000 that will cost others that probably need an income of $80,000 to $100,000 per year to buy the same house, in the same neighborhood!
Yeah, that's really fair... You pay $300,000-400,000 for a home, while someone who won't even be able to come anywhere near what's needed to even upkeep the place gets to buy it for 1/4 of the price or less! Everyone else gets to pick up the slack on the lost income to the builders by paying more for their homes! Man, I sure love fairness!
People work for years to get into a decent neighborhood and now they just want to practically give homes away to people that can't afford them in the first place. I sure hope the builders win this suit... Socialism is SUCH a great thing!
Hey... Wait a minute... I've got an idea! My wife an I will quit our jobs, get part-time minimum wage jobs, qualify for a new $75,000 home, then get re-employed after we secure the home! YEAH!!
Then we'll have a $300-400,000 home with small house payments and low property tax because of Prop 13 (Can't raise your property tax more than 2% a year from purchase price!)
I knew their had to be a silver lining to this!
Here's another article on it:
This happened to us many years ago. The people who moved to their "affordable" houses never took care of them like the rest of the neighborhood (uncut grass, broke down cars etc.) Glad we got out of there when we did.
How in the world it is constitutional is beyond me.
Didn't you know that owning a home is a Constitutional right? (just like healthcare). *snicker*
Not yet, not yet.
This same dilemma was struck down in Arlington Co. Va. It was ruled unconstitutional to require developers to provide low-income housing in a very expensive county. If you can't afford an area, better look elsewhere for a home. Hell, just because I want to live in Beverly Hills doesn't mean I'm entitled to!
If this goes thru, I'd definitely make sure the neighborhood I was buying into didn't have any of this fair housing going on! Thank goodness our neighborhood is already completed with all the homes sold!
Someone needs to post these supervisor's addresses. If I were a developer, I'd give each one a crackhouse for a neighbor.
It goes well beyond the price of the home. It is doubtful that the poor will be expected to pay the same property tax rate, even though they have the same house as a middle class owner. Since the poor will be sending their kids to the schools, using the highways, depending on the fire and police services, I expect that gov't costs will rise rather sharply. This will neccessitate a rise in taxes. Paid by who? The middle class homeowner. A Liberal's Wet Dream!!!
I wonder if these same "low income" families can afford the property taxes?
Heck, why not just give everyone a Mercedes Benz or BMW and raise the minimum wage to $30 per hour!
I'd love to hear the screaming from these supervisors if one of these "fair" homes were built right next door to them! I'm sure they'd be ALL for it! Uh huh... DEFINITELY!!
The Courts have run amok!
National Headline: Wal-Mart will be the first retailer required to sell goods under the government's new "social justice in retailing" policy. Low-income customers can receive their SJ discount by checking out through specially marked register lines.
I lived in an area where the projects were torn down and Section 8 Housing was mandated. These morons devalued property and made neighborhoods worse.
Also, your taxes can't be raised more than 2% a year, I believe, because of Prop 13. Other people moving into the same neighborhood would have to pay $300-400,000 for the same home and get property taxes of $3000-4000 a year!
[Hell, just because I want to live in Beverly Hills doesn't mean I'm entitled to!]
You WANT to live in Beverly Hills?
The net result: $20,000 increase in the cost of each house to pay an upfront tax to the city. No tax increase required. You just lay out some planning rules and extort the money. That is government California-style.
DAMN, now I have to clean my keyboard off from laughing so hard!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.