Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colo. Democrats Eye Second Senate Seat
Associated Press ^ | March 6th. 2005 | STEVEN K. PAULSON

Posted on 03/06/2005 2:11:38 PM PST by GOPXtreme20

Colo. Democrats Eye Second Senate Seat

U.S. National - AP

By STEVEN K. PAULSON, Associated Press Writer

DENVER - After bucking a national trend toward the political right in the last election with wins in the state Capitol and the congressional delegation, emboldened Colorado Democrats are seeking to expand on their gains.

Democrats are convinced Republicans have lost their way in Colorado, said Chris Gates, who was state Democratic Party chairman during the November election.

"There is definitely a significant shift going on in Colorado, and I think Colorado is a beachhead for the Democratic Party in the Rocky Mountain West," said Gates.

A spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Washington, Phil Singer, agrees.

"The success we had in Colorado the last cycle offers a roadmap for success in the West," Singer said.

Democrats also see potential for victories in Montana, which elected Brian Schweitzer as the first Democratic governor in 20 years, and Utah, where Salt Lake County voters elected a Democratic mayor. Arizona and New Mexico have Democratic governors.

On Thursday, Colorado Rep. Mark Udall, a member of a Western political dynasty, announced he would forego a widely expected gubernatorial bid in favor of a 2008 campaign to oust Republican Sen. Wayne Allard.

If Udall wins, he would give Democrats control of both of the state's Senate seats for the first time since 1974.

Allard has refused to say whether he will keep his promise to step down after two terms. If Allard does not run, Republicans may try to persuade Gov. Bill Owens to enter the race after he leaves office in 2006 because of term limits.

In the November election, Democrats picked up the Senate seat vacated by Republican Ben Nighthorse Campbell. Democratic Attorney General Ken Salazar defeated beer magnate Pete Coors to win the seat, and Democrats also captured control of the state Legislature and wrested a congressional seat from the GOP.

Udall's chief of staff, Alan Salazar, who is not related to Ken Salazar, said the November election showed Colorado voters are willing to split the ticket and support candidates instead of parties.

"It's not a red state or a blue state, but a purple state," Salazar said.

Pollster Floyd Ciruli said Colorado has gradually shifted from a staunchly conservative state focused on anti-tax initiatives and conservative values to a more middle-of-the-road stance.

Ciruli said Democrats benefited from unusual circumstances last year that resulted in a huge turnout because of widespread interest in the presidential race, while Republicans focused on re-electing President Bush and defeating a constitutional amendment that would have divided up the state's electoral votes.

"Clearly the Republicans were distracted. The Democrats should not depend on that happening again," Ciruli said.

Colorado Democrats are not entirely unified — because of his support of Ken Salazar, Gates is now out of a job. On Saturday, Gates narrowly lost the party's chairmanship to Pat Waak, a party activist upset because Gates supported Salazar over a more liberal candidate, educator Mike Miles, in the primary. Gates is challenging his loss.

Colorado College political science professor Bob Loevy said he wasn't surprised by Gates' ouster because the state party structure makes it easier for more liberal Democrats to seize control.

Brian Nick, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, maintains that Democrats are now vulnerable because of Salazar's direction in the Senate.

"He jumped head first into the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. It's the Democrats who are misreading Colorado. The president carried Colorado," Nick said.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 2008; allard; coors; electionussenate; salazar; udall; westernvote

1 posted on 03/06/2005 2:11:39 PM PST by GOPXtreme20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

Emboldened by the behavior of Ward Churchill, no doubt.


2 posted on 03/06/2005 2:18:23 PM PST by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

We definitely must be ready for such a possibility. Colorado on election day was almost a disaster; hopefully it won't be so in 2006.


3 posted on 03/06/2005 2:18:50 PM PST by srm913
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srm913

Amen. Colorado Republicans have gotten a bit lazy, IMHO, including myself. I've taken the usual anti-tax, conservative stance for granted. The dems snuck up on us.


4 posted on 03/06/2005 2:20:55 PM PST by kemathen7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

2008? Getting a little ahead of ourselves, aren't we?


5 posted on 03/06/2005 2:23:06 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20
....and I think Colorado is a beachhead for the

OK, I'll admit it, I can't put Colorado and beachhead in the same sentence.

Maybe "Colorado has turned into a raging rapids of Demo enthusiasm

But not a "Beachhead"

6 posted on 03/06/2005 2:36:39 PM PST by ThreePuttinDude (= Dems talk about the mess..,,, We fix the mess...=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!

Please, Colorado, make Salazar and his ilk the last and loneliest Democrats in the West. Please. America's future may depend on keeping the West conservative, solidifying the base in the South, and changing the hearts of the good people in the midwest, who KNOW the Democrats aren't good for the Constitution but are in a habit of voting for their good ol' boy liberal buddies.

Our goal must be to limit the sphere of influence for liberals to the extreme left coast and extreme northeast. Once that is established, inroads can be made into these strongholds of socialism.

7 posted on 03/06/2005 3:20:31 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Colorado has actually become a lot more Republican in the last 15 years because of all the Californian Republican tax refugees have gone there. Not only did Bush improve dramatically in Colo. this time, but the GOP got more votes for the legislature than did the dems.

The problem was that they had a new campaign finance regime that allowed a small number of extremely rich fatcats to target a handful of marginal House and Senate seats. Again, they actually received fewer votes for the legislature in 2004 than the GOP.

The House seat and Senate seat, meanwhile, were great Dem victories, but based mostly on the candidates in the races. Walcher and Coors were both poor candidates, and the Salazar brothers ran away from John Kerry as much as they possibly could.

In short, I think the obviously pro-Democrat AP author of this piece is delusional.

8 posted on 03/06/2005 3:26:18 PM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

If Allard does not run, Republicans may try to persuade Gov. Bill Owens to enter the race after he leaves office in 2006 because of term limits.



What's Owens ratings among the Colorado voters at this time.... Seems he's taken a few hits lately with his marriage thing, loss of the Water item, Salazar winning the Senate seat and lost of the state house/senate to the Democrats......


9 posted on 03/06/2005 3:26:26 PM PST by deport (You know you are getting older when everything either dries up or leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

Senator Ken Salazar is doing a lot to stop this in its tracks. In many ways he ran as a more conservative senator than some of the northeastern republicans. But now he is aligning himself with the democratic leadership, and I don't imagine Coloradans will like the idea of electing another Senator that goes back on his word within a month of taking office.

Specifically, Salazar has now come out against Judge Myers, a man who last year he endorsed for the position he is now nominated for.

He ran promising a "moderate" course, including supporting Bush's nominees for the bench.

It is a shame, because we need to have "choice" in elections, which we can only have if in the red states democrats can run who can promise and deliver on conservative principles. If the electorate learns that the person doesn't matter, only the party, we will end up with an entire senate full of really crappy yes-men for their parties, and everybody will have to vote party instead of people.

This would not be good for our country.

Charles.


10 posted on 03/06/2005 4:11:16 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Walcher and Coors were both poor candidates, and the Salazar brothers ran away from John Kerry as much as they possibly could.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I remember reading on some liberal websites that Salazar ran strongly on anti-gay feelings and tagged Coors with being a gay rights supporter.

11 posted on 03/06/2005 4:28:00 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

looks likes the dems will win this one


12 posted on 03/06/2005 4:30:16 PM PST by freddiedavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

Since Salazar lied to get some "conservatives" to vote for him in '04, I guess the Dems may be able to find another Latino liar to attempt a re-run of their success. The first thing Salazar did was support Kennedy and Byrd in piling on the President over Social Security and judicial appointments. They may talk like a "conservative Catholic" but they are all socialists under the skin.


13 posted on 03/06/2005 4:34:15 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

 

Colorado has actually become a lot more Republican in the last 15 years because of all the Californian Republican tax refugees have gone there. Not only did Bush improve dramatically in Colo. this time, but the GOP got more votes for the legislature than did the dems.

 

 

 

8 posted on 03/06/2005 4:26:18 PM MST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)

 

 

Not so !

 

Coors and others lost because the Bushies were so

intent on not offending the Illegal alien vote,

that they stripped the State party

leadership for themselves.

 

Colorado became more Republican,

when many of us

Reconstructed Southern Democrats

left the Democrat Party after it

was taken over by the socialists

and we registered as Republicans.

 

I did not change parties; the Democrats left me.

 

 

Pollster Floyd Ciruli said Colorado has gradually shifted from a staunchly conservative state focused on anti-tax initiatives and conservative values to a more middle-of-the-road stance.

 

OBTW

Floyd Ciruli is still and always has been a Democrat.

I used to do shooters with him after the

Democrat State Party Conventions twenty-five years ago. 

 

In His Forever Grip

chuck

 


14 posted on 03/06/2005 5:43:43 PM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Walcher and Coors were both poor candidates, and the Salazar brothers ran away from John Kerry as much as they possibly could.

It was rather amusing during the campaign how Ken Salazar would conveniently be unable to show up for one lame reason or another whenever Kerry blew into town.

15 posted on 03/06/2005 6:47:57 PM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20

Colo. Democrats Eye Second Senate Seat
Big deal. GOPers are "eyeing" a lot more rat held seats. There is a difference though, we will take the seats we are "eyeing".


16 posted on 03/07/2005 8:31:43 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (In dealing with liberals remember When you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPXtreme20
The problems in Colorado, and for that matter, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, and even Utah, are essentially demographic. The rapidly increasing Hispanic population is making its political influence felt. It is no coincidence that the Democrats' candidate for the U.S. Senate seat was Hispanic. The second problem is the Yankee and Californian settlement of these Western states. The native white populations tend to conservatism, especially in Mormon majority Utah. However, many of the people attracted to the Front Range cities in Colorado, Phoenix, Tucson, Albuquerque, Santa Fe, and Salt Lake City are East Coast or West Coast natives who were in the first wave, old hippies, then followed by high tech people and yuppies attracted to the outdoor lifestyle of the Rocky Mountain states. Santa Fe has, next to San Francisco, the largest number of same sex households in the country. Sedona, Arizona, a resort town, is a center of New Age mysticism.

Maybe it's time for young conservative Midwesterners and Southerners to consider the old adage "Go west, young man" and offset the deteriorating demographics in the Rocky Mountain states.

17 posted on 03/07/2005 8:47:27 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson