Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.N.: Satellite shows Iraq stripped sites
AP ^ | 3/4/05 | EDITH M. LEDERER

Posted on 03/04/2005 7:45:15 PM PST by TexKat

UNITED NATIONS - Satellite imagery has revealed that approximately 90 sites in Iraq subject to U.N. inspection and monitoring have been stripped of equipment or razed, the chief U.N. weapons inspector said in a report Friday.

Demetrius Perricos said experts from the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission, which he leads, also noted repairs and new construction at 10 sites.

The commission, known as UNMOVIC, previously reported the looting and razing of sites that contained equipment and materials that were subject to inspection because of their potential for use in chemical or biological weapons or the long-range missiles to deliver them. Friday's report to the U.N. Security Council was the first to provide information on the extent of the disappearance and destruction.

While the U.S.-led military is in Iraq and the chief U.S. arms hunter Charles Duelfer found no evidence of weapons programs, the insecurity in the country - and the disappearance of equipment and the reappearance of some pieces in scrapyards in Jordan and the Netherlands - has raised concerns.

U.N. inspectors checked 411 sites in the months before they left Iraq ahead of the U.S.-led war in March 2003. The U.S. government has barred the inspectors from returning, but UNMOVIC experts have acquired and analyzed post-war satellite imagery of 353 sites, "including those considered the most important," the report said.

Experts determined that 70 of the sites sustained bomb damage, the commission said, and about 90 of the 353 sites with sensitive equipment and materials were stripped or razed.

Perricos also referred to Duelfer's Oct. 6 report, which said his Iraq Survey Group found no weapons of mass destruction, discrediting President Bush's stated rationale for invading Iraq.

Duelfer had also expressed concern about biological material that could be used in weapons and was unaccounted for - an issue that Perricos addressed again.

Perricos noted in Friday's report that the Iraqis had handed over 90 unopened vials of biological agents to U.N. weapons inspectors, but declared that 13 vials had been used, some in its biological weapons program.

Both Duelfer and Perricos raised the issue of what happened to residue in the used vials, which can be used to make more biological material. Perricos recommended addressing the issue by monitoring for "any possible future activity associated with biological weapon agent production or dsignificant related laboratory research work."

UNMOVIC's quarterly report, which will be discussed by the council on Tuesday, was released amid reports that the United States has quietly started low-key talks on ending the commission's work. Regardless of what happens to UNMOVIC, however, it is highly likely that the Security Council will insist that Iraq remain under some form of weapons monitoring.

American officials had said repeatedly that the United States would not formally discuss UNMOVIC's future until Duelfer finished his work.

Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Yuri Fedotov, a member of UNMOVIC's board of commissioners, has said Duelfer's report and the recent Iraqi elections are indications that it is time for the Security Council to discuss the future of U.N. inspections. Friday's report also noted that the commissioners recognized that UNMOVIC's mandate was an issue for the Security Council.

UNMOVIC is the outgrowth of a U.N. inspections process created after the 1991 Gulf War in which invading Iraqi forces were ousted from Kuwait. Its staff are considered the only weapons experts specifically trained in biological weapons and missile disarmament.

Separately, the report noted that the United Nations asked commission experts to create a set of enhanced images so that the Indian Ocean areas affected by the Dec. 26 tsunami could be mapped and analyzed.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; satellite; unmovic; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2005 7:45:16 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Ping.


2 posted on 03/04/2005 7:46:28 PM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Ping


3 posted on 03/04/2005 7:53:12 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
The question is when where they strip prior to th war during the war or after the war?

That is the question?

4 posted on 03/04/2005 7:55:52 PM PST by dts32041 (When did the Democratic party stop being the political arm of the KKK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
"Iraq Survey Group"

This appears to be a misnomer. I have a sort of vested interest in subsurface investigation and cannot tell from their report or from publicly available information that this outfit did any real surveys. Of course, with anything that is buried, even with the best instrumentation, it is almost an axiom that you can't find it if you don't know where it is.
5 posted on 03/04/2005 8:00:32 PM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

So if there are questions about the sites while under U.S. occupation, it's newsworthy. When there were questions about the sites under Saddam, it could be smoothed over by his henchmen.

Got it.


6 posted on 03/04/2005 8:01:14 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (Bekaa to the future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
So if there are questions about the sites while under U.S. occupation, it's newsworthy. When there were questions about the sites under Saddam, it could be smoothed over by his henchmen.

I would say that about covers it.

7 posted on 03/04/2005 8:05:51 PM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Will this shut up the "Bush lied" crowd?

(Major find. Thanks for the ping.)

8 posted on 03/04/2005 9:07:50 PM PST by My2Cents (America is divided along issues of morality, between the haves and the have-nots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peach

It's taken the UN almost TWO YEARS to make this announcement? Can anyone spell "c-o-v-e-r-u-p"? What this story tells me is that there's a heck of a lot more information out there about Saddam's WMD program than we've been told, by the UN, and by our own intelligence agencies. Come on, folks...Let's hear the entire story!


9 posted on 03/04/2005 9:12:56 PM PST by My2Cents (America is divided along issues of morality, between the haves and the have-nots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

BTTT


10 posted on 03/04/2005 9:14:42 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
the chief U.N. weapons inspector said in a report Friday.

Ya think!

It's been a long time since you dummies had the balls to even visit Iraq.

I would assume that many of your sites have been converted, razed, or are awaiting demo.

Why don't ya come see?

11 posted on 03/04/2005 9:16:21 PM PST by Cold Heat (FR is still a good place to get the news and slap around an idiot from time to time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat; My2Cents
"Security Council will insist that Iraq remain under some form of weapons monitoring. "

Is this true? Would the US be an advocate of this? The US led coalition is destroying munitions at dizzying speed. Why would we (and Iraq) want the UN sniffing around?

12 posted on 03/04/2005 9:20:57 PM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Bump for morning coffee.


13 posted on 03/04/2005 9:22:11 PM PST by yooling (Screw diversity! Celebrate excellence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
BTTT

Wow. Imagine that. WMD sites in Iraq. Hua? I thought there were none and Iraq had no WMD's??? </Sarcasm>

UN - Which is it? Did they or did they not? Looks like they did.
Liberals - Take that and eat it raw.
14 posted on 03/04/2005 9:24:31 PM PST by Danae (Supporting PETA - People for Eating Tasty Animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

I thought there was no such equipment there in the first place? How could it then be looted?


15 posted on 03/04/2005 9:31:51 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

Suggest checking:
www.washingtontimes.com
Russia tied to Iraq's missing arms
By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published October 28, 2004

http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20041028-122637-6257r


16 posted on 03/04/2005 9:44:24 PM PST by dgallo51 (DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Re: The US talks and SC voting

"The chief UN weapons inspector, Demetrius Perricos, who is the commission's executive chairman, confirmed that the Americans had "started informal consultations" on the commission's future."

"UN diplomats said they did not expect any Security Council action in March or April, but possibly in May."

"The United States wants to get rid of the commission but France wants to keep a roster of chemical, biological and missile inspectors who could be called on in emergencies, the diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity."

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/02/27/news/inspect.html


17 posted on 03/04/2005 9:48:40 PM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Hmmmm!

Wonder how they are going to spin this?

Well there is this:

Perricos also referred to Duelfer's Oct. 6 report, which said his Iraq Survey Group found no weapons of mass destruction,discrediting President Bush's stated rationale for invading Iraq.

Now if the sites were stripped , looted and razed , after the UN inspectors left and before we got there, no wonder we didn't find anything,....so just maybe president Bush was NOT discredited.....besides we invaded for more reasons than what the leftists WANT EVERONE to believe.....

18 posted on 03/04/2005 9:48:51 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Decipher this one....


19 posted on 03/04/2005 9:56:48 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
One thing I found curious is the mention of construction at the sites. One charge of Saddam's continued WMD programs was based on new wings added to the WMD facilities that the UN was refused to enter. This was back before the 2003 invasion. There was reference (from IAEA) to the unknown contractor to that construction. It I believe was kept "in the dark" and most likely French or Russian.

FYI, UNMOVIC has concern that small factories in Iraq may have capability to produce WMD. They empathetically state it won't "of military concern" but may be usefull to non-state actors. Well duh, that may be a problem. It's in their recently posted quarterly report.

Satellite photos of Iraq show unexplained construction - 2002

20 posted on 03/04/2005 10:04:53 PM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson