Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Dodge Thomas

three consecutive days pushes that above .1.
---

k. well, no one is arguing for three days of driving and I doubt any Trucker would actually do that. I'll have to think about such an 'extreme case' as the one you describe. Perhaps legislation in such a situation is warrented. I would think that a jury would prob find such a trucker guilty of involuntary manslaughter if they killed someone. or?

Also keep in mind cell phone use puts you almost at somewhere around .05-.08 (I think, not positive on this statistic)

I think a good portion of drunk driving deaths are caused by 'reckless drunks' who speed. (not to minimize drunk driving, just to put in context some of these other impairments)


81 posted on 03/09/2005 8:52:14 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/foundingoftheunitedstates.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: traviskicks
Also keep in mind cell phone use puts you almost at somewhere around .05-.08 (I think, not positive on this statistic)

Interesting comparison - up to a point. Seem to me the differences are:

- Cell phone impairment is usually intermittent, the effects of sleep deprecation are continuous and cumulative.

- Cell phone usage can be voluntarily discontinued anytime you believe it's hazardous - there are many times I just don't answer when driving, or when I delay making a call.

Discontinuing consciousness while diving, OTOH, is generally inventory, and generally has immediate serious consequences.
102 posted on 03/09/2005 9:15:26 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson