Posted on 03/06/2005 8:39:44 PM PST by CHARLITE
On February 24th, a few days before a Florida judge issued Terri Schiavo a stay of execution until the 18th of March, I wrote for the first time on a subject I admittedly knew little about in a piece titled Okay
Ill talk About Terri Schiavo
Once!
As I stated in that piece, I was writing in response to reader mail asking me to take a position on a national debate that I had spent little time researching. Both before and since, I have been inundated with mail from folks on both sides of the debate, most of whom, knew little more about the matter, many of whom knew even less than I did.
The purpose of my piece was to first flush out the real facts for my own benefit, second point out how little people knew about the topic despite their emotionally charged rantings, and last to point out the short comings of our judiciary process in such a matter.
I have been called about every name under the sun for appearing to not take a side in that article, yet I did take a side, the only side I could take, Terris side. Not her husbands side, not her parents side, though I stated clearly that I related to their position best, not the courts side as they had failed the family miserably and not the peoples side, but Terris side
A dear writer friend, Joan Swirsky wrote probably the best piece I have read on the topic in her article Why Terri (and All Compromised Children) Should Live , in which she so eloquently places the debate on the proper footing.
I have also since received and reviewed the full medical report ordered by the court, issued by Dr. Jay Wolfson, in which he states that Terri is for all practical purposes, unable to sustain life on her own.
Not being a doctor myself, I asked a medical professional in whom I have great trust, to review the file and provide an open unbiased medical opinion of that report, regarding Terris current condition only. In short, that opinion states that Terris life is only threatened by her inability to swallow food orally, therefore requiring a feeding tube, not life support in traditional terms.
This goes to the heart of one of the statements I made in my first piece. We are not talking about unplugging Terri from artificial life support here but rather denying her the same nourishment necessary to sustain any of our lives
Do you have any idea how many people in this country require a feeding tube for one reason or another? Many of them otherwise, very healthy. Unable to take nourishment orally, is this the factor for deciding who should or should not live now?
Then I have received a mountain of documentation concerning how Terri may have actually entered her current condition, and it appears that certain state agencies in Florida have some 30 pieces of evidence now being entered into the court proceedings, questioning the quality of her husbands treatment of her and care, before, during and since her collapse some 14 years ago
Then there is the issue of husband Michael Schiavo, who has long since attempted to move on with his life, Terri clearly having already outlived her usefulness in his world.
But as so eloquently stated by Joan Swirsky, later confirmed in medical terms by the physicians I asked to review Terris file, Terris life still has great value to others in this world, her parents and many of us who believe life in all forms has value, great value.
In short, the more I learned about this case, the more amazed I became that there even was a case. That any court would even consider denying Terri simple basic nourishment, for any reason, regardless of her husbands motives
It became very clear to me that we are not talking about euthanasia, assisted death by medical procedure. It became clear that we are not even talking about letting God decide her fate by unplugging her from life support keeping her heart pumping, her lungs breathing and her kidneys functioning
We are talking about murder by starvation, plain and simple. Terris husband no longer has any use for Terri. She is no longer the young vibrant carefree model he once pledged his life to. He has found another to fill that void in his life and Terri is standing in his way of personal happiness, so in his mind, it is time for her to die.
Meanwhile, Terris life remains of great value to those who have loved her since birth, those who never loved her for her outward beauty, her ability to cook and clean, to perform the expected duties of a wife. Those who simply loved her for who she was, their daughter, their friend, loved her for who she still is today in their hearts and minds.
I have now seen enough of the allegations concerning the husbands questionable behavior throughout this affair. I have seen the medical report ordered by the court, and the review by independent physicians I trust personally.
This matter could not possibly be any more cut and dried than it is To remove Terris feeding tube is no different than denying a plate of food to millions sitting in nursing homes across this country, just because they are physically unable to pick up a fork or spoon and feed themselves or unable to swallow
My father has Alzheimers and while he remains able to feed himself today, there well may come a day when he is not able to anymore. If and when that day comes, I will happily help him eat When he no longer knows my name or my face, I will remind him daily. When he is no longer able to manage even restroom visits, I will gladly manage them for him, as he managed mine before I learned to manage them myself
This is all a part of life the caring for each other, those who represent great value in our lives.
To deny Terris parents the chance to care for her on the basis that her husband no longer has a use for her should not be a debate, it should be a crime
This matter is just that simple I stand for Terri, who still has great value in this world, who only requires love and care and basic nourishment to sustain life all the same things you and I require I fear what our society has become if we allow her to be starved to death Who will be next?
At the end of the day, it seems to me that every life is precious to someone and it should be. We must respect every life, no matter how imperfect, or we will risk respecting none Some things can be subjective The value of life is not one of them!
About the Writer: J. B. Williams notes that he is a business man, husband, father, and a writer. His website is at http://www.jb-williams.com. J. B. receives e-mail at
How very well put. Murder is murder for whatever reason. We should not have the legal system furthering murder.
It seems that Terri has a VERY strong will to live...and besides, shouldn't it be Terri's parents to decide what happens? she is THEIR daughter! that fruitcake of a husband shouldn't have anything to do with it at all.
And besides, Terri is an absolute sweetheart (I say that even though I personally don't know her too well)
What a beautiful statement. It cuts so clearly and cleanly to the core of the matter. It expresses in such simple terms the very feelings that all of us have tried to express so often in our own clumsy way. Mr. Williams has touched on the very heartbeat of the situation and summed it up in a very human way. Should be read by all...
Ping
Terri ping! If anyone would like to be added to or removed from my Terri ping list, please let me know by FReepmail!
A very moving article, sweet and to the point.
"To deny Terris parents the chance to care for her on the basis that her husband no longer has a use for her should not be a debate, it should be a crime
"
I agree 100%. How very sad this is for all who love Terri. We would not be debating this and Terri would be taken care of by her wonderful loving parents if it was not for her evil husband. I say string him up and hang the bastard. What a joke he is and I take comfort in knowing that some day he will be held accountable in front of God for his actions.
I like that. Besides the good graphic that it is, I like the way you did it. Must be on a clear .gif. Very nice.
You're a genius...I bow before you! :o)
Thank you for posting this, Charlite, and thanks for the ping, tertiary!
The opinion still stinks and is denying Terri basic human rights.
" Unable to take nourishment orally, is this the factor for deciding who should or should not live now? "
Terri cannot get food to her stomach without assistance-like tens of thousands of stroke patients and those with spinal cord injuries-like the late Christopher Reeve.
Why even infants need help getting food to their stomachs.
The only difference is that the rest of the nourishment impaired have family members who are trying to help them, not snuff them.
I don't think that anyone can watch Terri's videos and listen to her laugh and NOT fall in love with her!!!!!!!!( except Michael!!!!)
ping captaincar
you need to send this graphic to every member of the legislature!! That is very effective!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.