[Mongeaux]

Succinctly put. I have no problem with religions that don't own waterslides, require their members to surgically remove genitalia or crash airplanes into things. But using science to validate Religious Mythology is just SILLY!

[tfecw]

agreed. I always wondered when people tried to mix faith with fact. I thought the whole point in faith was...uhh you had to have faith.

[DannyTN]

"I have no problem with religions that don't own waterslides, require their members to surgically remove genitalia or crash airplanes into things. But using science to validate Religious Mythology is just SILLY!"

So your position is it doesn't matter how ridiculous or murderous a religion is in your book it's ok with you.

The only time you take offense with religion is when they claim that science actually supports their scriptures.

Do I have that right?

[GeekDejure]

But using science to validate Religious Mythology is just SILLY!

======

Psssssst.... Islamofascists evolved from fruit flies !!! ;-))