To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Is this sort of related to Mandlebrot sets?
2 posted on
03/04/2005 7:32:22 AM PST by
Borges
To: Elsie; LiteKeeper; AndrewC; Havoc; bondserv; Right in Wisconsin; ohioWfan; Alamo-Girl; ...
3 posted on
03/04/2005 7:32:43 AM PST by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Interesting! I will bookmark.
4 posted on
03/04/2005 7:32:45 AM PST by
cvq3842
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
... twenty creationists show up to tell us it's all a figment of our imagination in 3, 2, 1...
5 posted on
03/04/2005 7:35:53 AM PST by
ericthecurdog
(NOBODY puts BABY in the corner!!)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
"We seem to have underestimated how quickly the early Universe matured into its present-day state," adds Piero Rosati of ESO, another member of the team. "The Universe did grow up fast!" Either that, or some of your core premises could be wrong.
6 posted on
03/04/2005 7:42:33 AM PST by
dirtboy
(Drooling moron since 1998...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I've been looking for a place to send liberals.
7 posted on
03/04/2005 7:42:58 AM PST by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I thought this was another Denise Richards thread.
To: Gorzaloon
23 posted on
03/04/2005 8:38:59 AM PST by
Beaker
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Translation: "We don't have a clue. We're making it up as we go along."
26 posted on
03/04/2005 8:46:27 AM PST by
almcbean
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Maybe the Universe has always existed and just undergoes periodic reorganizations to appease stockholders and hide book keeping irregularities?
28 posted on
03/04/2005 8:46:35 AM PST by
Duke Nukum
(King had to write, to sing the song of Gan. And I had to read. How else could Roland find the Tower?)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
From the article:
"We seem to have underestimated how quickly the early Universe matured into its present-day state," adds Piero Rosati of ESO, another member of the team. "The Universe did grow up fast!"A perfect example of paradigm prejudice at work. Note how the direct observation is interpreted in light of the paradigm . The observation is: Wow, we underestimated how quickly the universe matured. It is not: Wow, we underestimated the age of the universe.
31 posted on
03/04/2005 9:06:20 AM PST by
frgoff
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
"Reddish and elliptical," a perfect description of Michael Moore. Time for another episode of "Pigs in Space."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson