Skip to comments.
Judge says DCF can't intervene in Terri Schiavo case
Associated Press ^
| March 10, 2005
| Mitch Stacy
Posted on 03/10/2005 12:22:56 PM PST by amdgmary
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 641-658 next last
Comment #341 Removed by Moderator
To: Saundra Duffy
Actually # 1 would be the action in the end that jeb bush takes is because to me he is a gutless coward being usurped by a worthless low on the rung probate judge a weasal of a lowlife euthanasia lawyer with a agenda and a psychological liar of a husband that justs wants to cover his tracks in long litany of deceit and lies and fraud for things that he is directly RESPONSIBLE FOR.
He is the cause of his wife's injuries and he is responsible for the despicable exploitation of his wife' s trust fund.
OTHER WISE JEB SHOULD CALL HIS LOUDMOUTH BROTHER IN WASHINGTON AND ASK FOR ASSISTANCE FROM THE US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND LAUNCH A CRIMINIAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEALINGS OF MIKE SCHIAVO GEORGE GREER AND GEORGE GREER.
GEORGE HAS TO SHUT THIS DOWN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
AFTER ALL GEORGE BUSH IS APPEALING THE LEGALIZATION OF EUTHANASIA IN OREGON IN THE SUPREME COURT.
HE OUGHT TO BE INVOLVED IN THIS TOO IS BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT WANT EUTHANASIA LEGALIZED IN THE UNITED STATES.
OTHERWISE EVEN GEORGE WOULD BE JUST AS MUCH A SPINELESS COWARD LIKE HIS BROTHER JEB.
FRANKLY I NEVER MET A POLITICIAN OF ANY POLITICAL LEANINGS OF ANY TYPE THAT I DID NOT HAVE THE UPMOST CONTEMPT FOR AND ALL OF THEM ARE CORRUPT TO THE BONE.
Please i don't want to hear a coward's excuse anymore for not wanting to get involved by coming up with some pie in the sky bogus concept they call the separation of powers.
To: Heisenberg
That's the best you could do? pitiful!
You left out the Heisenberg Certainty Principle...
It is a Certainty that YOUR quality of life is of low value and beyond repair.
So let's lock YOU in a room and remove YOUR nutrition and hydration too.
Comment #344 Removed by Moderator
To: Annie03
As for Schiavo, he has stated he had great hope that she would recover in the first few years. He got the money and a few weeks later stopped all therapy and put a DNR in her chart. And if you believe Schiavo, I've got a bridge for sale.
345
posted on
03/10/2005 7:50:04 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Life support. canned, frozen or fresh, it's good for you!)
To: Heisenberg
As we have discussed before, the ends doesn't justify the means. I have spent hours and hours researching the facts, and none point to most of the wild speculation. Tho I *wish* Michael would just give Terri to her parents, the case has been conducted within the law. Because I have been a "Save Terri" as well, it was quite a difficult chore to face facts.
FReegards
346
posted on
03/10/2005 7:51:02 PM PST
by
Annie03
To: Annie03
The DCA ruled that the judge could make a finding in light of conflicting evidence, as to the ward's unwritten wishes. A court advising another court that they don't have to follow the law. This from the state that tried to give us Al Gore by judicial ruling.
347
posted on
03/10/2005 7:52:34 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Life support. canned, frozen or fresh, it's good for you!)
To: DJ MacWoW
ROFLLLLLLL!!!
ROFLLLLLLLL!!!!
I LOVE IT!
SPOT ON!
348
posted on
03/10/2005 7:55:13 PM PST
by
eeevil conservative
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke)
To: Heisenberg
It has all to do with the power of the judiciary over matters of life and death. The court can let in any evidence, witnesses or motions it feels it needs to move the case to the conclusion it wants. I recognize the differences between criminal and civil and Federal law and Florida law. The comparison was the extent the court will go to protect the rights and preserve the life of a murderer and not display the same scruples for this vulnerable lady who has received a death penalty from a civil court. She is being denied an unalienable right, the right to life, and the protection of that right should be the same in any court, state or federal.
To: PatriotGirl827
> Glenn Beck has covered this
Glenn has spent a great deal of time covering Terri's fight, including providing a lot of air time for her parents to present her case. Fox news has provided a lot more coverage than the rest of the msm combined.
350
posted on
03/10/2005 7:57:29 PM PST
by
ADemocratNoMore
(Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
To: FL_engineer
;=] I was wondering if he was Schrodiner's Cat.
351
posted on
03/10/2005 7:57:57 PM PST
by
pc93
(http://www.blogsforterri.com)
To: eeevil conservative
No, I meant the kind of statements my husband has made to me. I meant my father, who I knew my whole life, and knew he would be mortified at having someone else bathe him and change his diapers. But that's how his life ended up, until he died in hospice shortly after refusing food. Like that.
352
posted on
03/10/2005 7:58:07 PM PST
by
Annie03
To: FL_engineer; Heisenberg
Just because he was in favor of Terri living before he was agains her living.... Well, it is a man's right to choose, or something like that.
I would like to teach him this little ditty:
Beware
those who
know not
and who
know not
that they
know not.
And remind him of this again:
353
posted on
03/10/2005 7:58:28 PM PST
by
8mmMauser
(www.ChristtheKingMaine.com)
To: amdgmary
"appears to be brought for the purpose of circumventing the court's final judgment ... in violation of the separation of powers doctrine." He got PART of that right...seperation of powers means that the Judicial system is NOT the means of last resort. If the Legislature or Executive of a particular state decides that a judges ruling is in violation of the Constitution they have an obligation to overrule it by passing a new law, or refusing to enforce the ruling, respectively.
To: Dog Gone
Hey----GOOD IDEA......how about the ROOT of your name? That is a GREAT IDEA! Wanna find it?
355
posted on
03/10/2005 7:59:23 PM PST
by
Republic
(Will michael shiavo and his concubine and children now preside over the murder of Terri?)
To: eeevil conservative
Please link the transcripts. Thanks
356
posted on
03/10/2005 8:00:12 PM PST
by
Annie03
To: Dog Gone
None of us are there in her room. We're mostly hearing arguments from hired guns, or those with an agenda far bigger than Terri, on both sides of the fence. Of that, I have little doubt.hired guns? The attorney? The priest? The nurses? Who are the hired guns on the other side that say Terri is PVS AND HAVE ACTUALLY SEEN HER?
357
posted on
03/10/2005 8:00:23 PM PST
by
eccentric
(a.k.a. baldwidow)
To: Annie03
What ever you MEANT-- You made my case...
Thank you...
358
posted on
03/10/2005 8:00:53 PM PST
by
eeevil conservative
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke)
To: Annie03
the case has been conducted within the law. You keep saying this. Do you know anything about guardianship laws in Fla? When Schiavo was given guardianship, he was supposed to take a course to be taught proper proceedure. He never did. If you don't take the course, you are replaced. He never was. Every 6 months, you have to file papers regarding care such as normal tests, dental care etc. He hasn't filed them in years.
359
posted on
03/10/2005 8:01:19 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Life support. canned, frozen or fresh, it's good for you!)
To: DJ MacWoW
NO, DCA said he was within the law.
360
posted on
03/10/2005 8:01:40 PM PST
by
Annie03
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 641-658 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson