One more post. The anthropologists tell the geologists how old they think the fossils are, so the geologists date the layers accordingly. Then the geologists tell the anthropologists how old that layer is when new fossils are found. The biggest circle jerk ever.
You should have stopped while you were behind.
The anthropologists tell the geologists how old they think the fossils are, so the geologists date the layers accordingly.
You're lying. Please explain why, and try to justify your actions. We'll wait.
Actually, the labs that perform radiometric dating on samples which are sent to them aren't "told" anything about the "expected" age of the samples. They just process the samples and read out the results which the machines produce based on the measured isotope ratios, then mail the results back to the folks who submitted the samples.
You clearly have never actually done any dating of samples (either as a submitter or as an analayst), but I note that this doesn't stop you from shooting your mouth off as if you actually knew what you were talking about, even though you do not.
That's typical for creationists, though, who show all the humility of gradeschoolers lecturing quantum physicists.
Then the geologists tell the anthropologists how old that layer is when new fossils are found.
Wrong again. From where did you gain your erroneous "knowledge" of science? Let me guess -- creationist pamphlets?
The biggest circle jerk ever.
You appear to be doing more of that sort of activity than those whom you accuse.
Why don't you go off and actually learn some real science before you try again?