Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retailers want 16-hour trucker workday (Walmart)
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/08/trucker.rules.ap/index.html ^ | 3-9-05

Posted on 03/09/2005 7:44:05 AM PST by TXBSAFH

Critics: 'Sweatshop-on-wheels amendment' Tuesday, March 8, 2005 Posted: 7:35 PM EST (0035 GMT) What's this? MyCashNow - $100 - $1,000 Overnight Payday Loan Cash goes in your account overnight. Very low fees. Fast decisions.... www.mycashnow.com Mortgage Rates Hit Record Lows Get $150,000 loan for $625 per month. Refinance while rates are low. www.lowermybills.com Compare Mortgage Offers Up to four free mortgage, refinance or home equity offers - one easy form. www.nextag.com LendingTree.com - Official Site Lendingtree - Find a mortgage, refinance, home equity or auto loan now. Receive... www.lendingtree.com YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated Retail Transportation or Create your own Manage alerts | What is this? WASHINGTON (AP) -- Wal-Mart and other retailers are lobbying Congress to extend the workday for truckers to 16 hours, something labor unions and safety advocates say would make roadways more dangerous for all drivers. Rep. John Boozman, an Arkansas Republican whose district includes Wal-Mart's headquarters in Bentonville, is sponsoring a bill that would allow a 16-hour workday as long as the trucker took an unpaid two-hour break. The proposal is expected to be offered as an amendment during debate over the highway spending bill on Wednesday. "Truckers are pushing harder than ever to make their runs within the mandated timeframe," Boozman said. "Optional rest breaks will reduce driver layovers and improve both safety and efficiency."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: freight; nafta; sweatshops; transportation; truckin; trucking; walmart; wto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-202 next last
To: dmz

I guess my point - that seems to be escaping most- is that people are capable of working long hours. And it should be up to them to decide.

What about farmers who work in the fields for hours upon end? or people who work in factories doing dangerous work for long hours?

It's not like this is the first time since the dawn of time that people have worked long hours.

There are also safety requirements that truckers must adhere to in order to keep their job. I would be willing to put trucker driving records up against any slice of the general population, and bet you that the average yahoo on the road, maybe doing a 15 minute drive, is way more dangerous than truckers.


61 posted on 03/09/2005 8:26:00 AM PST by RushCrush (I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

And the counterpoint that you appear to be missing is that there is a qualitative difference between a warehouse guy packing boxes for shipment, or a farmer in the field, or the CEO of a company, working 16 hours a day and somebody driving a truck 16 hours a day.



62 posted on 03/09/2005 8:31:27 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: dmz

WEll that is obviously true.

There are plenty of dangerous jobs out there- is truck driving the most dangerous? I doubt it.

Are these jobs performed for long hours? probably.

Do we need more restrictive legislation on any portion of our lives? NO


63 posted on 03/09/2005 8:32:56 AM PST by RushCrush (I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dmz

You say "I am firing you as my customer and I am not putting any of your freight on my truck anymore."


64 posted on 03/09/2005 8:35:12 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

Yeah, except the average yahoo is not driving 50 tons of truck and trailer that will squash other vehicles like bugs if he loses control of it.


65 posted on 03/09/2005 8:37:54 AM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

A lot of farmers are injured or die in their fields and a lot of people are injured at work or die on their way home from a 12 to 16 hour day.

You're right about truck drivers being safer than the average driver but pushing them harder isn't going to do much for that safety. There is a reason P.A.T.T. (parents against tired truckers) reversed their attacks on drivers. They realized that no driver wanted to get themselves killed or wanted to kill someone else. They recognized that it was primarilly the fault of the companies that push drivers too hard.


http://www.patt.org/


66 posted on 03/09/2005 8:38:13 AM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
Walmart may have some hourly paid, but they also contract heavily with independents. A friend of mine ran a small trucking company, and contracted with Walmart. They were tough to contract with. Cell phone wired into the truck and GPS. Walmart gave you the route and a window of arrival. You were contacted by Big Brother if you went more than ten miles off designated route, or arrived early or late. They didn't want you there early because that meant you'd been speeding.
67 posted on 03/09/2005 8:40:04 AM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All
Just for point of reference:
The hours of service rules are:

11 hours allowable driving in a day.
10 hours off after completion of 11 driving hours.
70 hours maximum driving in an 8 day period.

Now the 16 hour workday is so that a shipper or reciever does
not take up 8 hours of a workday (unpaid) unloading or
loading a truck, thus leaving the truck driver with six hours to work
during his workday. Can't stop for lunch, a nap, etc.

This propasal is purely to give a bigger window for the truck drivers to
complete there 10 or 11 hour days.

68 posted on 03/09/2005 8:41:29 AM PST by Mensius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

My mother drives for Shneider National on a Wal Mart contract and says it's the worst she's ever done. She's home almost 3 whole days of every month to boot!


69 posted on 03/09/2005 8:43:02 AM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
I have a radical idea. Why don't we allow two individuals to voluntarily contract with each other without governmental interference.

Public safety issue - GOGGLE "sleep deprivation driving" - for example testing suggests that driving after being awake for 17-19 hours on a *single day* produces impairment equivalent to a BAL of .05, three consecutive days pushes that above .1.

So in terms of safety implications, this is a plan to put drunks behind the wheels of large trucks.

You will certainly find individuals who believe they can drive accident free under such conditions - and perhaps some can.

But from a public safety perspective that's like letting someone drive after 6 beers because "they can handle it" - by the time we find out if it their judgment was accurate or not, it's too late to bring back someone who was killed because a sleep deprived or intoxicated driver misjudged their own ability.
70 posted on 03/09/2005 8:44:37 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
I have a radical idea. Why don't we allow two individuals to voluntarily contract with each other without governmental interference.

Public safety issue - GOGGLE "sleep deprivation driving" - for example testing suggests that driving after being awake for 17-19 hours on a *single day* produces impairment equivalent to a BAL of .05, three consecutive days pushes that above .1.

So in terms of safety implications, this is a plan to put drunks behind the wheels of large trucks.

You will certainly find individuals who believe they can drive accident free under such conditions - and perhaps some can.

But from a public safety perspective that's like letting someone drive after 6 beers because "they can handle it" - by the time we find out if it their judgment was accurate or not, it's too late to bring back someone who was killed because a sleep deprived or intoxicated driver misjudged their own ability.
71 posted on 03/09/2005 8:44:42 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kretek; Rutles4Ever; TXBSAFH; A. Pole; mvpel; Bikers4Bush; meatloaf; -YYZ-; doc30

The problem is, the deaths and destruction caused by the unsafe working conditions of an overtired or asleep driver behind the wheel of a multiton truck.
---

This is a completely seperate issue. If a trucker drinks while driving who is culpable? If a trucker puts others at risk with irresponsible behavior, such as trying to stay up for 3 days strait then the trucker is criminally liable and his case will then be judged by the courts. The role of the person on the other end of the contract is meaningless.

All I know is that, like all needless, pointless and hurtful regulations imposed by government, the current rules are routinely flaunted by many, if not most, current truck drivers.

I used to routinly drive from Tallahssee Fl to West Chester Pennsylvania, a 20 hour drive in my CRX, by myself and without a radio. Should I be thrown in Jail?

Irregardless, the whole point is that the criminal issue of endagering other drivers needs to be legally seperate from a company offering such contracts such as Wall-Mart.

To not do so is opening up the gates to Tyranny and inhibiting freedom, liberty, and degrading morality, by the passing of endless emotional knee jerk regulations and rules until all enterprise and inovation has been stiffled by the 'nanny state'.

And yeah, private roads would solve this debate. But thats another issue. :)


72 posted on 03/09/2005 8:45:03 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/foundingoftheunitedstates.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

The qualitative difference is that truckers are performing their jobs on public roads. Farmers and factory workers and CEO's aren't.

It's that public road thing that gives the public a vested interest in the working conditions. If they were driving on their own private roads it wouldn't matter.


73 posted on 03/09/2005 8:45:14 AM PST by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

"Chairman Mao's General Store"

LOL! Great name for the Great Wall Mart! :)

Good post, BTW!


74 posted on 03/09/2005 8:47:12 AM PST by EagleMamaMT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dead

I'll be cool with it just as soon they install a dead-man pedal in every rig.


75 posted on 03/09/2005 8:47:23 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mensius

Now the 16 hour workday is so that a shipper or reciever does not take up 8 hours of a workday (unpaid) unloading or loading a truck, thus leaving the truck driver with six hours to work during his workday. Can't stop for lunch, a nap, etc.

This propasal is purely to give a bigger window for the truck drivers to complete there 10 or 11 hour days.

Here's the problem: if the driver has been awake for those eight hours while they load or unload the truck, they're still not as alert as they could be. I have no problem with 11 hours allowable driving, just so long as there's the mandatory rest period immediately before it!

76 posted on 03/09/2005 8:47:48 AM PST by Kretek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Dead horse: being kicked.


77 posted on 03/09/2005 8:47:55 AM PST by RushCrush (I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks
If a trucker is willing to work 16 hours and Wall-Mart is willing to pay them for it, then what is the problem?

The problem is it's not safe:

In 2001, 429,000 large trucks (gross vehicle weight rating greater than 10,000 lbs.) were involved in traffic crashes in the United States: 4,793 were involved in fatal crashes. A total of 5,082 people died (12 percent of all the traffic fatalities reported in 2001) and an additional 131,000 were injured in those crashes.

In 2000, large trucks accounted for 4 percent of all registered vehicles and 7 percent of total vehicle miles traveled (2001 registered vehicle and vehicle miles traveled data not available). In 2001, large trucks accounted for 8 percent of all vehicles involved in fatal crashes and 4 percent of all vehicles involved in injury and property-damage-only crashes.

The 1998 NHTSA data also demonstrate that:

Large trucks accounted for 3% of all registered vehicles, 9% of all vehicles involved in fatal crashes, and were involved in 13% of all passenger vehicle occupant deaths.

More than one out of every five passenger vehicle occupant deaths was the result of a multi- vehicle collision in which a large truck was involved.

Of the 5,374 fatalities in collisions involving large trucks 86% were occupants of other vehicles, and non-occupants.

Of the 126,000 injuries in crashes involving large trucks 78% were occupants of other vehicles, and non-occupants.

78 posted on 03/09/2005 8:48:49 AM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead

having once been hit by a semi trucker who was on speed
trying to stay awake, I'd say this is a bad idea.


79 posted on 03/09/2005 8:49:44 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Keep capitol punishment safe,legal , and rare...shoot the perp in the head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

When I was a kid, one of my uncles was a trucker, and it was the epitome of freedom. Today, it's got all the drawbacks of a desk job with a boss looking over your shoulder.


80 posted on 03/09/2005 8:50:08 AM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson