Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Why are these protectionists so bad at math? These aren't my numbers, and I'm surprised they were so small, but 7.5% is 7.5%.

Next year it will be higher, maybe 9%. Still a long way from most (50.1%) or all (100%), but that's just my Catholic school math talking.

I keep forgetting how publik skool math works. LOL!

65 posted on 03/04/2005 1:28:49 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot

It's all about the sacred cows, I like to challenge them to compare WalMart's stock to their competitors, Wally and Target and KMart have like 90% brand consistency so those offensive Chinese goods you find in one will probably be in the others (and in Penneys and Robinsons May and other stores that compete in those product areas). But they just don't dig on that. Never challenge a sacred cow.


68 posted on 03/04/2005 1:32:09 PM PST by discostu (quis custodiet ipsos custodes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Why are these protectionists so bad at math?

$600,000,000,000.00 trade deficit in 2004. Now you do the math. And I am very very good at math, and the first thing one does then working with numbers is get the right numbers. Your are bogus numbers as has been pointed out to you by numberious posters. It is so 2cd grade to use bogus numbers.

69 posted on 03/04/2005 1:33:11 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson