Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Law: Don't Shoot First, Shout (British hunters must give quarry a warning first.)
The Times [UK] ^ | February 5, 2005 | Valerie Elliott

Posted on 03/04/2005 6:51:29 PM PST by quidnunc

Countryfolk must try to scare off their prey before opening fire

Country sportsmen keen on pigeon pie will need to put the cat among them first. Farmers and landowners will also need to hone their windmill gyrations and scarecrow impersonations if they are planning a potshot at crop-eating birds.

The Government has ruled that it is now illegal to shoot a crow, rook or pigeon for the pot without scaring it first. The legislation says shooters must attempt to frighten off the birds before pulling the trigger.

Only when the birds fail to respond can he or she shoot it for dinner. The same rule applies to farmers who have shooting days blasting woodpigeons and rooks to protect their crops or gamebirds.

At this time of the year thousands of people pull on their camouflages for a day’s rough shooting. They are now acting unlawfully. They too must first engage in frightening techniques to disperse the birds. Only if their antics are ignored can they shoot legally. Failure to comply can result in a fine of up to £5,000 or a maximum six months in prison.

The new rules emerged this week when new “general licences” were issued covering the killing of pest species, which also include magpies, jays, collared doves, Canada geese, and greater and lesser black-backed gulls.

However, without warning, a new rule was added that states: “This licence can only be relied upon in circumstances where the authorised person can demonstrate that appropriate non-lethal methods of control such as scaring are either ineffective or impracticable.”

The “licence” referred to means a general permission for everyone; it is not a piece of paper, it is simply a law. Firearms licences must still be applied for in the usual way.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: animalwhackos; bang; banglist; clueless; cluelessstate; govwatch; hunting; pinglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: 1FASTGLOCK45

That's what I thought too.


21 posted on 03/04/2005 7:15:10 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

This is from The Onion, right? Scrappleface? BSNN?


22 posted on 03/04/2005 7:16:05 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The best way to try and scare them is to yell.....PULL.....followed by a quick shot.


23 posted on 03/04/2005 7:16:23 PM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I never realized that so many Monte Python skits were based on reality.


24 posted on 03/04/2005 7:16:28 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Has spongiform encephalopy really been controlled in England? Are we sure there isn't a subtle brain wasting disease running rampant there?


25 posted on 03/04/2005 7:16:33 PM PST by Axenolith (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; quidnunc

I suspect Rove is behind this. Rove or maybe Rover, the PETA lobbyist....


26 posted on 03/04/2005 7:19:43 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
Axenolith wrote: Has spongiform encephalopy really been controlled in England? Are we sure there isn't a subtle brain wasting disease running rampant there?

Nah, it's no-holds-barred class warfare.

The city proles are bent on making life unpleasant for the country toffs .

27 posted on 03/04/2005 7:20:29 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kaboom

bloody skeet !!


28 posted on 03/04/2005 7:20:41 PM PST by kingattax ( "Evil triumphs when good men do nothing." -Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

It's obviously not particularly subtle.


29 posted on 03/04/2005 7:20:49 PM PST by muawiyah ( (no /sarcasm tag this time))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
WTF?

That is one law I would flat out ignore.

30 posted on 03/04/2005 7:21:34 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("There out ta get me! They won't catch me! I'm #@^#@# innocent! They won't break me" - Guns N Roses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

LOL! "Hellooooo, there, Mr. Fox, old chap, I'm going to fire at you now!"


31 posted on 03/04/2005 7:22:14 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
They too must first engage in frightening techniques to disperse the birds.

What, precisely, constitutes "frightening techniques"? I'd say having a shotgun discharged at me would be rather frightening ...

32 posted on 03/04/2005 7:33:06 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

No self-respecting hunter shoots a sitting bird anyway.

Crows and such don't count.


33 posted on 03/04/2005 7:42:04 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Well this is a stupid law. How they going to shoot anything when they aren't even allowed to have a gun over there? >sarcasm off


34 posted on 03/04/2005 7:57:03 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

I believe that the government must provide all poentially targeted birds with sufficient hours of classroom training to enable them to distinguish between a harmful shout that would cause them to fly and be shot and a harmless sound such as a sneeze.


35 posted on 03/04/2005 8:12:08 PM PST by Tacis ("John ("What SF-180?") Kerry - Still Shilling For Those Who Would Harm America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

Scary that we see it being a possibility. Guess we'll wait and see.


36 posted on 03/04/2005 8:24:30 PM PST by 1FASTGLOCK45 (Banning, A fate worse than death !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
wouldnt you love to see a 'Monty Python' skit on this ?

You mean this wasn't??

37 posted on 03/04/2005 8:28:09 PM PST by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
So now the hunted animal has to die in fear!

And when it's so much more merciful to ***BANG!!*** drop him, never suspecting.

38 posted on 03/04/2005 8:32:31 PM PST by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

I hope someone is able to dump this little turd of liberalism right slap in the middle of the 'GUNGEON"
I keep trying, but the "REDNECK ALERT" catches Me every time.
If this is not evidence of mad cow disease, I sure don't have another clue!
Next, they will need to shout out before they wipe their hiney, to give the bacteria a fighting chance, Ohmygoodness, where are My happy pills? The damned muslims seem to be correct, about some people. I am now speechless, lest I get blacklisted, this post was self censored, try to imagine what I really wanted to say!


39 posted on 03/04/2005 8:34:05 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
The Ministry of Silly Hunting.

The United States and Mexico have a joint migratory bird treaty that requires our states to set a closed season on crows. Apparently this is because there are some species of crows in Mexico that are considered threatened. However, the state laws generally provide that crows may be shot out of "season" if they are seen to be depredating, or about to depredate, farm crops, fruit or nut trees, etc.

Personally, I have never seen a crow that was not depredating, about to depredate, or thinking about depredating something.

40 posted on 03/04/2005 8:36:18 PM PST by 19th LA Inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson