Posted on 03/09/2005 7:44:05 AM PST by TXBSAFH
three consecutive days pushes that above .1.
---
k. well, no one is arguing for three days of driving and I doubt any Trucker would actually do that. I'll have to think about such an 'extreme case' as the one you describe. Perhaps legislation in such a situation is warrented. I would think that a jury would prob find such a trucker guilty of involuntary manslaughter if they killed someone. or?
Also keep in mind cell phone use puts you almost at somewhere around .05-.08 (I think, not positive on this statistic)
I think a good portion of drunk driving deaths are caused by 'reckless drunks' who speed. (not to minimize drunk driving, just to put in context some of these other impairments)
Bears repeating. People just don't understand basic physics. The whole car is a "crumple zone" if there is enough force involved, and then the jerks blame the trucker.
You yourself that it is AMAZING. He is an anomaly, not the norm.
aahh, poor pony!
You yourself admit that it is AMAZING. He is an anomaly, not the norm.
Good, you have one week down. Now go out and do this for the next 20 years and get back to us with a report on how easy it actually is.
Thanks, we'll be here waiting.
Just think about Japan in the 1930's.
This change from 14 to 16 hours just changes the mandatory rest period from 10 to 8 hours.
Sorry, shut off </i> italics.
All of the drivers in my family tell me that they can recogize people who know trucking by the way we drive around trucks.
Current rules limit drivers' workdays to 14 hours, with only 11 consecutive hours of driving allowed, union leaders and safety advocates say. That gives truckers three hours to eat, rest or load and unload their trucks.
Nothing about 'consecutive hours of driving allowed' under the new proposal in the article (other than 2 hours unpaid).
That is an interesting take on it, but consider this: Should companies be permitted to offer contracts which stipulate that the driver drive drunk? Sure, if that happened you could pin it all on the drivers, they weren't forced to take the contract... but highway deaths would skyrocket, and I, for one, wouldn't do any driving.
"16 hour days- big whoop. I did that in college and I'm certainly capable of it now"
Have you ever driven a truck for sixteen hours? Do you do manual labor or are you one of those armchair commandos who likes to downplay the work of others?
How rude. You have no CLUE !
"If a trucker is willing to work 36 hours and Wall-Mart is willing to pay them for it, then what is the problem?"
The problem is someone going to sleep at the wheel and taking out an SUV load of soccer mommies.
That's odd, because it is in the trucking co's best interest to have safe drivers.
A trucking co that employs bad drivers will soon be out of business.
The fool nearly got his front clip clipped. And I live in an area where people should know better.
We were taught as kids to stay out of the blind spots, signal when the truck is past, never cut a truck off, and how the trailer cuts corners even if the tires don't.
Funny, but you can usually tell who rides motorcycles by the way they act around bikes, too.
Just last week a coke delivery truck changed lanes, the problem was I was already there. Had to slam on the brakes and swerve to avoid being run over.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.