So your position is it doesn't matter how ridiculous or murderous a religion is in your book it's ok with you.
The only time you take offense with religion is when they claim that science actually supports their scriptures.
Do I have that right?
"So your position is it doesn't matter how ridiculous or murderous a religion is in your book it's ok with you.
The only time you take offense with religion is when they claim that science actually supports their scriptures.
Do I have that right?"
Sorry, no Danny you got it backwards. The wacky violent religions I have a problem with. That was what I meant when I said:
"I have no problem with religions that don't own waterslides, require their members to surgically remove genitalia or crash airplanes into things. But using science to validate Religious Mythology is just SILLY!"
The key word there was "DON'T", however I am addicted to complex grammatical constructions so I don't blame you for getting it confused.