Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Of course, I'm really not surprised at this one. And of course the MSM hasn't mentioned this one.
1 posted on 03/03/2005 9:11:08 AM PST by FeeinTennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Velveeta; Dolphy; appalachian_dweller; ...

ping


2 posted on 03/03/2005 9:14:17 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
So will Russia move into Lebanon to retrieve them with the fleeing Syrians?
3 posted on 03/03/2005 9:14:29 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
".......in Lebanon's Bekka valley......."

This might indicate a reason for the scumbag, Mafia-esque Syrians hesitating about getting their troops out right away.........Look at all the neat toys that they're going to be leaving behind that are buried in the Bekka.

4 posted on 03/03/2005 9:16:00 AM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

This story has been running since the invasion of Iraq. It almost looks like Russia is being allowed the opportunity to clear the stuff out of Lebanon and Syria.


5 posted on 03/03/2005 9:16:30 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

I'd like to see them try to move them now ...


6 posted on 03/03/2005 9:16:55 AM PST by tarzantheapeman (Give Howard the mike ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

Wonder what Vladimir Putin's comments are ?


7 posted on 03/03/2005 9:17:38 AM PST by peacebaby (Moser, how'd you like the cover of the MA05?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee; Destro; A. Pole; GarySpFc; Lion in Winter
You're about 5 months behind on this, this was mentioned all over the media, this was Kerry's October surprise and was proven to be pure BS. First, it was trumpt out to show that Bush has no control in Iraq and was proven false. The military accounted for the lost munitions since they used them to destroy some 500,000 tons of other munitions.

Second John Shaw has been removed from his position for corruption and there is an FBI investigation on him. He also had ZERO collaberating evidence, except for his opinion. Not much for a foundation, now is it?

8 posted on 03/03/2005 9:18:56 AM PST by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

So is this another "slam dunk"?


9 posted on 03/03/2005 9:19:01 AM PST by Publius Scipio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
Moscow Moved Weapons to Syria and Lebanon According to a former top Bush administration official, Russian special forces teams moved weapons of mass destruction out of Iraq to Syria. "I am absolutely sure that Russian Spetsnatz units moved WMD out of Iraq before the war," stated John Shaw, the former deputy undersecretary for international technology security.

now,......exactly WHERE are those THREE 'Russian-SH' MYSTERY SHIPS that 'got away'?

10 posted on 03/03/2005 9:20:00 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
The Russians were able to move hundreds of tons of chemical, biological and nuclear materials without being discovered by CIA satellites or NSA radio listening post

Who says the CIA and NSA didn't discover the movement. We've heard that the stuff was moved, and that their were photos of the movement, for a good long time.

The difference here is that that the source is not some unnamed official, but rather a named individual within the government. IOW, a verifiable source.

14 posted on 03/03/2005 9:22:12 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

I know we'd all like to believe this, but how reliable is this source?


24 posted on 03/03/2005 9:28:52 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

btt


27 posted on 03/03/2005 9:31:31 AM PST by Ender Wiggin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

Don't worry, the MSM will have a hard time covering up the story when the Chechen's get their hands on a nuke or Chem and detonate it in Red Square killing ten's of thousands.


30 posted on 03/03/2005 9:33:59 AM PST by NEBUCHADNEZZAR1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

gee..shucks..I wonder if the commies are funding the insurgency in iraq now as well...duh!


31 posted on 03/03/2005 9:34:31 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

Why do I get the idea that we are going to be hearing a lot more about those WMD in the near future?


37 posted on 03/03/2005 9:41:22 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
regardless if it's true or not. Since when are chemical agents considered a WMD? We haven't figured out what the definition of a WMD is for this week yet. Chemical weapons doesn't cut it any more. If/When we find Iraqi nukes the MSM will change the definition of WMD to the Laser guns the aliens used in Independence Day.
49 posted on 03/03/2005 9:52:32 AM PST by tfecw (Vote Democrat, It's easier then working)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

I have asked in this forum and have searched on the internet for an answer to this question, If Iraq did not have CBW at the time of the war what happened to them? Does anyone have an answer.
A summary of this issue is provided by:
http://www.iraqwatch.org/bulletins/vol2iss6nov03.htm
Volume 2, Issue 6
November-December 2003

Iraqi Weapons: Five Unanswered Questions

By Shabnam Faruki

"Despite the fact that no cache of mass destruction weapons has been found in Iraq, a number of crucial questions about Iraq's past weapon efforts - raised by nearly a decade of U.N. inspections - remain unanswered. ....

The existence of these unresolved issues cannot be taken lightly. ...... Below is a list of the top five concerns:


1. VX

The inspectors never could figure out what happened to 3.9 tonnes of VX, the deadliest kind of nerve gas. Iraq admitted producing VX in 1988 and 1990, but furnished no convincing evidence that it was destroyed in 1991, as Iraq claimed. This failure was not cured by an Iraqi report handed to inspectors in March 2003, which attempted to account for up to 63 percent of the missing VX.

2. Anthrax

The inspectors concluded that Iraq may not have destroyed about 10,000 liters of the biological agent anthrax, which if properly stored, could still be viable. Iraq admitted producing 8,425 liters of anthrax, but claimed it had disposed of all the agent in 1991, and provided inspectors with a series of technical reports aimed at substantiating the claim. However, the reports failed to prove exactly how much anthrax was disposed of.

3. Other Germ Warfare Agents

Iraq did not explain what happened to thousands of liters of other biological agent that it admitted producing, including more than 340 liters of clostridium perfringens - though inspectors concluded that Iraq had enough growth medium to have made "much larger quantities." This agent would still be viable today if properly stored. The inspectors were also unable to account for some 19,000 liters of botulinum toxin and at least 2,200 liters of aflatoxin. Neither of these agents would be viable today, but accounting for them is necessary to determine the total amount of germ agent and the individual amounts of each agent that Iraq produced.

4. Chemical and Biological Munitions

Iraq consumed 6,526 fewer chemical-filled aerial bombs - containing some 1,000 tons of agent (mostly mustard gas, but also sarin and tabun) - during the Iran-Iraq war than it claimed, according to the "Air Force document" handed over by Iraq in December 2002. Moreover, inspectors could not account for 550 mustard-filled artillery shells that Iraq claimed to have lost. The inspectors determined that Iraqi mustard gas was still of a very high quality. Also unaccounted for are 29 germ-filled bombs, some possibly containing anthrax."End quote


57 posted on 03/03/2005 9:59:12 AM PST by Razorism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

Pootie Poo! How could you!?


62 posted on 03/03/2005 10:03:14 AM PST by Drawsing (Congress doesn't need to see the light...they just need to feel the heat..Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
Read More Than 150 News Reports About Iraq's WMDs, Syria Has Them and Saddam's Links to Al Qaeda:

Click Here

69 posted on 03/03/2005 10:30:49 AM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

They are the world's worst proliferators. Naturally, they have great expertise in shell games, smuggling and other forms of obfuscation.


71 posted on 03/03/2005 10:31:43 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson