|
Posted on 03/06/2005 5:24:41 PM PST by HAL9000
Actually we could do without both of those hoseheads, but the other one keeps finding cameras stateside.
|
It may be unsafe to go there. Go, Hillary, go.
Gosh, I hope North Korea keeps all 5 of them. Let them go!
LOL. So many Freepers think alike... ;)
I wonder if she'll take her pet dog, Jack Reed, with her?
What else is a skank, soon to be Presidential candidate, suppose to do?
The Red Queen returns home to receive further orders.
That was my very first thought also. Surely Kim Jong's people have watched the Iraqi news and have caught onto hostage-taking. But we don't negotiate, do we? (evil smile)
That's it, she's reminding me of kerry in that they seem to forget GWB is the President. Hellary just finished a faux pas in Iraq, shudder to think what stupid remark she might make in North Korea.
And her husband Damien recently irked China with his visit to Taiwan. With these two cavorting around the world America is bound to be the worse for it. Damn, they just don't seem to go away, 13 years of the Clintons is sickening. Arrrghhh.
They're definitely sending the wrong person to unfreeze something.
TITLE 18 - PART I - CHAPTER 45 - § 953
§ 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
I am not a lawyer, but I seem to remember that the Logan Act has been brought up before when various members of the legislative bodies have visited hostile governments for unofficial negotiations without seeking approval from the executive. However, I don't believe that there has ever been a prosecution of a member of congress for an alleged violation, just discussion of it.
She's just going to keep Il from being so ronery. Maybe she'll give him a hootchie-kootchie dance like Madd-y Halfbright did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
I sure hope Dear Leader Kim doesn't take her and McCain hostage.