[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

.

And yet,

...Longtime LIBERAL Los Angeles Times Media Critic DAVID SHAW still tells us that...

...RATHER's work 'Shoddy, Slipshod' not LIBERAL..?

.

[highlander_UW]

Bloggers and columnists cited his run-ins with Republican presidents as evidence of his political agenda"..

I don't mind that he had run ins with Republican presidents. What I mind is he didn't equally have run ins with Democrat presidents...thus showing his bias. No politician should get a free pass from the press regardless of party affiliation. Rather, on the other hand is a hack.

[SMARTY]

'Shoddy, Slipshod' not LIBERAL..?

I thought Shoddy and Slipshod WAS Liberal. What's the difference? Did you ever hear a Liberal candidate whose thinking and ideas were NOT shoddy, slipshod and well....you know?

[lady lawyer]

Well, then how come his shoddy, slipshod mistakes always end up hurting conservatives -- since the very beginning? Just a coincidence?

[Brilliant]

"shoddy and slipshod," meaning "negligent", as opposed to "liberal," meaning "deliberately deceptive."

[shekkian]

.."From here on out, RATHER's toughest job might be convincing conservative critics that he's not a LIBERALLY BIASED JOURNALIST.

Yeah, okay Danny Boy. We read you loud and clear.

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

DAVID SHAW: RATHER's work 'Shoddy, Slipshod' not LIBERAL..?

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1227809/posts

.

[hsalaw]

"I think Dan's great strength is also his weakness," Schieffer said. "He was willing to go anywhere, anytime, to cover a story. I think Dan's downfall is that CBS expected too much of him."

Nice try. However, Rather's downfall was that he was a lying leftist who got caught.

[ChadGore]

LOOSERS:

[N. Theknow]

And so the Dan Rather version of the "I am not a crook tour" continues.

And somewhere in the great beyond, Richard Nixon is laughing his butt off.