Skip to comments.
Surprise discovery of highly developed structure in the young universe
Eurekalert ^
| 03/02/05
| R. West
Posted on 03/04/2005 7:30:56 AM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Is this sort of related to Mandlebrot sets?
2
posted on
03/04/2005 7:32:22 AM PST
by
Borges
To: Elsie; LiteKeeper; AndrewC; Havoc; bondserv; Right in Wisconsin; ohioWfan; Alamo-Girl; ...
3
posted on
03/04/2005 7:32:43 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Interesting! I will bookmark.
4
posted on
03/04/2005 7:32:45 AM PST
by
cvq3842
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
... twenty creationists show up to tell us it's all a figment of our imagination in 3, 2, 1...
5
posted on
03/04/2005 7:35:53 AM PST
by
ericthecurdog
(NOBODY puts BABY in the corner!!)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
"We seem to have underestimated how quickly the early Universe matured into its present-day state," adds Piero Rosati of ESO, another member of the team. "The Universe did grow up fast!" Either that, or some of your core premises could be wrong.
6
posted on
03/04/2005 7:42:33 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Drooling moron since 1998...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I've been looking for a place to send liberals.
7
posted on
03/04/2005 7:42:58 AM PST
by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: ericthecurdog
why? I do not see how the two conflict with each other...
8
posted on
03/04/2005 7:43:21 AM PST
by
mike182d
("Let fly the white flag of war." - Zapp Brannigan)
To: ericthecurdog
The discovery of such a complex and mature structure so early in the history of the Universe is highly surprising. Indeed, until recently it would even have been deemed impossible. You think this discovery is threatening to Creationists? Seems to me it fits in well with Intelligent Design.
9
posted on
03/04/2005 7:44:04 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: ericthecurdog
Not all creationists are literalists, you know. Many - if not most - interpret six days to be six phases of creation. Few assume that one day for us is one day for God.
10
posted on
03/04/2005 7:45:00 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Not available in stores - for a limited time only)
To: ericthecurdog
>... twenty creationists show up to tell us it's all a figment of our imagination in 3, 2, 1...
I found a dimpled spider, fat and white,
On a white heal-all, holding up a moth
Like a white piece of rigid satin cloth--
Assorted characters of death and blight
Mixed ready to begin the morning right,
Like the ingredients of a witches' broth--
A snow-drop spider, a flower like a froth,
And dead wings carried like a paper kite.
What had that flower to do with being white,
The wayside blue and innocent heal-all?
What brought the kindred spider to that height,
Then steered the white moth thither in the night?
What but design of darkness to appall?--
If design govern in a thing so small.
Design, Robert Frost
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I thought this was another Denise Richards thread.
To: mike182d
Neither do I my friend, neither do I.
13
posted on
03/04/2005 7:47:49 AM PST
by
ericthecurdog
(NOBODY puts BABY in the corner!!)
To: ClearCase_guy
Intelligent design, yes. A fundamentalist view of creation? Probably not.
14
posted on
03/04/2005 7:48:36 AM PST
by
ericthecurdog
(NOBODY puts BABY in the corner!!)
To: ericthecurdog
intelligent design indications yet again.
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: battlecry
I thought this was another Denise Richards thread. There's a heavenly body for you.
What did one astrophysicist say to another astrophysicist on spotting a heavenly body?
Hubble, Hubble!
17
posted on
03/04/2005 7:52:41 AM PST
by
vollmond
(Head back to base for debriefing and cocktails.)
To: vollmond
"What did one astrophysicist say to another astrophysicist on spotting a heavenly body?
Hubble, Hubble!"
You should be struck.
::groan::
18
posted on
03/04/2005 7:58:37 AM PST
by
MacDorcha
(When I say "democratic" I don't mean "Athenian Mob Rule")
To: ClearCase_guy
You think this discovery is threatening to Creationists? Seems to me it fits in well with Intelligent Design.Me too. It seems more threatening to scientists who deny Intelligent Design. Why is it that they are always discovering new things that contradict what they were always so sure about just a few years earlier?
19
posted on
03/04/2005 8:03:36 AM PST
by
murphE
(Each of the SSPX priests seems like a single facet on the gem that is the alter Christus. -Gerard. P)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson